Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919 )

Dupérré, Nadine, 2013, Taxonomic revision of the spider genera Agyneta and Tennesseellum (Araneae, Linyphiidae) of North America north of Mexico with a study of the embolic division within Micronetinae sensu Saaristo & Tanasevitch 1996, Zootaxa 3674 (1), pp. 1-189 : 44-47

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3674.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:981F80ED-96D7-40C7-8A3C-677954416A2E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162313

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038D6700-FF97-5639-118C-00B0AC4BB3B2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919 )
status

 

Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919) View in CoL

Figs 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 , 130–136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 , map 7

Microneta maritima Emerton 1919: 4 , pl. 1, f. 8–10. (Description 3).

Meioneta maritima Leech 1966: 186 , f. 62–64. (Transferred 3 from Microneta View in CoL , description Ƥ).

Meioneta alaskensis Holm 1960: 127 , f. 32–34. (Holotype 3, allotype Ƥ from Alaska, Meade River (157º:71º) 8-9 Aug. 1958, C. Lindroth, MCZ) EXAMINED.

Agyneta maritima Eskov 1992: 75 View in CoL , 81. (Transferred from Meioneta and Meioneta alaskensis Holm 1960 was synonomized with A. maritima View in CoL . This synonymy was rejected by Saaristo and Koponen 1998. SYNONYMY REAFFIRMED).

Agyneta alaskensis Saaristo & Koponen 1998: 574 View in CoL , f. 8A–C, E.

Diagnosis: Males are distinguished from most Agyneta by the bifid tip of their lamella characteristica ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). To distinguish from A. nigripes , see diagnosis of the latter. Females are distinguished from most Agyneta by the presence of a deep pit hook depression ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). From closely related species by their wider pit hook depression ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ), narrower in A. rurestris , A. jacksoni and A. dynica ( Figs 112 View FIGURES 108 – 115 , 120 View FIGURES 116 – 122 , 127 View FIGURES 123 – 129 , 141 View FIGURES 137 – 143 ).

Description: Male: Total length 2.06; carapace length 0.88, width 0.69.

MAP. 7. Localities of Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919) .

CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace dark brown, shiny, finely reticulate; suffused with dark gray along margin, radiating lines; trident mark present. Sternum brown strongly suffused with dark gray. Clypeus height 2. Chelicerae orange-brown, apical part lighter, strongly excavated; ~12 seta-tipped tubercles; promargin two denticles, retromargin three denticles, both margins with rounded projections near base of fang ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25 – 30. 25 ). Cheliceral stridulatory organ ~37 striae, well spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Uniformly dark gray. LEGS: Yellow-orange; leg I total length: 2.82; leg III total length: 2.13; Tm I: 0.24, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Palpal retrolateral tibial apophysis short, rugose; dorsal tibial apophysis wide, rugose; two retrolateral trichobothria and a dorsal one ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ); dorsal cymbial tubercle triangular, smooth; ventral cymbial tubercle absent; prolateral notch shallow ( Fig. 131 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Paracymbium apical pocket short, anterior and posterior pockets short and curved ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Embolus tip pointed, concave; dorso-ventrally spiny; basally with two spurs; Fickert’s gland absent; ventral lamella serrated, transparent; thumb short reaching well below the embolus proper ( Fig. 132 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Embolus proper set apically, dorsal part wider and serrated ( Fig. 132 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Anterior terminal apophysis narrow with long protrusions; posterior terminal apophysis wide, striate; lamella characteristica large, margin dentate basally, ending in four large spikes ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ).

Female: Total length 2.16; carapace length 0.81, width 0.63.

