Balcha Walker
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1033.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1D64688-2A79-49B9-B71E-B47CFD9D2DA5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10533026 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FA057931-5133-FFC5-FE99-F9887D7F77FD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Balcha Walker |
status |
|
Key to world species of Balcha Walker View in CoL View at ENA
1 Dorsellum thin and in single subvertical plane, coriaceous to punctate ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ) or with fine longitudinal rugae ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ), but entirely bare ... anemeta View in CoL speciesgroup ... ............................................................................................................................... 2
– Dorsellum thick, with short dorsal crenulate band at abrupt angle to more vertical, posterior coriaceous surface ( Figs. 45–48 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ), the coriaceous surface sometimes setose ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 )........................................................................................................ 5
2(1) Both sexes: propodeum with plical region setose ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ); scutellum variably punctatecoriaceous to rugulose and often with sculpture more or less aligned into longitudinal rugae anteriorly ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31–38 ).................................................................... 3
– Female only known: propodeum with plical region bare ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ); scutellum uniformly punctate, the subcircular punctures separated by mostly shiny interstices ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31–38 )..................................................................................................4
3(2) Acropleuron posterior to subalar region finely, longitudinally coriaceousaciculate, the surface appearing as if scratched with a pin ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 )........................ ................................................................................................. B. anemeta (Walker) View in CoL
– Acropleuron posterior to subalar region punctatereticulate, the surface distinctly sculptured except near posterior margin ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ) ............... B. levicollis (Cameron)
4(2) Head with parascrobal region reticulate, the multisided cells shallow and delineated by linear ridges (Fig. 4); mesoscutum reticulatealveolate to reticulate; syntergum short, only slightly longer than basal width and evenly tapered to apex; petiole almost smooth posterior to anterior carina, much smoother than sculptured part of propodeal plical region (cf. Fig. 45 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ) ............................. B. reticulifrons View in CoL n. sp.
– Head with parascrobal region punctate, the subcircular punctures separated by flat interstices; mesoscutum punctate to punctulate ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31–38 ); syntergum elongate and with submedial lateral notch differentiating basal section surrounding ovipositor sheaths from slender apical portion lying above sheaths ( Figs. 56, 57 View FIGURES 55–59. 55 ); petiole strongly crenulate, similar to propodeal plical region ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ) ............................... ............................................................................................... B. punctiscutum View in CoL n. sp.
5(1) Both sexes: propodeum with paraspiracular region setose ( Figs. 46 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 , 47 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ). Female: petiole sometimes distinctly crenulate similar to propodeal plical region( Figs. 37 View FIGURES 31–38 , 47 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ) ...................................................................................... elegans View in CoL speciesgroup... 6
– Both sexes: propodeum with paraspiracular region bare, except sometimes for line of setae along anterior margin ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ). Female: petiole sometimes with median ridge, but otherwise much smoother than crenulate plical region of propodeum ( Figs. 33, 35 View FIGURES 31–38 , 45 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 )..................................................................................................... 9
6(5) Mesoscutum partly grossly umbilicate but parapsidal and notaular bands with distinctly smaller punctures and forming like pattern, at least in female ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9–18 ); face with punctures on parascrobal region brightly colored in contrast to dark or coppery interstices (cf. Fig. 2); petiole not longitudinally crenulate ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ) ...................................................................................................... B. elegans (Masi) View in CoL
– Mesoscutum comparatively uniformly reticulate and parapsidal bands separate from notaular band ( Figs. 13, 15 View FIGURES 9–18 ) and/or extending posteriorly to scutellum at inner angle of axilla if separate for only about twothirds length of mesoscutum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9–18 ); face with punctures and interstices the same color (Fig. 1); petiole variably conspicuously longitudinally crenulate ( Figs. 37 View FIGURES 31–38 , 47 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ).............................. 7
7(6) Female only known: mesoscutum dorsally with comparatively indistinct dark bands, the parapsidal bands extending only about half length of mesoscutum and not joining notaular band, and notaular band extending only very narrowly to scutellum ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9–18 ); lower face reticulatepunctate or rugulose towards oral margin; scrobal channel punctulatereticulate; scutellum reticulate (cf. Fig. 38 View FIGURES 31–38 )..... ....................................................................................................... B. dictyota View in CoL n. sp.
