Architis cymatilis Carico, 1981
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1578.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1CA1CAB-1E51-4029-B0E8-DA9A5D204C66 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5098300 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B32614-485F-293D-6F98-56C19FA947FC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Architis cymatilis Carico, 1981 |
status |
|
Architis cymatilis Carico, 1981 View in CoL
Figures 3A–D View FIGURES 3 , 4C–E View FIGURES 4 , 6 View FIGURE 6
Architis cymatilis Carico 1981: 144–145 View in CoL , figs 6, 11, 18–19, 28–29, map 2, tables 1–2. Brignoli 1983: 700; Platnick 1989: 394.
Architis nitidopilosa Carico 1981 View in CoL (in part): 143–144, figs 26–27 (mislabeled as A. tenuis View in CoL in legend), tables 1–2 (mislabeled as A. tenuis View in CoL in legend).
Architis suarez Carico 1989: 223 View in CoL , figs 4–5, table 1. Platnick 1993: 515. New Synonymy.
Type material. Holotype of Architis cymatilis Carico 1981 : male, Blue Basin , Port of Spain, Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago, 10 o 39’N, 61 o 31’W, 2 July 1926, A. Petrunkevitch ( PMY) (not examined) GoogleMaps . Paratype of Architis cymatilis Carico 1981 : female, data as holotype ( PMY) (not examined) GoogleMaps . Holotype of Architis suarez Carico, 1989 : male, Río Suarez , Colombia, October 1946, 1000 m elev. ( AMNH)(examined) .
Additional material examined. BRAZIL: Acre: Sena Madureira (Rio Purus, Boca do Chandless ), 9 o 4’S, 68 o 40’W, 5 September 1973, B. Patterson, 1♀ ( MCZ) GoogleMaps ; Senador Guiomar ( Reserva Extrativista Catuaba ), 10 o 10’S, 67 o 49’W, E. Morato, 2♂ ( IBSP) GoogleMaps ; Juazeiro ( Parque Nacional da Serra do Divisor ), 9 o 24’S, 73 o 12’W, 23 November 1996, R.S. Vieira, 1♀ ( IBSP 8984 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Pará: Novo Progresso , 07º09’07”S, 55º18’20”W, 22 November 2005, D.F. Candiani, 1♀ ( MPEG 2909 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Rondônia: Ouro Preto do Oeste , 10 o 40’S, 62 o 18’W, 14–22 October 1986, J. Becker, 1♂ ( MNRJ) GoogleMaps . Mato Grosso: Sinop , 11 o 52’S, 55 o 37’W, October 1976, M. Alvarenga, 3♂ ( AMNH) GoogleMaps . COLOMBIA: Amazonas: Leticia ( Via Tarapacá , Km. 9), 4 o 12’S 69 o 16’W, 6.XI.2001, E. Flórez coll., 1♀ ( ICN 1213 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 11.XI.2001, 1♂ ( ICN 1170 View Materials ) . ECUADOR: Francisco de Orellana: ( Reserva Étnica Waorani , 1 km S Onkone Gare Camp), 00º39’25.7”S, 76º27’10.8”W, 20 January 1994, T.L. Erwin et al., 3♂, 5♀ ( USNM) GoogleMaps , 1♂, 1♀ ( IBSP 62888 View Materials ) . PERU: Huanuco: Tingo Maria , 9 o 18’S, 75 o 58’W, 21 October 1946, J.C. Pallister, 2♀ ( AMNH) GoogleMaps . Loreto: Iquitos , 3 o 44’S, 73 o 14’W, May 1920, S. Parrish, 1♀ ( MCZ) GoogleMaps ; Pithecia ( Parque Nacional Pacaya-Samiria ), 9–27 May 1990, T.L. Erwin & D. Silva, 5♂, 8♀ ( MUSM) . Madre de Dios: (Parque Nacional Manu, Zona Reserva Pakitza ), 11º56’S, 71º17’W, 24 September–9 October 1987, 4♂, 2♀ ( USNM) GoogleMaps . Pasco: Huancabamba ( Quebrada Chispa , NW of Iscozacin), 10 o 29’S, 76 o 2’W 1 November 1986, D. Silva, 1♀ ( MUSM) GoogleMaps . TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: Arima: Arima ( Spring Hill , AWNC), 10 o 37’N, 61 o 16’W, 12 July 1979, L.N. Sorkin, 1♀ ( AMNH) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Architis cymatilis is a close relative of A. tenuis , with which it shares the presence of ventral cuspule-like spines on male coxae I ( Fig. 4E View FIGURES 4 ) and the prolaterally curved conductor of the male pedipalpus ( Figs 4B, D View FIGURES 4 ). The males can be distinguished by the small, pointed vRTA ( Figs 3A–B View FIGURES 3 , 4C View FIGURES 4 ) in A. cymatilis . The female epigynum, in contrast to all other Architis , presents no clear differentiation between MF and LL and has a pair of lateral rounded atria formed by the lateral folds ( Fig. 3C View FIGURES 3 ).
