Amphidraus boomerang, Salgado & Ruiz, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4563.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:86E75433-D91B-48E5-9807-9A0A460EFCB3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5931660 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F987C0-8A71-0174-3AEE-8D0CFBCF4D6A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amphidraus boomerang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Amphidraus boomerang View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 7–8 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 , 14 View FIGURE 14
Type material. Holotype GoogleMaps : Ƌ from Fazenda Nazareth GoogleMaps , [4°45'03.4"S; 42°35'14.2"W], José de Freitas, Piauí, Brazil, 31.I.2004, V.O. Costa leg. ( MPEG 9881 View Materials ).
Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition and refers to embolic disc, boomerang-shaped ( Figs 7C View FIGURE 7 , 8A View FIGURE 8 ).
Diagnosis. A. boomerang sp. nov. differs from all Amphidraus species by having the embolic disc boomerangshaped, due its expanded retrolateral border ( Figs 7C View FIGURE 7 , 8A View FIGURE 8 ). The retrolateral triangular lamella on the embolus shaft of A. boomerang sp. nov. is also present in A. argentinensis Galiano, 1997 , near the emergence point of the embolic filament (see Galiano 1997: figs 9–10). A. boomerang sp. nov. can be distinguished from A. argentinensis by shape of the RvTA, large and with a ventral lobe in A. argentinensis ( Galiano 1997: fig. 11) and reduced in A. boomerang sp. nov. ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ).
Description. Male holotype (MPEG 9881). Total length: 3.08. Carapace 1.62 long, 1.07 wide and 0.85 high. Ocular quadrangle 0.83 long. Anterior eye row 1.17 wide, posterior 0.98 wide. Legs 4312. Length of leg: I 2.65 (0.82 + 1.01 + 0.82); II 2.49 (0.80 + 0.91 + 0.78); III 3.15 (0.99 + 1.05 + 1.11); IV 3.47 (1.02 + 1.21 + 1.24). Palp ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 C–F, 8A–D): femur and patella with no modifications; short RvTA with two apical teeth ( Figs 7D View FIGURE 7 , 8B View FIGURE 8 ); straight RTA with the same length of tibia and with membranous external border ( Figs 7D, 7F View FIGURE 7 , 8B, 8D View FIGURE 8 ); cymbium oval, with proximal dorso-prolateral portion prominent ( Figs 7F View FIGURE 7 , 8D View FIGURE 8 ); tegulum with thick and straight lobe ( Figs 7C View FIGURE 7 , 8A View FIGURE 8 ); embolic disc with a process with acute tip (dPED) placed on the median distal portion and projected to prolateral side, with a ventral process (vPED) ventrally projected and with a proximal process (pPED) projected to proximal side, hidden under the tegulum ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 C–E, 8A, 8C); embolus shaft (e) with tip curved to retrolateral side and with two processes: a triangular lamella placed at the middle of retrolateral border and a rounded basal process ( Figs 7C View FIGURE 7 , 8A View FIGURE 8 ); embolic filament (ef) approximately 1/2 the length of embolus shaft ( Figs 7C View FIGURE 7 , 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Color in alcohol ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 A–B): cephalic area black; thoracic area brown with light brown longitudinal stripe; abdomen dorsally variegated with light brown and with longitudinal stripe of white setae; ventrally pale; pale legs.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality (state of Piauí) ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Salticinae |
Tribe |
Euophryini |
Genus |