– Both sexes: mesoscutum dorsally with distinct black bands, the parapsidal bands extending posteriorly to scutellum and notaular band posteriorly occupying width of scutellum ( Figs. 13, 14 View FIGURES 9–18 ); lower face with distinct subcircular punctures, even near oral margin (Figs. 1, 20); scrobal channel at most finely coriaceous excluding setiferous pores; scutellum with tiny setiferous punctures overlying coriaceous subsculpture ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 31–38 ) ............................................................................................. 8
8(7) Both sexes: mesoscutum with lateral margins of notaular band uniformly concave and parapsidal bands separate from notaular band virtually to posterior margin ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–18 ); propodeal callus with lateral, vertical surface smooth and shiny except for setal pores, the sculpture obviously different from that of metapleuron (cf. Fig. 53 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ); scutellum greenish medially and bluish laterally ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–18 ). Female: gaster in dorsal view uniformly dark brown ............................................ B. eximia (Masi)
– Female only known: mesoscutum with lateral margins of notaular band abruptly recurved in about posterior quarter to third and merged with parapsidal bands to form subparallel, longitudinal sides for short distance anterior to scutellum ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9–18 ); propodeal callus with lateral, vertical surface extensively micropunctate over coriaceous subsculpture, the sculpture adjacent to metapleuron similar to metapleuron ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ); scutellum usually with conspicuous median coppery band ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9–18 ); gaster in dorsal view with penultimate tergum bright greenish to partly blue, contrasting distinctly with other dark brown terga .......... B. eximiassita View in CoL n. sp.
9(5) Dorsellum with posterior surface variably setose ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 )...................................... ................................................................................ cylindrica View in CoL speciesgroup... 10
– Dorsellum with posterior surface bare ( Figs. 43–47 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ) or at most with single seta projecting paralaterally from carinate dorsal margin ... laciniosa View in CoL speciesgroup ...12
10(9) Upper parascrobal region with low convex, longitudinal bare region of slightly transverse, reticulatepunctulate sculpture between lines of setae along scrobal depression and inner orbit (Figs. 29, 30); acropleuron with postalar region extensively and conspicuously sculptured, reticulatepunctate ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ) ................. ................................................................................................. B. cylindrica Walker View in CoL
– Upper parascrobal region with flat to slightly concave dorsal region of coriaceous to reticulaterugulose sculpture and entirely setiferous (Fig. 21); acropleuron with postalar region often only finely coriaceousaciculate ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ) .......................... 11
11(10) Female only known: metanotal panel with precrenular region entirely setose ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ); syntergum conspicuously elongate, at least 10 x as long as wide and subequal in length to combined length of head and mesosoma ..................... B. reburra View in CoL n. sp. – Both sexes: metanotal panel with single line of setae near anterior margin of precrenular region ( Figs. 45 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 , 48, 50 View FIGURES 47–54. 47 ); syntergum obviously shorter than above, shorter than length of mesosoma ....................................... B. indica (Mani & Kaul) View in CoL
12(9) Female................................................................................................................... 13
– Male ...................................................................................................................... 17
13(12) Syntergum short and stubby, and with dorsal surface smooth, shiny and bare posterior to short basal setose band ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55–59. 55 ) ................................. B. enoptra View in CoL n. sp.
– Syntergum variably elongate and narrow but at least uniformly sculptured and setose .............................................................................................................................. 14
14(13) Gaster with conspicuously elongateslender syntergum recurved dorsally relative to rest of gaster ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 55–59. 55 ), the syntergum subdivided submedially by lateral notch differentiating basal portion surrounding ovipositor sheaths from slender apical portion lying above ovipositor sheaths ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 55–59. 55 ) .................. B. camptogastra View in CoL n. sp.
– Gaster with dorsal surface at most slightly concave in lateral view, the syntergum variable in length but consisting of undifferentiated tergum surrounding all but apex of ovipositor sheaths .................................................................................... 15
15(14) Mesoscutum with brownish, unmodified, hairlike setae; mesonotum with shaped dark region extending posteriorly as broad median band that usually also extends, more or less distinctly, over about anterior half of scutellum medially ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 9–18 ); forewing with mediocubital fold brownish beyond basal cell.................. ............................................................................................... B. splendida (Girault) View in CoL
– Mesoscutum with white, flattened, lanceolate setae dorsally, at least laterally anterior to level of tegula ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–18 ); mesonotum with color pattern variable, but at least medial dark band not continued posteriorly as similar band onto scutellum ( Figs. 9, 16 View FIGURES 9–18 ); forewing hyaline ............................................................................. 16
16(15) Mesoscutum with white lanceolate setae only laterally in region anterior to level of tegula and with parapsidal and notaular bands forming 3 separate bands ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 9–18 ); scutellum reticulate ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 31–38 ) ......................... B. reticulata View in CoL (Nikol’skaya)
– Mesoscutum with white lanceolate setae within notaular band and with parapsidal and notaular bands forming like pattern ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–18 ); scutellum with sculpture aligned into longitudinal rugae at least anteriorly ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31–38 ) ........ B. laciniosa View in CoL n. sp.
17(12) Mesoscutum with brownish, unmodified, hairlike setae; scutellum variably coriaceousreticulate to completely reticulate ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 39–46. 39–42 ) ........ B. splendida (Girault) View in CoL
– Mesoscutum with white lanceolate setae within notaular band and laterally in region anterior to tegula; scutellum with sculpture aligned into longitudinal rugae at least anteriorly ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 31–38 ) ........................................................... B. laciniosa View in CoL n. sp.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.