Cnodalonini Oken, 1843

Bouchard, Patrice, Bousquet, Yves, Davies, Anthony E., Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A., Lawrence, John F., Lyal, Chris H. C., Newton, Alfred F., Reid, Chris A. M., Schmitt, Michael, Ślipinski, S. Adam & Smith, Andrew B. T., 2011, Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta), ZooKeys 88, pp. 1-972 : 189-190

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FAF1CFC0-52C5-85DB-F3C0-58574B094F0C

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Cnodalonini Oken, 1843
status

 

Tribe Cnodalonini Oken, 1843

Cnodaliden Oken, 1843: 484 [stem: Cnodalon-]. Type genus: Cnodalon Latreille, 1797. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form and generally accepted as in Tulk (1847: 614, as Cnodalidae ); family-group name previously attributed to Gistel (1856a: 382); the correct stem based on Cnodalon is Cnodal -, therefore the original stem was correctly formed; however, since this family-group name has not been attributed to Oken (1843) in the past and the accepted stem has been Cnodalon - to this date, we have kept the currently accepted stem; an application to the Commission is necessary to conserve Cnodalon - as the correct stem for this taxon.

Coelometopidae Schaum, 1859: 71 [stem: Coelometop-]. Type genus: Coelometopus Solier, 1848. Comment: published before February 31, 1859; this family-group name was also used in the same year by Lacordaire (1859 [before 27 June]: 358, as Coelometopides ).

Upidae C. G. Thomson, 1859: 116 [stem: Upid-]. Type genus: Upis Fabricius, 1792. Comment: incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage.

Eutelides Lacordaire, 1859: 354 [stem: Eutel-]. Type genus: Eutelus Solier, 1843 [preoccupied genus name, not Eutelus Walker, 1834 [ Hymenoptera ]; syn. of Nodotelus Koch, 1950]. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by Pascoe (1866b: 469, as Eutelinae ), generally accepted as in Gebien (1911: 431, as Eutelinae ); permanently invalid (Art. 39): based on preoccupied type genus; Eutelini Ashmead, 1904 (type genus Eutelus Walker, 1834) is available in Hymenoptera .

Misolampides Lacordaire, 1859: 440 [stem: Misolamp-]. Type genus: Misolampus Latreille, 1807. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by and generally accepted as in F. Bates (1873: 373, as Misolampides [treated as Latin]).

Catapiestides Lacordaire, 1859: 381 [stem: Catapiest-]. Type genus: Catapiestus Perty, 1831. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form and generally accepted as in Seidlitz (1895: 614, as Catapiestina ).

*Camarides Desmarest, 1860: 165 [stem: Camari-]. Type genus: Camaria Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1828. Comment: original vernacular name unavailable (Art. 11.7.2): subsequently used in latinized form but not generally attributed to Desmarest (1860).

Polypleuri J. L. LeConte, 1862: 229 [stem: Polypleur-]. Type genus: Polypleurus Eschscholtz, 1831.

Misolampidiini Reitter, 1917: 60, in key [stem: Misolampidi-]. Type genus: Misolampidius Solsky, 1876.

Menephilini Reitter, 1920: 15 [stem: Menephil-]. Type genus: Menephilus Mulsant, 1854.

Stenophanini Reitter, 1922b: 2, 3 [stem: Stenophan-]. Type genus: Stenophanes Solsky, 1876.

Hegemonini Reitter, 1922b: 3 [stem: Hegemon-]. Type genus: Hegemona Laporte, 1840.

Camariinae Anonymous, 1924: 164 [stem: Camari-]. Type genus: Camaria Lepeletier and Audinet-Serville, 1828. Comment: this was a translation of the vernacular name " Camariinen " used by Gebien (1919); Gebien’s family-group name is not available since it was proposed in a vernacular form after 1899 (Art. 11.7.2); for comments about authorship of Camariinae see Evenhuis et al. (2008: 4).

Nodotelini Koch, 1950: 67 [stem: Nodotel-]. Type genus: Nodotelus Koch, 1950. Comment: replacement name for Eutelini Lacordaire, 1859 because of the homonymy of the type genus.

*Thesileini Kaszab, 1982: 29 [stem: Thesile-]. Type genus: Thesilea Haag-Rutenberg, 1878. Comment: unavailable family-group name, proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1).