Agapostemon (Agapostemon) sericeus (Forster)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1130.86413 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C8FFC906-D96F-43AC-A5B9-FB21B6E27C33 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F638DA21-69D3-5C5F-B8A3-860D7F7E3F27 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Agapostemon (Agapostemon) sericeus (Forster) |
status |
|
Agapostemon (Agapostemon) sericeus (Forster)
Diagnosis.
The female of Agapostemon sericeus can be recognized by the combination of the metallic green metasoma (as in Fig. 4C View Figure 4 ) and the reticulate sculpturing of the scutum (Figs 5B View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 ). It is most similar to Agapostemon splendens , but Agapostemon splendens has the scutum more punctured (Fig. 6B View Figure 6 ) rather than reticulate, and Agapostemon sericeus can be further distinguished by its sharply angled dorsolateral ridge of the pronotum (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ) and by having the ventral pleural tubercle flush with the plate (Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ).
Male Agapostemon sericeus have S3 and S4 with a low transverse swelling and generally have distinct yellow marks on the apical sterna (Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ). They are most similar to males of Agapostemon texanus but can be distinguished by the relative lengths of F1 and F2: in Agapostemon sericeus F1 is slightly more than half the length of F2, whereas in Agapostemon texanus F1 is about three-fourths the length of F2 (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ). They can also be separated by the genitalia (see Roberts 1972).
Remarks.
Agapostemon sericeus was previously known as Agapostemon radiatus (Say) (e.g., Mitchell 1960; Roberts 1972) but was synonymized by Day and Fitton (1977).
Females of Agapostemon femoratus Crawford, primarily a western species not recorded east of New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming by Roberts (1972), are essentially identical to females of Agapostemon sericeus , though the males are quite distinct, possessing a grossly enlarged hind femur, its width and length equal or nearly so. The key in Roberts (1972) indicates the scutum of female Agapostemon sericeus is more distinctly punctate than Agapostemon femoratus , but we do not consider this a reliable separating character. Curiously, there are several Missouri records of Agapostemon femoratus from the 1960s identified by Roberts in separate online databases, (discoverlife.org, Ascher and Pickering 2022), but these were not included in his 1972 revision. We have not seen these specimens, but assume they represent mis-determined females of Agapostemon sericeus , not Agapostemon femoratus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |