Aridelus rutilipoides, Fujie & Maeto, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1092.73299 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85ACA852-BA57-4845-B155-94B08C028559 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A58CF41-B558-41CA-A5E6-DBDF8D66D1F2 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7A58CF41-B558-41CA-A5E6-DBDF8D66D1F2 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Aridelus rutilipoides |
status |
sp. nov. |
Aridelus rutilipoides sp. nov.
Fig. 7A-I View Figure 7
Type material.
Holotype, ♀, "(JAPAN) Nagano Pref., Ueda City, Sugadaira-kougen, Tsukuba Univ., 36-31N/138-20E, about 1300 m alt., 13 IX 2013 (sweeping), Sou Shimizu leg." (OMNH). Paratypes: 1♀, Hokkaidô Pref., Sapporo City, Teine Ward, Mt. Teine, 18.IX.2013, S. Fujie leg. (OMNH); 1♀, Tochigi Pref., Nikkô, 13.X.1986, M. Miyazaki leg. (NARO); 1♀, Nagano Pref., Shimashima-dani, 1300-1600 m alt., 26.VIII.1978, K. Maetô leg. (NARO); 1♀, Tokushima Pref., Ichiu Vil., Mt. Tsurugi, 15.X.1980, Y. Shôno leg. (NARO).
Etymology.
Named after its similarity to A. rutilipes Papp. The Latin suffix - “oides” taken from Greek means similar but not the same.
Description.
Female holotype (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ). Body length 6.5 mm.
Head (Fig. 7B, C, D, E View Figure 7 ). Width of head 2.0 × median length and 1.1 × width of mesonotum. Length of eye 1.2 × length of temple in dorsal view. OOL / OD = 4.1. POL / OD = 1.7. Vertex and temple densely punctate. Occipital carina complete. Frons smooth and shining, with a distinct median carina. Face 1.9 × as wide as high; finely punctate laterally, transversely punctate-rugose medially. Intertentorial distance / tentorio-ocular distance = 1.7. Clypeus finely punctate, slightly concave medially, without apical teeth. Length of malar space 0.60 × eye height. Malar suture indistinct. Antenna filiform with 18 segments; 3rd segment 3.5 × longer than wide and 1.2 × longer than 4th one; penultimate one 1.3 × longer than wide.
Mesosoma (Fig. 7F View Figure 7 ). Mesosoma areolate, 1.3 × as long as high. Scutellum without median smooth area.
Wings (Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ). Fore wing 5.0 mm in length, 1-R1 / length of pterostigma = 1.3, r / 3-SR = 2.4, m-cu distinctly antefurcal. Hind wing with 1r-m / 2-SC+R = 0.8.
Legs (Fig. 7H View Figure 7 ). Hind leg: femur 5.2 × longer than wide, length of femur: tibia: basitarsus = 1: 1.3: 0.6.
Metasoma (Fig. 7I View Figure 7 ). Metasoma smooth and polished. First metasomal tergite 5.9 × longer than its apical width. Hypopygium truncated and excised apically. Ovipositor sheath hardly exserted beyond apex of metasoma.
Colour. Black. Antenna basally, mandible medially, palpi, tegula, legs except for telotarsus, metasoma reddish brown; mandible basally and apically, veins, telotarsus dark brown, antenna gradually darkened towards apex; pterostigma pale in basal quarter. Fore wing hyaline with two fuscous band. Hind wing with a fuscous band in apical third.
Variation in females. Body length 5.8-6.5 mm. Length of eye 1.2-1.4 × length of temple in dorsal view; OOL / OD = 3.5-4.1. POL / OD = 1.5-1.9. Face 1.7-1.9 × as wide as high. Intertentorial distance / tentorio-ocular distance = 1.7-1.9. Length of malar space 0.5-0.6 × eye height. Malar suture indistinct or absent. Third antennal segment 3.5-4.0 × longer than wide and 1.2-1.4 × longer than 4th one; penultimate one 1.2-1.3 × longer than wide. Mesosoma length 1.3-1.4 × height. Fore wing 4.8-5.2 mm in length, 1-R1 / length of pterostigma = 1.2-1.5, r / 3-SR = 2.2-3.6. Hind wing with 1r-m / 2-SC+R = 0.8-1.0. Hind leg: femur 4.6-5.2 × longer than wide, length of femur: tibia: basitarsus = 1: 1.3-1.4: 0.6. First metasomal tergite 5.9-6.3 × longer than its apical width.
Male. Unknown.
Distribution.
Japan ( Hokkaidô; Honshû: Nagano Prefecture; Shikoku: Tokushima Prefecture).
Hosts.
Unknown.
Remarks.
This species closely resembles A. rutilipes Papp (Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ) but differs in having the stouter penultimate antennal segment (in Aridelus rutilipoides , 1.2-1.3 × longer than wide (Fig. 7E View Figure 7 ), in Aridelus rutilipes 1.8 × (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 )), the face finely punctate laterally, transversely punctate-rugose medially (finely punctate in Aridelus rutilipes ), the apical hyaline area of the fore wing not reaching the apico-posterior edge (Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ) (in Aridelus rutilipes , reaching the apico-posterior edge (Fig. 6A View Figure 6 )) and the metasoma reddish brown (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ) (dark brown in Aridelus rutilipes (Fig. 6A View Figure 6 )). This species also resembles A. dubius Belokobylskij, but differs in having the antenna gradually darkened towards the apex (Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ) (in Aridelus dubius uniformly reddish brown, not darkened towards the apex (Fig. 1A View Figure 1 )), the penultimate antennal segment stouter (in Aridelus rutilipoides , 1.2-1.3 × longer than wide (Fig. 7E View Figure 7 ), in Aridelus dubius 1.6-1.7 × (Fig. 1E View Figure 1 )), the face finely punctate laterally, transversely punctate-rugose medially (finely punctate in Aridelus dubius ), the malar suture indistinct or absent (distinct in Aridelus dubius ) the apical hyaline area of the fore wing comparatively large, almost reaching the apex of the marginal cell (Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ) (in Aridelus dubius comparatively small, not reaching the apex of the marginal cell (Fig. 1F View Figure 1 )), the vein m-cu of the fore wing antefurcal (Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ) (slightly postfurcal to interstitial in Aridelus dubius (Fig. 1F View Figure 1 )), and the hind femur slenderer, 4.6-5.2 times as long as wide (Fig. 7H View Figure 7 ) (4.1-4.3 times as long as wide in Aridelus dubius (Fig. 1G View Figure 1 )). This species is also similar to A. ussuriensis Belokobylskij, 1981 described from the Russian Far East, but differs in having the vertex densely punctate (vertex with distinct transverse striation in Aridelus ussuriensis ), the mesosoma black (mesosoma red except for the prothorax black in Aridelus ussuriensis ) and the metasoma entirely yellowish brown (metasoma black except for the red first metasomal tergite in Aridelus ussuriensis ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |