Cymadusa sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:855E59CC-181D-41AB-8DCE-9E3805791623 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8006879 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A97687CE-3249-BA49-B3B2-FB0EFAADA950 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cymadusa sp. |
status |
|
( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 )
Cymadusa sardenta View in CoL — Sivaprakasam, 1970: 153, fig. 13.
Not Cymadusa sardenta Oliveira, 1953: 365 View in CoL , pls 256–26
Cymadusa filosa View in CoL — Rabindranath, 1972: 173, figs. 8–9.
not Cymadusa filosa Savigny, 1816: 51 View in CoL , 109, p. IV, figs 1a, b, e, i, o, u.
Rabindranath (1972) recorded C. filosa Savigny (1816) View in CoL from the Gulf of Mannar, India, but later, Peart (2004) synonymized his material with C. setosa ( Haswell, 1879) View in CoL . The illustrations and description given by Rabindranath (1972) exhibit several differences with C. setosa Haswell. In View in CoL Rabindrantath’s material the accessory flagellum of antenna 1 is 3-articulate, not 2-articulate as in C. setosa Haswell View in CoL ; in the male gnathopod 1, the propodus approaches subrectangular with a substraight posterior margin and with a palm that is clearly delimited from the posterior margin, whereas in C. setosa Haswell View in CoL , the propodus is subovoid and the palm and posterior margin are continuous and convex; in the male gnathopod 2 the proximal process on the palm is small rounded knob, but in C. setosa Haswell View in CoL it is a broad flat-topped shelf. These differences along with the much longer and denser setae on the antennae and gnathopods in Rabindrantath’s material, when compared with C. setosa Haswell View in CoL , indicate the distinctness of the Indian material. We consider that the material described under the name Cymadusa sardenta (Oliveira) View in CoL by Sivaprakasam (1970) is conspecific with the taxon attributed to Cymadusa filosa View in CoL by Rabindranath (1972).
The material described by Rabindranath (1972) does not appear to have been deposited in a museum. Rabindranath (1972) states that types are deposited in the Indian Museum, Kolkata, but since he did not consider this material to be a new species, the specimens did not constitute type material. Dr Santanu Mitra has searched for the material in crustacean section of the Zoological Survey of India (formerly Indian Museum), Kolkata but did not find the material of Rabindranath (1972). Dr Biju Kumar, professor at Kerala University has reported that the marine biology laboratory at Kerala University has been closed for decades, so any material deposited there has been lost. For this reason, we consider the material to be lost and we are therefore unable to recognize it with a formal name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Senticaudata |
InfraOrder |
Corophiida |
ParvOrder |
Corophiidira |
SuperFamily |
Corophioidae |
Family |
|
Genus |
Cymadusa sp.
Thacker, Dimple, Myers, Alan & Trivedi, Jigneshkumar 2023 |
Cymadusa filosa
Rabindranath, P. 1972: 173 |
Cymadusa sardenta
Sivaprakasam, T. E. 1970: 153 |
Cymadusa sardenta
Oliveira, L. P. H. 1953: 365 |
Cymadusa filosa
Savigny, J. C. 1816: 51 |