Euochin nanjiabawa, Wang & Zhang, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5E47BD6-8995-40CC-9C0F-CA7462A62DF2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8006864 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F70C8787-FF9C-E06E-FF5C-FACBFD90FD6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euochin nanjiabawa |
status |
sp. nov. |
Euochin nanjiabawa View in CoL sp. nov. (南ůƙẅss)
Figs 104–120 View FIGURES 104–108 View FIGURES 117–120
Type material. Holotype: ♁ (MHBU-ARA-00025235), CHINA: Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Bayi District , Bayi Town (WBhäLJIJĭffifflflLJŔ͠DZ), 2022.6.4, 29.736903°N, 94.124103°E, 3076 m a.s.l., 4 June 2022, leg. B. Liu. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 2♀ (MHBU-ARA-00025236), same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species is named after Mt. Nanjiabawa (also known as Mt. Namcha Barwa); the type locality is at the foot of this mountain. Noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males closely resemble Euochin subwanyan in the palpal morphology, but can be distinguished by the embolic flange stretching notably higher along the embolus (vs. obviously lower in E. subwanyan ; cf. Figs 109–112 and Wang & Li, 2020, fig. 5B). Females can be easily distinguished by the anteriorly located epigynal window (Figs 115–116, 119–120; vs. more posteriorly located and partly overlapped with the spermatheca in ventral view, as in E. subwanyan , see Wang & Li, 2020, figs 6A–B). The female epigyne also resembles that of E. lingyi sp. nov. and E. tianhe sp. nov., but the three species can be distinguished by: (1) the shapes of the epigynal windows (wider than long in E. nanjiabawa sp. nov. and E. tianhe sp. nov., while longer than wide in E. lingyi sp. nov.); (2) the distances between the copulatory openings (close to each other in E. lingyi sp. nov. and E. tianhe sp. nov., while far away in E. nanjiabawa sp. nov.); (3) the trajectories of the copulatory ducts (running antero-laterally from the spermatheca in E. nanjiabawa sp. nov. and E. tianhe sp. nov., while running posteriorly in E. lingyi sp. nov.); (4) the sizes of the fertilization ducts (much larger in E. nanjiabawa sp. nov. and E. tianhe sp. nov., while smaller in E. lingyi sp. nov.) (cf. Figs 83–84 View FIGURES 80–84 , 87–88 View FIGURES 85–88 , 115–116, 119–120, 164–165, 168–169).
Description. Male. Habitus see Figs 104,106 View FIGURES 104–108 .Carapace length 2.095; abdomen length 1.721. Eye measurements:
AME 0.376, ALE 0.235, PME 0.065, PLE 0.220. Leg measurements: I 3.803 (1.224, 0.587, 0.920, 0.599, 0.473), II 3.285 (1.067, 0.485, 0.788, 0.546, 0.399), III 3.547 (1.190, 0.512, 0.712, 0.722, 0.411), IV 4.027 (1.253, 0.510, 0.877, 0.926, 0.461); leg formula: 4132. Color in ethanol: carapace dark brown, covered with yellowish setae. Abdomen dark, with yellow and brown bands. Chelicera ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 104–108 ) with two promarginal and one retromarginal teeth. Palp (Figs 109–112, 117–118): distal femur and patella with long white setae; embolic disc obvious but relatively small, partly hidden by tegulum in ventral view; embolus tapered, with blunt embolic flange ventrally; cymbial flange notably extended; RTA tapered, with small laminate process dorsally.
Female. Habitus see Figs 105, 107 View FIGURES 104–108 . Carapace length 1.794; abdomen length 2.496. Eye measurements: AME 0.393, ALE 0.232, PME 0.083, PLE 0.228. Leg measurements: I 2.825 (0.967, 0.345, 0.711, 0.435, 0.367), II 2.622 (0.908, 0.375, 0.591, 0.398, 0.350), III 2.995 (0.982, 0.361, 0.636, 0.616, 0.400), IV 3.722 (1.232, 0.427, 0.771, 0.822, 0.520); leg formula: 4312. Color in ethanol: like that of male. Chelicera as in male. Epigyne (Figs 114–116, 119–120): epigynal window wider than long, with narrow median septum; copulatory opening located at posterior margin of epigynal window; copulatory duct running antero-laterally to copulatory opening, with obvious accessory gland; spermatheca ovoid, with top joining large fertilization duct.
Distribution. China (Xizang).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |