Cantha eteocla (Plötz, 1882)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5271.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:39D641B7-1800-4918-8E88-4EC5FF4BB56C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7864346 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F84A87F4-9B27-FFD2-FF3C-A304B890F855 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cantha eteocla (Plötz, 1882) |
status |
|
Cantha eteocla (Plötz, 1882) and Cantha buriti (O. Mielke, 1968) , new combinations
Hesperia eteocla Pl View in CoL ̂tz, 1882 (type locality in Brazil: Rio de Janeiro) and Phlebodes buriti O. Mielke, 1968 View in CoL (type locality in Brazil: Mato Grosso) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 dark green), including their primary type specimens, cluster among Cantha Evans, 1955 View in CoL (type species Cantha calva Evans, 1955 View in CoL ) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 purple) in the nuclear genomic tree and are not monophyletic with Papilio pertinax Stoll, [1781] (type locality in Suriname), the type species of Phlebodes Hübner, [1819] View in CoL , the genus of their current placement. Therefore, we propose Cantha eteocla (Pl̂tz, 1882), comb. nov. and Cantha buriti (O. Mielke, 1968) , comb. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cantha eteocla (Plötz, 1882)
Zhang, Jing, Dolibaina, Diego R., Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Song, Leina, Mielke, Carlos G. C., Casagrande, Mirna M., Mielke, Olaf H. H. & Grishin, Nick V. 2023 |
Cantha buriti (O. Mielke, 1968)
Zhang & Dolibaina & Cong & Shen & Song & Mielke & Casagrande & Mielke & Grishin 2023 |
Phlebodes buriti
O. Mielke 1968 |
Cantha
Evans 1955 |
Cantha calva
Evans 1955 |
Phlebodes Hübner, [1819]
Hubner 1819 |
Papilio pertinax
Stoll 1781 |