Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull, 1792
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12650024 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AEA241-FFA3-FFCA-FF7A-C2DDC8EEF262 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull, 1792 |
status |
|
Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull, 1792 View in CoL
=alauda (Fabricius 1792)
References: Fleischer 1829, Seidlitz 1872 –1875 ( C. pleurostigma and C. assimilis View in CoL ), 1887–1891 ( C. pleurostigma and C. assimilis View in CoL ), Rathlef 1905 ( C. pleurostigma and C. assimilis View in CoL ), Lindberg 1932, Ozols 1963, Varzinska, Milenders 1981, Telnov et al. 1997 ( C. pleurostigma and C. assimilis View in CoL ), Telnov 2004 ( C. pleurostigma and C. assimilis View in CoL ).
Examined material: 2 specimens: Daugavpils d.: Ilgas, Silene NPT, 18 June 1995 (1, leg. A. Barśevskis); Daugavpils d.: Ilgas, Silene NPT, 26 June 1997 (1, leg. A. Barśevskis) .
Host plants: Berteroa, Brassica, Bunias , Cakile, Capsella, Erysimum, Myagrum, Rorippa, Raphanus, Sinapis, Sisymbrium, Thlaspi (Cruciferae) .
Phenology: VII–VIII.
General distribution: Europe, Turkey, N Africa ( Algeria, Morocco), W and C Siberia, Central Asia ( Iran, Kazakhstan) [CEM]. Has been introduced to N America.
Note: Data about occurrence of this species is scarce.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull, 1792
ne, LÓga Anna Leita, Aksjuta, KristÓna & Balalaikins, Maksims 2022 |
C. assimilis
Paykull 1792 |
C. assimilis
Paykull 1792 |
C. assimilis
Paykull 1792 |
C. assimilis
Paykull 1792 |
C. assimilis
Paykull 1792 |