Anthidium (Proanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4867.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:32B4ABB2-F744-4160-BD6D-DBA3C038209D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4417439 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ECDE2C-FF88-FFBA-FF51-FDFF2A81FCAE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anthidium (Proanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911 ) |
status |
|
Anthidium (Proanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911) View in CoL
( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 a–h, female; Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 a–j, male)
Proanthidium kashgarense Cockerell, 1911: 250 View in CoL , ♀.
Trachusa (Paraanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911) : Wu, 2006: 173, ♀ (key), 179, ♀ (redescription).
Anthidium (Proanthidium) oblongatum Latreille, 1809 View in CoL : Wu, 2006: 166, ♀ (key), ♂ (key), 169, ♀, ♂ (redescription), Fig. 90. (misidentification, erroneous nomenclator and original publication date).
Anthidium (Proanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911) View in CoL : Kasparek, 2017: 17.
Diagnosis: This species is very similar to Anthidium (Proanthidium) oblongatum ( Latreille, 1809) and can be distinguished from A. (P.) oblongatum by the following combination of characters: female F1 about 2.0X as long as broad ( Fig. 37d View FIGURE 37 ), male F1 about 1.8X as long as broad ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ), anterior surface of the male F1–F2 and the female F2–F4 reddish-brown, propodeal triangle with dense punctures, apical process of male S8 sub-triangular and rounded apically ( Fig. 38h View FIGURE 38 ).
Description: Male (new). BL = 10.8–11.5 mm ( Fig. 38a View FIGURE 38 ); head broader than long, HW: HL = 82: 68 ( Fig. 38b View FIGURE 38 ); gena slightly broader than eye, GW: EW = 20: 18. Clypeus nearly as broad as long, with longitudinal smooth area medially, apical margin of clypeus smooth, straight medially ( Fig. 38b View FIGURE 38 ); mandible with three teeth, apical one sharp, longest, third one broad, blunt; F1 about 1.8 times as long as broad, shorter than F2 + F3 together ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ); omaular carina absent; pronotal lobe lamellate anteriorly; scutellum with small triangulate tooth posterolaterally, greatly overhanging metanotum and propodeum ( Fig. 38d View FIGURE 38 ); propodeum without fovea behind spiracle; fore wing with two submarginal cells, cells nearly equal in length, second recurrent vein meets distal to second submarginal crossvein; arolia absent; apical margin of S6 slightly emarginated, without lateral lobe, and median lobe slight projected ( Fig. 38g View FIGURE 38 ); apical process of S8 sub-triangular, rounded apically ( Fig. 38h View FIGURE 38 ); T6 with midapical projection on distal margin, lateral spine distinct long and sharp ( Fig. 38f View FIGURE 38 ); T7 without median spine, lateral lobe with outer margin broadly convex, inner margin nearly straight ( Fig. 38f View FIGURE 38 ); genitalia shown in Fig. 38i View FIGURE 38 (in dorsal view), gonostylus broad and rounded apically ( Fig. 38i View FIGURE 38 ); hind trochanteric spine short and blunt ( Fig. 38j View FIGURE 38 ). T1–T6 with broadly interrupted yellowish-brown bands, becoming progressively closer on apical, forming distinctive black, broad V-shaped area across terga ( Fig. 38e View FIGURE 38 ). Integument black, except reddish-brown on anterior surface of F1 and F2 ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ), apical margin of scutellum (part, Fig. 38 View FIGURE 38 d-1); dark blackish brown on anterior surface of F3–F11 ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ); yellow on clypeus, lower part of paraocular area and outer surface of mandible except teeth ( Fig. 38b View FIGURE 38 ); yellowish-brown on one large marking on vertex near apex of eye, tegula, ventral parts of middle and hind coxae, femora, tarsi, basitarsi, and lateral part of T7 ( Fig. 38f View FIGURE 38 ); blackish-brown on teeth ( Fig. 38b View FIGURE 38 ), fore coxa, and trochanters ( Fig. 38j View FIGURE 38 ); dark brownish on sterna ( Fig. 38g View FIGURE 38 ). Fore wing hyaline, veins brownish and stigma dark brownish. Lower part of face, gena, and lower part of mesepisternum covered with long and dense white pubescence ( Fig. 38b View FIGURE 38 ); vertex, scutum, and scutellum covered long and sparse pale yellowish-white pubescence ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 , Fig. 38d View FIGURE 38 ); lateral side of metasomal terga covered with long and dense yellowish pubescence; apical margin of S4 covered with dense yellowishbrown pubescence, not forming brush, apical lateral margin of S5 covered long yellowish-brown pubescence ( Fig. 38g View FIGURE 38 ); outer surface of basitarsi covered with long and sparse yellowish-white hair, inner surface of basitarsi covered with short and dense golden hair; coxae, trochanters, femora and tibiae covered with long sparse pale yellowishwhite hair, and outer apical margin of hind tibiae covered with short and dense white pubescence.
