Bambara Vuillet, 1911
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.31184/M00138908.1554.3999 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:49640FBA-BC2D-48F7-84DA-65E90FB8F448 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3663663 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB2187F6-FFD1-FFDD-FDF6-FCC1F7AEFA82 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bambara Vuillet, 1911 |
status |
|
Bambara Vuillet, 1911 View in CoL
( Figs 4 View Fig A–I)
Remarks: Genus of small, fragile and weakly sclerotised insects, which are very difficult to mount and dissect without damage. As no reliable features have been detected in the external skeleton, differences in the form of the spermathecae have always been considered to be the best method of determining species. But there is undoubtedly considerable variety present in these organs, particularly amongst the parthenogenetic species, presumably as they evolve towards extinction (Darby 2014), so that these determinations require to be viewed with caution. Also, the spermathecae are often very faintly sclerotised and do not show up in dissections even when a microscope with differential interference contrast is used. Sometimes the presence of an air bubble is the only guide to shape. As a result it is possible that future research may show some of the species, particularly in the frosti, invisibilis group for example, to be varieties of the same species.
In dorsal view Bambara species are only likely to be confused with Babrama Johnson in the Ptiliini , from which they may be separated by the possession of adjacent metacoxae, and in the Acrotrichinae with some of the smaller, paler Acrotrichis from which they may be separated by the proportionately longer elytra covering the abdomen.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.