Amphidraus araripe, Salgado & Ruiz, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4563.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:86E75433-D91B-48E5-9807-9A0A460EFCB3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5931669 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F987C0-8A7B-017C-3AEE-8DA0FBA94A95 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amphidraus araripe |
status |
sp. nov. |
Amphidraus araripe View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 11–14 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14
Type material. Holotype: Ƌ GoogleMaps from Floresta Nacional do Araripe-Apodi GoogleMaps , 7°18'39.6"S, 39°26'49.2"W, Crato, Ceará, Brazil, 06.II.2011, L.S. Carvalho et al. leg. ( MPEG 35011 View Materials ); Paratypes: 1 Ƌ and 1♀ from Parque Nacional de Ubajara , Trilha da Samambaia, 3°50'19.4"S, 40°53'58.6"W, Ubajara, Ceará, Brazil, 14.V.2013, L.S. Carvalho et al. leg. ( UFMG 14887 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition taken from the locality of the holotype.
Diagnosis. Among all species of Amphidraus , A. araripe sp. nov. is most similar to A. pulvinus Salgado & Ruiz, 2017 by having the tegulum with small retrolateral spermophore loop (RSPL) ( Figs 11D View FIGURE 11 , 13B View FIGURE 13 ; see Salgado & Ruiz 2017: fig. 8C) and the same tibial apophysis pattern: the retroventral tibial apophysis (RvTA) and intercalary tibial apophysis (ITA) are short and blade-shaped (the ITA with an internal basal projection; black arrow in Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ; see also Salgado & Ruiz 2017: fig. 8D) and the RTA is linked to an inflated membrane ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 E–G, 13B–C; see Salgado & Ruiz: figs 8B, 8D). These species also have an embolic disc with a distal process projected to prolateral side and a ventral process projected to retrolateral side ( Figs 11C View FIGURE 11 , 13A View FIGURE 13 ; see Salgado & Ruiz 2017: fig. 8C). However, A. araripe sp. nov. can be distinguished by having the RvTA and ITA more separated from each other ( Figs 11F View FIGURE 11 , 13B View FIGURE 13 ), whereas these are almost fused in A. pulvinus (see Salgado & Ruiz 2017: fig. 8D). In addition, A. araripe sp. nov. has a vPED placed near the distal processes ( Figs 11C View FIGURE 11 , 13A View FIGURE 13 ), whereas in A. pulvinus the vPED is placed on the prolateral border of embolic disc (see Salgado & Ruiz 2017: fig. 8C). The female of A. pulvinus is unknown, but among the Amphidraus species currently known, the epigyne of A. araripe sp. nov. is most similar to that of A. manaura sp. nov., both with glands near copulatory openings and with epigynal plate with border slightly bilobed ( Figs 12C View FIGURE 12 , 13D View FIGURE 13 , 16D View FIGURE 16 , 17D View FIGURE 17 ). However, the female of A. araripe sp. nov. differs by having a longer copulatory duct (with one loop ventrally projected) and by having the less expanded border of epigynal plate ( Figs 13D View FIGURE 13 , 17D View FIGURE 17 ).
Description. Male holotype (MPEG 35011). Total length: 2.73. Carapace 1.32 long, 0.88 wide and 0.65 high. Ocular quadrangle 0.54 long. Anterior eye row 0.93 wide, posterior 0.81 wide. Legs 4312. Length of leg: I 2.09 (0.63 + 0.77 + 0.69); II 2.04 (0.62 + 0.70 + 0.72); III 2.50 (0.75 + 0.82 + 0.93); IV 2.78 (0.79 + 0.94 + 1.05). Palp ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 C–G, 13A–C): femur and patella without modifications; cymbium oval ( Fig. 13C View FIGURE 13 ); tegulum with thick lobe curved to prolateral side ( Figs 11C View FIGURE 11 , 13A View FIGURE 13 ); embolus shaft (e) strongly arched to prolateral side, with tip retrolaterally projected ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ); embolic filament (ef) short, with nearly half the length of embolus shaft ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ). Color in alcohol ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 A–B): cephalic area black; thoracic area brown with pale longitudinal stripe; abdomen dorsally variegated with brown, and with a pale longitudinal stripe bearing white setae; ventrally pale with posterior portion dark; legs pale.
Description. Female paratype (UFMG 14887). Total length: 2.95. Carapace 1.40 long, 0.97 wide and 0.67 high. Ocular quadrangle 0.68 long. Anterior eye row 1.02 wide, posterior 0.90 wide. Legs 4312. Length of leg: I 2.18 (0.71 + 0.82 + 0.65); II 2.06 (0.66 + 0.76 + 0.64); III 2.50 (0.79 + 0.86 + 0.85); IV 2.88 (0.81+ 0.99 + 1.08). Epigyne/vulva ( Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 C–D, 13D: copulatory openings separated by about two diameters of copulatory duct; spermathecae kidney-shaped; fertilization ducts anteriorly placed and laterally projected. Color in alcohol ( Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 A–B): cephalic area black; thoracic area dark brown with a longitudinal light brown stripe; abdomen dorsally black with longitudinal interrupted pale stripe; ventrally pale; femora pale with black spots; other leg segments light brown with black spots.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality (state of Ceará, Brazil) ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Salticinae |
Tribe |
Euophryini |
Genus |