Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani Erünal-Erentöz, 1958
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2021v43a24 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D36D1E14-73BE-4176-8024-F3673A65B8C1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5768077 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B58177-FFA3-6C7E-FCB3-4275A6A7F937 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani Erünal-Erentöz, 1958 |
status |
|
Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani Erünal-Erentöz, 1958
( Figs 19 View FIG , 20 View FIG ; Table 9)
Conus (Dentroconus) gulemani Erünal-Erentöz, 1958: 113 , pl. 18, figs 5-6.
Conus bitorosus – Caze et al. 2011a: 172, fig. 2L.
TYPE MATERIAL. — One syntype: MNHN.FA26722 ; three or four syntypes, MTA, Ankara. TYPE LOCALITY. — Zengen Köy S , Dereboğazi (Karaman Basin, Turkey). According to Landau et al. (2013) the localities of the Karaman Basin are Serravallian in age. STRATIGRAPHIC RANGE. — Serravallian (Karaman Basin, Turkey ( Landau et al. 2013) and Tortonian of Greece (Messara and Ierapetra Basins, Crete). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Greece. Psalidha: two specimens AMPG(IV) 2663 , 2665 ; Tefeli: six specimens from AMPG(IV) 2676-2681 . Filippi: nine specimen AMPG(IV) 2664 , 2668-2675 ; Crete: two specimens ( MNHN.F. A72640 View Materials and MNHN.F. A72641 View Materials ). All of them display colour patterns under UV light .
SHELL DESCRIPTION
Small-to-medium-sized shells.Spire whorls weakly convex, with strongly coeloconoid outline on early whorls, that decreases on later whorls. Spire height low to moderate. Spire low ( Fig. 20D View FIG ) to moderately high ( Fig. 20E View FIG ). Suture impressed. Subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Maximum diameter below rounded shoulder. Last spire whorl slightly inflated, convex not straight. Aperture curved, widening towards fasciole. Canal moderately wide, fasciole twisted, inflated.
DESCRIPTION OF COLOUR PATTERN
The colour pattern consists of one layer of a series of closely related, spiral rows of dashes ( Fig. 20B View FIG ), disrupted randomly by non-fluorescent dots or small dashes. The non-fluorescent dots are slightly wider than the fluorescent spiral rows. Sometimes the dots are axially aligned, creating a synchronous, vertical disruption of the spiral rows. The dots on the spiral rows are not constant in numbers or distances and can be multiple or few. This results in a variety of colour patterns, with shells having mostly spiral rows of elongated dashes with very few interruptions ( Fig. 20B View FIG ), to patterns with multiple disruptions, resembling series of short fluorescent dashes ( Fig. 20D View FIG ).
REMARKS
Erünal-Erentöz (1958) described Conus (Dendroconus) gulemani distinguishing it from the rest of her known Conidae by the relative narrower shoulder width, the coeloconoid spire whorls and the colour pattern of spiral dashes. One syntype stored in the MNHN (MNHN.F. A26722 View Materials ; Fig. 19 View FIG ) is very similar in morphology ( Table 9) and colour pattern to the Greek specimens ( Fig. 20 View FIG ). Therefore, we consider them conspecific with Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani .
Caze et al. (2011a) identified a specimen (MNHN.F.A30841) from Makrilia as Conus bitorosus Fontannes, 1880 . Conus bitorosus , however, has a straight conical spire whorl outline (see Fontannes 1880, pl. 8 fig. 12 and Sacco 1893b, pl. 10, fig.19), whereas Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani has clearly a coeloconoid spire outline. As such, we believe that the specimen of Caze et al. (2011a) belongs to Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani .
The colour pattern of this species is similar to species like Conus (Kalloconus) hungaricus Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 and Conus (Kalloconus) tietzei Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 , but both species differ from Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani by their shell morphology ( Fig. 21 View FIG ). Conus (Kalloconus) hungaricus has club shaped shells, wider relative diameter of the last whorl and conical spire whorls. Conus (Kalloconus) tietzei has a more angulated shoulder and straight last whorl, which is slightly more inflated in Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani . “ Dendroconus ” pyruloides var. planacutispira ( Sacco 1893a: pl. 1, fig. 27) is morphologically similar to our material, but it differs in the angle of the last whorl near the fasciole, a feature lacking in Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani . A species with an identical colour pattern, but with shorter spire whorls is Conus (Kalloconus) pseudonivifer Monteiro, Tenorio & Poppe, 2004 ( Monteiro et al. 2004), an extant species from the Cape Verde islands. Because of these similarities, both species seem to be closely related.
SL | MD | AH | HMD | AL | SA | LWA | LW | RD | PMD RSH | SSFD SSFd PV | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Largest specimen | 39.19 mm | 25.8 mm | 33.97 mm | 26.82 mm | 35.08 mm | 123° | 35° | 1.52 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.13 | |||
Mean | 28 mm | 17.9 mm | 25.5 mm | 20.3 mm | 25.7 mm | 129.4° 43° | 1.58 | 0.7 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 2.92 | 9.27 | 0.46 | |
Standard deviation | 5.56 | 4.09 | 5.1 | 4.07 | 5.29 | 11.53 | 4.43 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.11 | 2.95 | 0.14 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Conus (Kalloconus) gulemani Erünal-Erentöz, 1958
Psarras, Christos, Koskeridou, Efterpi & Merle, Didier 2021 |
Conus bitorosus
CAZE B. & MERLE D. & SAINT MARTIN J. - P. & PACAUD J. - M. 2011: 172 |
Conus (Dentroconus) gulemani Erünal-Erentöz, 1958: 113
Erünal-Erentöz 1958: 113 |