Anapistula panensis Lin, Tao & S. Li, 2013
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1130.91467 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:991C7618-4FD0-4191-A411-9F6AB775D3AF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D65CF3D4-2C89-5E54-AE2B-17713D135C49 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Anapistula panensis Lin, Tao & S. Li, 2013 |
status |
|
Anapistula panensis Lin, Tao & S. Li, 2013 View in CoL View at ENA
Figs 3C, F, I, L View Figure 3 , 6A-E View Figure 6 , 9A-D View Figure 9
Anapistula panensis Lin, Tao & Li, 2013: 53, figs 1-5 (♂♀).
Type material.
Holotype ♂ and paratypes 1♂ 50♀ (IZCAS) from China: Guizhou Province, Liupanshui City, Pan County, Zhudong Township, Shiliping Village, Shenxian Cave (25.62367°N, 104.75653°E, 1687 m), 15.IV.2007, J. Liu & Y. Lin leg. Examined.
Other material examined.
51♀ 18 juvs (NHMSU-HA020) from China: same data as type locality, 26.IV.2010, Y. Lin & Q. Zhao leg. ; 1♂ 67♀ 20 juvs (NHMSU-QX003) same data as type locality, 24.VIII.2020, Y. Lin et al. leg .; 1♀ 1 juv (NHMSU-HA020) used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers given in Table 2 View Table 2 , same data as for preceding .
Diagnosis.
The male of A. panensis is similar to that of A. choojaiae in the shape of the palp and in having C1 and C2 roughly equal in length, but it differs by a narrower C1 and a wider C2, a longer embolus, and having three setae on the paracymbium (vs. two; cf. Figs 6A, B View Figure 6 , 9A, B View Figure 9 ; Lin et al. 2013: figs 1, 2 with Rivera-Quiroz et al. 2021: figs 7c, 9a, b). The female differs from most Anapistula species by the Y-shaped epigynal median duct; it shares this character with A. orbisterna , A. secreta , A. bifurcate , A. tonga , A. choojaiae , A. equatoriana , A. zhengi , A. sanjiao sp. nov. and A. walayaku sp. nov. Anapistula panensis differs from all of these by the width and length of the MD, the length of the lateral branches, and the shape and relative size of the atrium (Figs 6C-E View Figure 6 , 9C, D View Figure 9 and Lin et al. 2013: figs 3, 4 vs. Forster and Platnick 1977: fig. 19; Harvey 1998: figs 9, 19; Rivera-Quiroz et al. 2021: figs 8d, 9c; Dupérré and Tapia 2017: fig. 33; Lin et al. 2013: figs 8, 9).
Redescription.
Male: habitus as in Fig. 3C, F View Figure 3 . Body yellow. Legs pale yellow. Carapace nearly round, cephalic area moderately elevated. Four vestigial eyes in diads. Chelicerae distinctly sclerotized and fused basally, concave at inner margins, with two promarginal teeth. Endites as long as wide. Labium rectangular, length ca equal to ⅓ of width, fused to sternum. Sternum flat, with sparse setae, truncated posteriorly. Femur I and II swollen retrolatero-basally, tiny serrations and granulations on surface. Patellae I-IV each with a distal-dorsal seta. Abdomen ovoid dorsally, higher than long, covered with sparse, grey, long setae, posterior expanded beyond spinnerets. Colulus absent. Somatic measurement: body length 0.56, carapace 0.28 long, 0.28 wide, 0.24 high; sternum 0.20 long, 0.24 wide; abdomen 0.32 long, 0.28 wide, 0.36 high; length of legs: I 1.18 (0.34, 0.14, 0.26, 0.14, 0.30), II 0.96 (0.28, 0.12, 0.18, 0.12, 0.26), III 0.80 (0.20, 0.10, 0.16, 0.10, 0.24), IV 0.98 (0.30, 0.12, 0.18, 0.16, 0.22); leg formula I-IV-II-III.
Palp: small and weakly sclerotized. Femur slightly swollen distally, with a long seta at retrolateral base. Patella short, semilunar shaped. Tibia contracted proximally, broad distally. Cymbium transparent, with 7 retrolateral short and 2 dorsal long setae. Conductor sheet shaped, with two projections (C1 and C2), C1 sharp, C2 lamellar, nearly invisible. Embolus short, needle shaped, posterior to conductor. Sd coiled ca 2 times inside bulb (Figs 6A, B View Figure 6 , 9A, B View Figure 9 ).
Female: habitus see Fig. 3I, L View Figure 3 . Carapace darker yellow than abdomen. Palps absent, others as in male. Somatic measurements: body length 0.68, carapace 0.28 long, 0.28 wide, 0.24 high; sternum 0.20 long, 0.18 wide; abdomen 0.50 long, 0.52 wide, 0.52 high; length of legs: I 1.18 (0.36, 0.14, 0.24, 0.20, 0.24), II 1.08 (0.30, 0.14, 0.24, 0.18, 0.22), III 0.82 (0.18, 0.12, 0.16, 0.16, 0.20), IV 1.12 (0.30, 0.14, 0.26, 0.18, 0.24); leg formula I-IV-II-III.
Epigyne: flat, without scape. Atrium ovoid, narrower than space between spermathecae. Spermathecae spherical, separated by ca 1.3 × their diameter, obviously sclerotized (Figs 3L View Figure 3 , 6C View Figure 6 , 9C View Figure 9 ). Lateral branches diverging from MD, forming Y-shape (Figs 6D, E View Figure 6 , 9C, D View Figure 9 ), as wide as ⅓ of MD, as long as MD (Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ; Lin et al. 2013: figs 3, 4). Fertilization ducts very short, translucent, nearly invisible, Llb appear as tiny bumps distally on lateral branches (Figs 6D, E View Figure 6 , 9C, D View Figure 9 ).
Natural history.
This species spins a small, flat circular web in the crevices of stalagmites or stalactites in caves.
Distribution.
China (Guizhou) (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anapistula panensis Lin, Tao & S. Li, 2013
Wang, Shuqiao, Lu, Ying, Li, Ya, Li, Shuqiang & Lin, Yucheng 2022 |
Anapistula panensis
Lin, Tao & S. Li 2013 |