Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4314/met.v32i1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14198003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FC7387C2-1058-FFA4-C955-059B1BBAC537 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920 ) |
status |
|
Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920)
( Figs 20‒21 View Figures 18–31 , genitalia Figs 37‒38, 46)
Cerura bifasciata Janse, 1920: 171 .
Afrocerura leonensis bifasciata ( Janse, 1920) View in CoL : Kiriakoff, 1963: 213.
Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920) : Schintlmeister & Witt, 2015: 31.
Name bearing type:
Holotype ♀ ( Fig. 20 View Figures 18–31 ): “// Cerura / bifasciata Janse. [handwritten] / Type No. 1655 [number handwritten] // S. Rhodesia / ex. Bulaw. Mus. [handwritten] // Photo done by / A. SCHINTLMEISTER / #25.977 [yellow label]//” ( TMSA).
Additional material examined: (all ANHRT) ZAMBIA. 1♂ – 1400 m, Kankonde Camp , Mutinondo Stream, 12°23′29″S, 31°19′24″E, 12‒15.xi.2014, MV Light Trap, leg. Smith, R. & Takano, H., ANHRT:2017.12, ANHRTUK00073573 , Gen. slide No. LG5364 ♂; GoogleMaps 1♂ – 1197 m, Bufumu Forest , Kasanka National Park, 12°29′50″S, 30°11′31″E, 1.xii.2012, Actinic Light, leg. Smith, R. & Takano, H., ANHRT:2017.7, ANHRTUK00073572 , Gen. slide No. LG5363 ♂; GoogleMaps 1♂ – 1340 m, Jiwundu swamp, 11°51′54″S, 25°33′20″E, 21‒24. xi.2014, MV Light Trap, leg. Smith, R. & Takano, H., ANHRT:2017.12, ANHRTUK00010143 , ANHRT GEN. SLIDE NO. 00313 ♂; GoogleMaps 2♀♀ – 1179 m, Greystone, Kitwe , Copperbelt Province, 12°55′50″S, 28°14′29″E, 17‒18.xi.2014, MV Light Trap, leg. Smith, R. & Takano, H., ANHRT:2017.12, ANHRTUK00043083 GoogleMaps and ANHRTUK00042917 , ANHRT GEN. SLIDE NO. 00316 ♀. GoogleMaps
Remarks
This species was originally described from a single female specimen from Zimbabwe. Kiriakoff (1963: 214) designated a (redundant) neallotype (NHMUK) and transferred bifasciata to the genus Afrocerura as a subspecies of A. leonensis . Schintlmeister & Witt (2015) considered bifasciata to be a good species, a view which is upheld here. As previously stated under leonensis , the morphological differences between the genitalia of leonensis and bifasciata are found to be distinctive enough to consider them as being separate species. The male genitalia and habitus of true bifasciata are illustrated here for the first time (Figs 37‒38, 21).
Distribution
The specimens collected in Zambia represent a new country record. The species is now known from Zimbabwe, Tanzania (De Prins & De Prins, 2019) and Zambia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920 )
Mulvaney, Lydia R. J. 2021 |
Afrocerura leonensis bifasciata ( Janse, 1920 )
KIRIAKOFF, S. G. 1963: 213 |
Cerura bifasciata
JANSE, A. J. T. 1920: 171 |
Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920 )
Afrocerura bifasciata bifasciata ( Janse, 1920 ) : Schintlmeister & Witt, 2015: 31 . |