Collodes leptocheles Rathbun, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4688.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B775D9AD-027C-443A-AE9E-19A879A30A41 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5934759 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D88A70-FFAB-5716-4085-6F37DD83F81C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Collodes leptocheles Rathbun, 1894 |
status |
|
Collodes leptocheles Rathbun, 1894 View in CoL
( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 )
Collodes leptocheles Rathbun, 1894: 53—1900 View in CoL : 508; 1925: 117, fig. 42, pl. 38, figs. 5–6.— Pequegnat 1970: 181 — Powers 1977: 44 — Abele & Kim 1986: 38 — Boschi 2000: 75 — McLaughlin et al. 2005: 251, 311— Ng et al. 2008: 115 (list)— Felder et al. 2009: 1076 — Santana & Tavares 2017: 1147 (comparative material).
Material examined. 2 females, cl: 42 & 45 mm, cw: 12 & 13 mm ( MOUFPE 19233 View Materials ), R/ V Seaward Johnson, Potiguar Basin, Rio Grande do Norte, Station #MT–52, 04°44’S, 036°25’W, 23 May 2011, otter trawl, 180 m, gravel bottom, temperature 28.8°C, salinity 36.6 GoogleMaps .
Geographic distribution. Western Atlantic: Gulf of Mexico (Florida – type locality – Louisiana and southeast of Caribbean Sea) ( Rathbun 1894; Felder et al. 2009) and Brazil (Rio Grande do Norte) (present study).
Occurring between 91 and 384 m depth ( Rathbun 1894; Pequegnat 1970; Abele & Kim 1986; Felder et al. 2009).
Remarks. Collodes Stimpson, 1860 , is an endemic, amphi-American genus inhabiting shallow waters down to around 700 m. The genus currently comprises of 16 species, five of which are found in Brazilian waters: Collodes armatus Rathbun, 1898 ; C. inermis A. Milne-Edwards, 1878 ; C. rostratus A. Milne-Edwards, 1879 ; C. trispinosus Stimpson, 1871 ; and C. tuerkayi Santana & Tavares, 2017 (see Santana & Tavares 2017).
The present specimens fit well with the original description provided by Rathbun (1894), but presented some variations, highlighted in bold:
Carapace pyriform, longer than wide, dorsal surface densely covered with tubercles ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ); branchial, cardiac, intestinal spines absent ( Fig 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Rostrum short, bifurcated, divided by U-shaped notch into two blunt teeth ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Antenna distinctly exceeding rostral length, third article slightly shorter. Supraorbital spine absent; postorbital tooth broad and long, as long as the eyestalk, directed laterally, tip slightly curved anteriorly ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Antennular fossae elongated, septum long formed by a strong spine, which does not exceed the septum area ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); antenullar flagellum surpassing the rostrum tip, with first and second antennal articles fused to epistome. Epistome slightly wider than long ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); epistomial spine separated by small gap from inter-antennular septum ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ). Mouth subrectangular; pterygostomial spine with few subequal tubercles. Third maxilliped with long exopod, reaching halfway along length of merus, dorsal face with subequals tubercles; ischium longer than wide; merus longer than half of ischium; palp cylindrical, longer than merus, with rows of setae. Hepatic region well marked, convex. Chelipeds subcylindrical in both sexes, slender, fingers as long as palm ( Fig. 4F View FIGURE 4 ); merus, ischium with few tubercles; propodus, carpus, dactylus smooth with long setae. Pereopods 2–5 (ambulatory legs 1–4) slender, slightly granulated, setose; P2, P3 longest when compared with the P4, P5 ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ); merus, carpus, propodus, dactylus covered with small tubercles; dactylus broadly curved ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Pleotelson subtriangular, rounded distally ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ). Pleonal somites 1–4 free, somites 5, 6 and telson fused ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Females present a prominent tubercle in the midline of fifth abdominal somite ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ) and one prominent spine on first ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ).
Collodes leptocheles is closely related to C. robustus Smith, 1883 (distributed from Massachusetts to Florida on the US east coast, the Gulf of Mexico and the southeastern Caribbean Sea), but is distinguished from it by the fifth pleonal somite having a strong spine in males and a prominent tubercle in the midline in females ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ) (versus fifth abdominal somite without spines in males and with small, evenly distributed tubercles in females C. robustus ). Collodes leptocheles was previously known from the Gulf of Mexico ( Felder et al. 2009) and is here recorded for the first time from far further south (about 6,800 km) off the northeastern Brazilian coast (Rio Grande do Norte).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Collodes leptocheles Rathbun, 1894
Alves-Júnior, Flavio De Almeida, Lucatelli, Débora, Santana, William & Souza-Filho, Jesser Fidelis De 2019 |
Collodes leptocheles Rathbun, 1894: 53—1900
Santana, W. & Tavares, M. 2017: 1147 |
Felder, D. L. & Alvarez, F. & Goy, J. W. & Lemaitre, R. 2009: 1076 |
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. J. F. 2008: 115 |
Mclaughlin, P. A. & Camp, D. K. & Angel, M. & Bousfield, E. L. & Brunel, P. & Brusca, R. C. & Cadien, D. & Cohen, A. C. & Conlan, K. & Eldredge, L. G. & Felder, D. L. & Goy, J. W. & Haney, T. A. & Hann, B. & Heard, R. W. & Hendrycks, E. A. & Hobbs III, H. H. & Holsinger, J. & Kensley, B. & Laubitz, D. R. & Lecroy, S. E. & Lemaitre, R. & Maddocks, R. F. & Martin, J. W. & Mikkelsen, P & Nelson, E. & Newman, W. A. & Overstreet, R. M. & Poly, W. J. & Price, W. W. & Reid, J. W. & Robertson, A. & Rogers, D. C. & Ross, A. & Schotte, M. & Schram, F. R. & Shih, C. - T. & Watling, L. & Wilson, G. D. F. & Turgeon, D. D. 2005: 251 |
Boschi, E. E. 2000: 75 |
Abele, L. G. & Kim, W. 1986: 38 |
Powers, L. W. 1977: 44 |
Pequegnat, W. E. 1970: 181 |
Rathbun, M. J. 1894: 508 |