Hylaeus (Prosopis) confusus Nylander 1852
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.208438 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4489682 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F80B87DA-5977-FFDD-FF51-FAE7FECBFDD4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hylaeus (Prosopis) confusus Nylander 1852 |
status |
|
Hylaeus (Prosopis) confusus Nylander 1852 View in CoL
( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 d, 11a–b)
Hylaeus confusus Nylander 1852b: 232 View in CoL , Ƥ, 3 (type locality: Europe); Davydova 2002: 94; Davydova & Pesenko 2002: 583; Proshchalykin 2003a: 26; 2004: 3; 2005: 30; 2007a: 883; 2007b: 89; 2008: 6; 2009: 6; 2010: 509; Proshchalykin et al. 2004: 158; Ignatenko & Proshchalykin 2005: 244; Eremeeva et al. 2006: 26; 2009: 118; Konusova et al. 2007: 213; Quest 2009: 126; Proshchalykin & Quest 2009: 239.
Prosopis sublaevis Schenck 1853: 215 , Ƥ (neotype—Ƥ, designated by Straka & Bogusch 2011: 53, “Klánovický les –V, Praha- Klánovice” [ Czech Republic] [Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main]).
Hylaeus xanthocnemis Förster 1871: 969 , Ƥ (neotype—Ƥ, designated by Straka & Bogusch 2011: 53, “Klánovický les, Praha- Klánovice” [ Czech Republic] [Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main]).
Hylaeus nigriceps Förster 1871: 977 , Ƥ (holotype—Ƥ, Aachen, Germany).
Hylaeus similatus Förster 1871: 994 –995, 3 (type locality: Piesting, Austria).
Prosopis pallididens Dalla Torre 1896: 28 , nom. nov. pro H. pallidens Curtis 1831 .
Hylaeus monticola Bridwell 1919: 155 View in CoL , Ƥ, 3 (type locality: Chuzenji, Tochigi Prefecture, Honshu, Japan); Kuwayama 1967: 208; Proshchalykin 2003b: 5; 2004: 3; 2007a: 883; Chen et al. 2010: 119. Syn. nov.
Hylaeus wilmattae Cockerell 1924a: 280 –281, Ƥ, 3 (holotype—3, “Kudia River, Siberia” [Primorskiy Terr., Russia], VI.1923, leg. W. Cockerell). Synonymized by Warncke 1981: 157.
Prosopis confusa: Osytshnjuk & Romankova 1995: 487 .
Hylaeus confusa: Konusova & Yanyushkin 2000: 284 .
Material examined: 78 Ƥ, 98 3. Russia. Altai Republic (Talda, 20 km NNW Aktash); Khakasia Republic (Shira Lake); Irkutsk Prov. (Bratsk, Sosnovyi I.); Zabaikalskiy Terr. (12 km N Darasun, Tura River); Yakutia (Amga, Michailovka, Khaptagai, Zhemkon, 75 km SE Yakutsk, Pilka River, Olekminsk); Amurskaya Prov. (Kundur, 20 km SW Fevralsk, Talakan); Primorskiy Terr. (Lazovskiy Nature Reserve, Anisimovka, Spassk, Kievka, Andreevka, Novokachalinsk, Blagodatnoe, Novovladimirovka, Lozovoi, Rudnaya Pristan, Preobrazhenie, Evseevka, Khorol); Khabarovsk Terr. (Pivan, Sulak, Bychikha, Komsomolsk on Amur); Sakhalin (Kholmsk, 10 km E Boshnyakovo, Tymovsk); Kuril Islands (Kunashir: Tret'yakovo, Stolbchatyi, Alekhino, Dubovoe, Lagunnoe Lake, Goryachee Lake, Sernovodsk, Yuzhno-Kurilsk).
Distribution in Russia. European part ( Osytshnjuk et al. 1978), Tomsk. Prov., Kemerovo Prov., Khakasia Republic ( Konusova & Yanyushkin 2000; Konusova et al. 2007), *Altai Republic, Zabaikalskiy Terr., Yakutia, Amurskaya Prov., Primorskiy Terr., Khabarovsk Terr., Sakhalin, Kuril Islands (Kunashir) ( Kuwayama 1967).
General distribution. Transpalaearctic up to Kuril Islands; Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Tsushima) ( Ikudome 1989); China (Jilin, Xizang); all over Europe to 66° north, south to Greece; China (Xizang), Asia Minor, Caucasus.
Remarks. Until now Hylaeus confusus Nylander 1852 has been considered to be very common in the Russian Far East, but absent on the Japanese islands; in Japan, until now, only a similar species, H. monticola Bridwell 1919 , was recorded. We have now compared the taxa in question, using material from Russia and Japan that includes the type of H. monticola (3, type no 50734, NMNH Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution). It was also necessary to consider new insights on the taxonomy of the Hylaeus gibbus species-group provided by Straka & Bogusch (2011). The result is clear: the Japanese specimens belong to the common and widespread H. confusus Nylander.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hylaeus (Prosopis) confusus Nylander 1852
Yu, Maxim & Dathe, Holger H. 2012 |
Hylaeus confusa:
Konusova 2000: 284 |
Prosopis confusa:
Osytshnjuk 1995: 487 |
Hylaeus wilmattae
Warncke 1981: 157 |
Cockerell 1924: 280 |
Hylaeus monticola
Chen 2010: 119 |
Proshchalykin 2003: 5 |
Kuwayama 1967: 208 |
Bridwell 1919: 155 |
Prosopis pallididens
Dalla 1896: 28 |
Hylaeus xanthocnemis Förster 1871 : 969
Straka 2011: 53 |
Forster 1871: 969 |
Hylaeus nigriceps Förster 1871 : 977
Forster 1871: 977 |
Hylaeus similatus Förster 1871 : 994
Forster 1871: 994 |
Prosopis sublaevis
Straka 2011: 53 |
Schenck 1853: 215 |
Hylaeus confusus
Quest 2009: 126 |
Quest 2009: 239 |
Konusova 2007: 213 |
Eremeeva 2006: 26 |
Ignatenko 2005: 244 |
Proshchalykin 2003: 26 |
Nylander 1852: 232 |