Pamphilius albopictus ( Thomson, 1871 )

Shinohara, Akihiko, Kramp, Katja & Taeger, Andreas, 2022, The Pamphiliinae of the Russian Far East and Korea (Hymenoptera, Pamphiliidae), Zootaxa 5167 (1), pp. 1-251 : 84-85

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5167.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C140613-04F6-4227-B084-45851F42E039
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14186016
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB3C87F1-F223-AC53-FF67-F9EDFE9AAFB0
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Pamphilius albopictus ( Thomson, 1871 )
status

Treatment

Pamphilius albopictus ( Thomson, 1871)

( Figs 50 View FIGURE 50 , 51 View FIGURE 51 ) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15709641)

Lyda albo-picta Thomson, 1871: 312 .

Lyda albopicta: André, 1881: 63 (syn. of L. depressa [= P. vafer ]).

Pamphilius albopictus: Kirby, 1882: 337 ; Konow, 1897a: 25, 31 (syn. of P. depressus [= P vafer ]); Kangas, 1961: 69; Kangas & Kangas, 1963: 267; Kangas & Kangas, 1965: 31; Beneš, 1976: 160; Achterberg & Aartsen, 1986: 36; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 397; Shinohara, 1998: 233; Taeger et al. 1998: 104; Shinohara, 2002b: 428; Shinohara, 2004: 264; Shinohara & Lelej, 2007: 940; Taeger et al., 2010: 85; Sundukov & Lelej, 2012: 108; Sundukov, 2017: 104; Lee et al., 2019: 8.

Pamphilius vafer: Malaise, 1931 , p. 63 (not Linné, 1767, in part).

Pamphilius altaicus Gussakovskij, 1935: 187 ; Beneš, 1976: 160 (syn. of P. albopictus ).

Pamphilius viridipes Achterberg & Aartsen, 1986: 45 ; Shinohara & Taeger, 1990: 95; Shinohara, 1998: 233 (syn. of P. albopictus ).

See Shinohara (1998) for more synonyms and references.

Material examined. Sixty-one specimens, including the lectotype and 38 specimens from the Russian Far East and South Korea ( Shinohara 1998; present work). New collection data: RUSSIA: Primorskij Kraj: 1♀ (DEIGISHym 32036), Zharikovo 4km N, 120m, 44.643°N 131.681°E, 3. VI. 2016, K. Kramp, M. Prous & A. Taeger, in alcohol, RU034 ( SDEI); GoogleMaps 1♀ ( Fig. 51 View FIGURE 51 , DEI-GISHym 86124), Gornotajozhnoe 1km E, 150m, 43.694°N 132.168°E, 19. V. 2016, K. Kramp, M. Prous & A. Taeger, RU006 ( SDEI). GoogleMaps SOUTH KOREA: Gangwon-do: 1♀, Mirugam (Bukdaesa), 1300m, Odaesan Mts ., 24. V. 2002, A. Shinohara ( NSMT); 2♀ (incl. NSMT 30865 View Materials ), same locality, 28. V.–1. VI. 2009, A. Shinohara ( NSMT).

Distribution. Europe across Siberia to Kamchatka Kraj and Primorskij Kraj, North and South Korea ( Shinohara 1998).

Host plant. Rosaceae : Padus avium Mill. ( Kangas 1961; Kangas & Kangas 1965).

Remarks. This is a widely distributed Eurosiberian species. It is probably thelytokous-parthenogenetic with no males ( Shinohara 1998), a rare case in the Pamphiliidae . Pamphilius albopictus is one of the three species of the Pamphiliidae known to be associated with Padus . The other two are P. kamikochensis Takeuchi, 1930 from Japan and P. padus Shinohara, 2016 , from Zhejiang Province, China ( Shinohara & Wei 2016).

Shinohara (1998) proposed the P. albopictus subgroup of the P. vafer group to include P. albopictus , P. kamikochensis and P. heecheonparki Shinohara, 1998 , from Korea and the Russian Far East, whereas Shinohara (2002b) recognized the P. albopictus subgroup ( P. albopictus and P. kamikochensis only) and the P. heecheonparki subgroup ( P. heecheonparki only). In our COI molecular analysis ( Fig. 148 View FIGURE 148 ), the P. albopictus subgroup s. str. ( P. albopictus , P. kamikochensis plus subsequently described P. leleji Shinohara & Taeger, 2007 ) was retrieved as monophyletic with 100% UFBoot support and this clade was recovered as sister to P. heecheonparki with 89% UFBoot support. In the NaK analysis ( Figs 160–161 View FIGURE 160 View FIGURE 161 ), both of the clades P. albopictus + P. kamikochensis and P. heecheonparki were recovered as monophyletic with 100% UFBoot support, but their relationships were not clearly resolved. The maximum intraspecific p -distance within P. albopictus was 0.8% in COI (n=4) and 0.2% in NaK (n=3) and the nearest neighbour was P. kamikochensis , diverging by a minimum of 2.2% in COI analysis and by a minimum of 0.4% in NaK analysis.