Description
Male (based on IBSP 62888 from Reserva Étnica Waorani, Ecuador)
Carapace brown, with paler lateral longitudinal stripes and sparsely covered with white setae. Posterior margin densely covered with dark setae. Anterior eye row procurved, lateral eyes strongly projected ventrally and almost twice as large as medians. Posterior eyes of similar size ( Carico 1981; fig. 11). Clypeus brown, chelicerae dark brown, labium and endites red-brown. Sternum cream-coloured, with lateral black spots close to leg bases. Pedipalpi and legs cream-coloured. Legs with apical dark rings on femur, tibia and metatarsus. Opisthosoma dark gray, paler laterally and ventrally. Sides suffused with black spots. Venter with a median black stripe. Spinnerets pale brown, circled by a black pigment ring. Total length 3.1. Carapace 1.6 long, 1.3 wide. Tibia I length 3.9, II 4.1, III 2.5, IV 3.0. Opisthosoma 1.6 long, 0.9 wide.
Female (based on IBSP 62888 from Reserva Étnica Waorani, Ecuador)
Carapace brown, with a median and a pair of lateral cream-coloured stripes. Lateral stripes with small lateral extensions close to leg bases. Eye configuration as male. Clypeus, chelicerae and endites cream-coloured, labium dark brown. Sternum cream-coloured, with lateral black spots close to leg bases. Pedipalpi and legs cream-coloured. Legs with apical dark rings on femur, tibia and metatarsus. Opisthosoma dark gray, paler laterally and ventrally. Sides suffused with black spots. Venter with a median black stripe. Spinnerets pale brown, circled by a black pigment ring. Total length 4.0. Carapace 1.8 long, 1.5 wide. Tibia I length 2.4, II 2.6, III 1.9, IV 2.9. Opisthosoma 2.2 long, 1.2 wide.
Variation. Males, total length 3.1–4.3, carapace width 1.3–1.5. Females, total length 4.0–5.0, carapace width 1.5–1.8. The lateral atria of the epigynum and the sclerotised case of the CD are variable in size ( Fig. 3D View FIGURES 3 ; Carico 1981: figs 26–29), although the configuration illustrated here is the most common.
Remarks. In the illustrations of Carico (1981), females of A. cymatilis and A. nitidopilosa differed only in the relative size of the lateral atria (compare Carico 1981; figs 26, 28) and the size of the sclerotised cases of the CD (misidentified as additional spermathecae; figs 27, 29). In this study, both configurations, as well as some intermediate forms, were observed in females collected together with males of A. cymatilis . Thus, these configurations are considered intra-specific variation. A similar situation was observed for the male genitalia. Carico (1989) based the distinction between A. cymatilis and A. suarez on differences in the relative leg length (larger in A. suarez male) and some features of the male pedipalpus These pedipalpal characters were not clearly specified, but they are apparent in the relative sizes of vRTA, conductor and embolus (compare Carico 1981: fig. 18 and Carico 1989: fig. 4). After examining a larger sample of specimens, I came to the conclusion that these features vary continuously between specimens and therefore these differences are considered intraspecific variations. Consequently, I consider A. suarez a junior synonym of A. cymatilis .
Natural history. The label of the type specimens of A. cymatilis states that they were collected in “recticular” webs on low vegetation ( Carico 1981). The female from Arima, Trinidad and Tobago ( AMNH) was collected on vegetation during a nocturnal search .
Distribution. Northern South America to central Brazil ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Architis cymatilis Carico, 1981
Santos, Adalberto J. 2007 |
Architis suarez
Platnick, N. I. 1993: 515 |
Carico, J. E. 1989: 223 |
Architis cymatilis Carico 1981: 144–145
Platnick, N. I. 1989: 394 |
Brignoli, P. M. 1983: 700 |
Carico, J. E. 1981: 145 |