Material examined: China, Hebei: Zhangjiakou (40º42′N, 114º48′E), 1 ♂, 28. VI GoogleMaps .1973, leg. Ju-Peng LIU; Chi- na, Inner Mongolia: Bayannur Meng, Urad Houqi (41º06′N, 107º05′E), 1 ♂, 4.VII.1986, leg. Zi-Hai ZHANG GoogleMaps ; Alax Meng, Bayan Hot, Helan Shan , Shuimogou (38º51′N, 105º41′E), 1 ♂, 1, ♀, 11.VII.2010, leg. Yan-Hui ZHAO GoogleMaps ; So- nid Youqi (43º42′N, 112º42′E), 1 ♀, VI GoogleMaps .1962, leg. no information on the label, 1200 m, 1 ♀, 23.VII.1963, leg. no in- formation on the label; Hohhot Shi (40º48′N, 111º42′E), 1 ♀ (on flower of Hedysarum mongolicum ), 30.VIII.1989, leg. Huan-Li XU GoogleMaps ; Ulan Qab Shi, Morin Dawa Qi (41º01′N, 113º06′E), 1 ♀, 5.VII.1987, leg. Xiao-Ping ZHANG GoogleMaps ; China, Xinjiang: Aksu (42º42′N, 80º42′E), 1180 m, 1 ♀, 21. VI GoogleMaps .1978, leg. Xue-Zhong ZHANG; Yecheng Xian (37º48′N, 77º18′E), 1970 m, 3 ♀, 31. V GoogleMaps .1959, leg. Shu-Yong WANG; Taxkorgan, Kalaqigu (37º13′N, 75º23′E), 3550 m, 1 ♀, 11.VIII.1989, leg. Xue-Zhong ZHANG GoogleMaps .
Type locality. China: Xinjiang Uygur: Kashgar .
Distribution: China (Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang).
Floral association: Hedysarum mongolicum (Fagaceae) .
Remarks: The male is described for the first time here. Wu (2006) misidentified some female specimens as A. (P.) oblongatum ( Latreille, 1809) , but the female F1 is about 2.0X as long as broad ( Fig. 37d View FIGURE 37 ), the male F1 is about 1.8X as long as broad ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ), the anterior surface of the male F1–F2 and the female F2–F4 are reddish-brown, propodeal triangle with dense punctures, apical process of male S8 is sub-triangular and rounded apically ( Fig. 38h View FIGURE 38 ), and these characters separate this species from A. (P.) oblongatum ( Illiger, 1806) (F1 of female and male about 1.4X as long as broad, the color of flegellomere is black, propodeal triangle of female shiny, nearly smooth, apical process of male S8 subquadrate, truncate apically). Consequently, A. (P.) oblongatum ( Illiger, 1806) does not currently occur in China, although Ebmer (2010) thought it occurs in Xinjiang of China.
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Apoidea |
Family |
|
Tribe |
Anthidiini |
Genus |
Anthidium (Proanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911 )
Niu, Ze-Qing, Yuan, Feng, Ascher, John S., Kasparek, Max, Orr, Michael C., Griswold, Terry & Zhu, Chao-Dong 2020 |
Anthidium (Proanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911 )
Kasparek, M. 2017: 17 |
Trachusa (Paraanthidium) kashgarense ( Cockerell, 1911 )
Wu, Y. - R. 2006: 173 |
Anthidium (Proanthidium) oblongatum
Wu, Y. - R. 2006: 166 |
Proanthidium kashgarense
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1911: 250 |