Chimaerocyon shimadai, Fikáček, Martin, Maruyama, Munetoshi, Vondráček, Dominik & Short, Andrew E. Z., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3716.2.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D975C77F-83DB-48C6-A698-84A24665D838 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6149747 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038087C2-8A3A-143E-FF76-F905FC40FC66 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chimaerocyon shimadai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chimaerocyon shimadai View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 , 6–13 View FIGURES 6 – 14 , 15–21 View FIGURES 15 – 22 , 23–26, 28–30 View FIGURES 23 – 30 )
Type material. Holotype: male (KUZC): MALAYSIA: Pahang / Bukit Fraser (1250 m), / 25.IV.2011 / SHIMADA Taku. Paratypes: 2 males, 1 female (KUZC, NMPC): same label data as the holotype.
DNA isolate and sequences of the holotype. The DNA isolate of the holotype is deposited in NMPC. Sequence data were submitted into GenBank under the following accession numbers: cox1 — KF623548 View Materials ; cox2 — KF623549 View Materials ; 18S — KF623550 View Materials ; 28S — KF623551 View Materials .
Description. Body length 2.6–2.9 mm (2.7 mm in holotype), body width 1.9–2.2 mm (2.0 mm in holotype). Body widest at anterior margin of elytra, strongly narrowing posteriad; elytra slightly roof-like in anterior view. Coloration black with widely reddish margins of clypeus, elytra and lateral and sutural margins of elytra; ventral surface and appendages reddish brown. Head with dense punctation consisting of crescent-like to semicircular punctures, without microsculpture on interstices; punctation on pronotum and elytra as dense as that on head, consisting of slightly finer punctures; pronotal punctures transverse, scar-like, elytral punctures dot-like. Eyes divided by 7.5× the width of one eye in dorsal view. Mentum with sparse moderately strong punctation. Elytron with remnants of four or five striae posteromesally situated in deep depression; lateral portion of elytra widely explanate. Mesoventral plate rhomboid, slightly longer than wide, with slightly concave margins. Median portion of metaventrite with fine but dense punctation bearing enlarged setae posteromesally in male, uniformly pubescent in female. Abdominal ventrites with dense and rather coarse setiferous punctation, bearing longer and slightly denser pubescence around apical emargination in both sexes. Abdominal ventrite 5 widely emarginate apically with posterior margin of emargination irregularly convex in male, narrowly and simply emarginate in female. Metatarsus extremely short, with metatarsomere 1 ca. 1.5× as long as tarsomere 2. Male sternite 9 with numerous stout setae apically. Aedeagus 1.3 mm long, phallobase ca. 0.5× as long as paramere, strongly asymmetrical; paramere weakly narrowing from base to apical fourth, membranous, flat and slightly expanded apically, without apical setae.
Diagnosis. Chimaerocyon shimadai sp. nov. may be distinguished from C. sumatranus sp. nov. by the combination of the following characters: (1) the dorsal surface is piceous with widely reddish margins of elytra, pronotum and clypeus ( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) (dorsal surface is uniformly reddish in C. sumatranus , Figs. 4–5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ); (2) elytra highly arched, forming a pointed arch in anterior view ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) (elytra widely rounded in anterior view in C. sumatranus , Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ); (3) the emargination of abdominal ventrite 5 sexually dimorphic in shape, wide and subrectangular in male, narrowly semicircular in female ( Figs. 12–13 View FIGURES 6 – 14 ) (widely bisinuate in female in C. sumatranus ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 6 – 14 ), male is unknown for the latter species); (4) both sexes with longer setae around apical emargination of abdominal ventrite 5 ( Figs. 12–13 View FIGURES 6 – 14 ) (without such setae in C. sumatranus , Fig. 14 View FIGURES 6 – 14 ); (5) mesoventral plate as long as wide or only slightly longer, rhomboid in shape (ca. 1.4× longer than wide, with strongly concave sides in C. sumatranus ). Besides these characters, there are also slight differences in the number of impressed series at the elytral apex (4–5 series in C. shimadai , 5 series in C. sumatranus ; Figs. 26–27 View FIGURES 23 – 30 ) and in the character of the punctation of the mentum ( Figs. 19, 22 View FIGURES 15 – 22 ) and the metaventrite (moderately coarse in C. shimadai , consisting of fine punctures in C. sumatranus ), but it is not clear at present to what extent these characters are intraspecifically variable due to the low number of specimens examined. We expect that both species also differ in the morphology of the aedeagus and the shape of the apical emargination of male abdominal ventrite 5, but this may be only confirmed once the male of C. sumatranus is discovered.
Etymology. The species is dedicated to Mr. Taku Shimada, the collector of the type series.
Biology. The beetles were collected from a brood cell of a nest of Pheidole singaporensis Özdikmen, 2010 (replacement name for Pheidole longipes (Smith, 1857)) . The nest was in a cliff along a forest trail in Bukit Fraser.
The only female available had a single egg ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6 – 14 ) with completely developed chorion in its abdomen, measuring 0.85×0.35 mm and hence occupying a large part of the internal abdominal volume.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Peninsular Malaysia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Sphaeridiinae |
Genus |