CEPHALOTHORAX: Same coloration as male. Chelicerae yellow; promargin four teeth, retromargin five denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ visible ~26 striae, well spaced. ABDOMEN: Same as male. LEGS: Same as male; palpal tibia and tarsus brownish, tarsal claw absent; leg I total length: 2.81; leg III total length: 2.21; Tm I: 0.26; Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Epigynum with wide proximal part of scape, sides straight and vertical; epigynal slits oval and short; pit hook depression deep ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ); lateral lobes wide and short; stretcher seemingly absent ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Median part of scape long and wide with constrictions; genital pores situated at base of lateral lobes pockets ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ). Internal genitalia with a rounded ventral receptacula and a small, oval dorsal one ( Figs 135, 136 View FIGURES 130 – 136 ).

Other material examined: CANADA: Northwest Territories: Norman Wells, 25.vi.1949, 231Ƥ, W. Mason ( CNC). Nunavut: Baker Lake, 14.vii.1947, 131Ƥ, T. Freeman ( AMNH); Ellesmere Island, 04.vii.1980, 23, J.R. Smith ( CNC); Hazen Camp, 06.vi.1963, 131Ƥ, 10.vii.1964, 131Ƥ, 16.vi.1964, 23, 20.vi.1964, 233Ƥ, 28.vi.1964, 1Ƥ, 02.viii.1964, 3Ƥ, R. Leech ( CNC); Rasmussen Basin, 08.viii.1977, cotton grass meadow, 131Ƥ, T. Hogg ( DBC); Truelove Inlet, Devon Island, 16–21. vi.1973, 1 Ƥ, J. Daley ( DBC). USA: Alaska: Brooks Range, Araktuvuk Pass, on mountain, 3.2km W of village, 16.viii.1960, along stream, 1Ƥ, A. Holm, O. Martensson ( AMNH); Brooks Range, Feniak Lake, 02.viii.1961, 131Ƥ, A. Holm, O. Martensson ( AMNH); North Slope Brgh., Meade River, 96km S Barrow, 06.vi.1978, 23, 15.vi.1978, 332Ƥ, 17.vi.1978, 131Ƥ, 24.vi.1978, 131Ƥ, 27.vi.1978, 131Ƥ, 02.vii.1978, 731Ƥ, 05.vii.1978, 1Ƥ, 11.vii.1978, 233Ƥ, 20.vii.1978, 436Ƥ, 20.viii.1978, 2Ƥ, 10.viii.1980, 1Ƥ, B. Vogel ( AMNH); North Slope, lake, 1.6km W Jago river, 23.vii–06.viii.1962, tundra, 131Ƥ, C. Lewis ( AMNH); SW Rock Mountain, 1264m, 13–14.vi.1994, pitfalls, alpine tundra, E. West ( UWBM); Yukon Border, Firth River, E facing slope of Mountain, 1.6km SE Mancha Creek, 12.viii.1961, limestone, 2Ƥ, K. Stone ( AMNH).

Distribution: Siberian-Nearctic ( Tanasevitch & Koponen 2007).

Note: After examining the holotypes of A. maritima and A. alaskensis , studying the palpal embolic division and the female internal genitalia of many specimens from Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Alaska, I found no consistent morphological differences suggesting two distinct species. I did observed the variation in size, carapace color and serration of the male palpal lamella characteristica mentioned by Saaristo & Koponen 1998 (p. 572, 574; figs 6, 8). But those minor morphological differences fall within the range of variation observed in other species of Agyneta (eg. A. fillmorana , A. sheffordiana , A. amersaxatilis ), therefore A. alaskensis synonymy with A. maritima is reaffirmed following Eskov (1994).

CNC

Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

DBC

University College

UWBM

University of Washington, Burke Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Linyphiidae

SubFamily

Micronetinae

Genus

Agyneta

Loc

Agyneta maritima ( Emerton 1919 )

Dupérré, Nadine 2013
2013
Loc

Agyneta alaskensis

Saaristo 1998: 574
1998
Loc

Agyneta maritima

Eskov 1992: 75
1992
Loc

Meioneta alaskensis

Holm 1960: 127
1960
Loc

Microneta maritima

Emerton 1919: 4
1919
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF