Onycholyda kumamotonis ( Matsumura, 1912 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5167.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C140613-04F6-4227-B084-45851F42E039 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6903072 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB3C87F1-F24F-AC38-FF67-FD21FD00ADEA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Onycholyda kumamotonis ( Matsumura, 1912 ) |
status |
|
Onycholyda kumamotonis ( Matsumura, 1912)
( Figs 35 View FIGURE 35 , 36 View FIGURE 36 ) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11405067)
Lyda kumamotonis Matsumura, 1912: 75 .
Onycholyda kumamotonis: Beneš, 1972b: 387 ; Shinohara, 1985c: 716; Shinohara, 1987a: 499; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 398; Shinohara, 2002b: 422; Shinohara, 2004: 262; Shinohara & Lelej, 2007: 929; Taeger et al., 2010: 84; Sundukov & Lelej, 2012: 108; Sundukov, 2015: 249; Sundukov, 2017: 103; Shinohara, 2019: 7; Shinohara, 2020: 12, 236.
Onycholyda sp. : Shinohara & Okutani, 1983: 277.
Lectotype designation. Shinohara (1985d) treated a specimen in Matsumura’s collection in HU as the holotype, stating “ Matsumura (1912) described this species on the basis of a single female from Kiushu (Kumamoto)”. However, Matsumura (1912) did not give the actual number of the specimens examined and thus the specimen is a syntype. Here we designate this specimen as a lectotype. It is labeled “ Japan, Kumamoto, Matsumura, 7/18” (HU).
Material examined. About 355 specimens, including the lectotype. Two specimens are from the Russian Far East ( Shinohara 1985d).
Distribution. Russia (Sakhalin), Japan (Hokkaido, Kunashiri Is., Honshu,?Kyushu).
Host plant. Rosaceae : Filipendula camtschatica (Pall.) Maxim. ( Shinohara & Okutani 1983; Shinohara 1985c).
Remarks. This species is not rare around Filipendula camtschatica bushes in Hokkaido, where two species of Pamphilius , P. venustus ( Smith, 1874) and P. sapporensis ( Matsumura, 1912) also occur together. These three pamphiliids are all associated with Filipendula .
In the COI analysis ( Fig. 139 View FIGURE 139 ), three specimens from Hokkaido (NSMT30554, 30788, 30789) and four specimens from Honshu (NSMT30730, 30785–30787) each formed a different cluster and the two clusters had a sistergroup relationship supported by 100% UFBoot values. The maximum p -distance in the Hokkaido cluster was 0.2% and that in the Honshu cluster was 1%. The minimum p -distance between the Honshu and Hokkaido clusters was 2.2%. In the NaK tree ( Fig. 153 View FIGURE 153 ), the four Honshu specimens formed a cluster but the three Hokkaido specimens did not and, with the Honshu cluster, formed a polytomous clade, which was sister to O. armata (this clade, O. kumamotonis + O. armata , was supported by 100% UFBoot value). The maximum p -distance within O. kumamotonis was 0.4% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.2%, was O. armata . The Hokkaido and Honshu populations of O. kumamotonis certainly have some genetic divergence, but we will leave them as one species until more evidence of speciation becomes available.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Onycholyda kumamotonis ( Matsumura, 1912 )
Shinohara, Akihiko, Kramp, Katja & Taeger, Andreas 2022 |
Onycholyda kumamotonis: Beneš, 1972b: 387
Shinohara, A. 1987: 499 |
Shinohara, A. 1985: 716 |
Benes, K. 1972: 387 |
Lyda kumamotonis
Matsumura, S. 1912: 75 |