Actinopus smuzikae Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5597918 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF95-CE45-FF77-FA62DFDC3428 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Actinopus smuzikae Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 |
status |
|
Actinopus smuzikae Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
Actinopus szumikae Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 66 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 34 A–G, 35 A–F, 45 (holotype ♂, [31º 39’ S 64º 25’ W], Alta Gracia “La Granja”, Córdoba, Argentina, i.1939, C. Brunch leg., MACN-Ar 36564; paratype ♀, [31º 24’ S 64º 31’ W], Carlos Paz, La Cruz, Córdoba, Argentina, i.1939, C. Brunch leg., MACN-Ar 27111; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.
Diagnosis. Males of A. smuzikae ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 34 D–F) are characterized by PA continuous to PI; PA more pronounced than A. apalai ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A–C) and A. mairinquensis ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 A–C) and BTA in the middle of the width of tegulum as in A. apalai ; serrated area represented by four cusps distal to PI. They differ from A. apalai by more developed PA and from A. mairinquensis by slender PA. They differ from those of the other two species of group apalai by absence of abdominal scutum and by shorter PS. Females of A. smuzikae (Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 35 D–E) resemble those of A. paraitinga ( Fig. 59 D View FIGURE 59 ), A. itapitocai ( Fig. 83 D View FIGURE 83 ), A. dubiomaculatus ( Fig. 112 View FIGURE 112 D–H), A. laventana ( Fig. 129 D View FIGURE 129 ), A. itacolomi ( Fig. 153 D View FIGURE 153 ), A. princeps ( Fig. 217 View FIGURE 217 A–D) and A. taragui ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 37 D–E) by the shape of spermathecae, with two receptacles and lateral lobes longer than inner lobes. A. smuzikae resemble A. itapitocai and A. taragui by the absence of lateral swellings on inner lateral lobes of receptacles. females of A. smuzikae differ from all other species of the genus by long external lobes curved outward.
Description. See Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018: 66).
Distribution. ARGENTINA: Córdoba, Buenos Aires, Santa Fe, and Corrientes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Actinopus smuzikae Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2020 |