Vectoriella gabesensis, Kim & Sikorski & O’Reilly & Boxshall, 2013

Kim, Il-Hoi, Sikorski, Andrey, O’Reilly, Myles & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2013, Copepods associated with polychaete worms in European seas, Zootaxa 3651 (1), pp. 1-62 : 52-54

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3651.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E9DC61F-00B8-42CF-BBB0-41651072F38C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5266650

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F473E52C-1C75-BB43-059F-FF1A2162E818

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Vectoriella gabesensis
status

sp. nov.

Vectoriella gabesensis n. sp.

Type material: Holotype ♀ (intact) from Aricidea catherinae ; Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia (~ 33 o 50.26’N, 10 o 36.38’E), depth 13 m, found by David Hall, 28 October 2004; BMNH Reg. No. 2012.1406. GoogleMaps

2 ♂♂ (allotype ♂ intact and 1 ♂ dissected paratype) from A. catherinae ; Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia, (~ 33 o 50.26’N, 10 o 36.38’E), depth 13 m, found by David Hall, 28 October 2004; BMNH Reg. No. 2012.1407 (intact), BMNH Reg. No. 2012.1411 (dissected).. GoogleMaps

4 paratype ♀ (1 ♀ dissected; 3 ♀ partly damaged) from A. catherinae ; Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia, (~ 33 o 50.26’N, 10 o 36.38’E), depth 13 m, found by David Hall, October 2004; BMNH Reg. No. 2012.1408-1410 (undissected), BMNH Reg. No. 2012.1412 (dissected) GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The specific name is derived from the type locality, the Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia, in the Mediterranean Sea.

Female. Body ( Fig. 29A View FIGURE 29 ) consisting of weakly defined cephalosome, large inflated trunk, and 2-segmented urosome. Body length 508 µm, excluding caudal setae. Cephalosome defined from trunk only by slight lateral constriction. Trunk flattened, about 435×275 µm, slightly broadening posteriorly, with weakly concave lateral margins near middle of trunk. Urosome ( Fig. 29B View FIGURE 29 ) consisting of genital complex and 1-segmented abdomen. Genital complex much wider than long; genital apertures large and located ventrally ( Fig. 29B View FIGURE 29 ). Abdomen about 1.5 times as long as wide. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 29C View FIGURE 29 ) weakly tapering, 39×14 µm (ratio 2.79:1), with 5 naked setae.

Rostrum absent. Antennule ( Fig. 29D View FIGURE 29 ) 5-segmented, with armature formula 2, 7, 2, 1+aesthetasc, and 4; all of setae simple and naked. Antenna ( Fig. 29E View FIGURE 29 ) rudimentary, lobate with 2 setae (one small and process-like), and 1 distally bifurcate spine.

Labrum ( Fig. 29F View FIGURE 29 ) with tapering lateral margins and 2 nipple-shaped processes near concave posteromedial margin. Mandible ( Fig. 29G View FIGURE 29 ) with 1 large, plate-like distal element covered by spinules. Paragnath ( Fig. 29H View FIGURE 29 ) as spinulose lobe. Maxillule ( Fig. 29I View FIGURE 29 ) lobate, with 5 thick setae distally. Maxilla ( Fig. 29J View FIGURE 29 ) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment with 3 blunt spinulose spines. Maxilliped ( Fig. 29K View FIGURE 29 ) 3-segmented; first segment unarmed; second segment with 1 medial seta; third segment unarmed, gradually narrowed distally, with truncate tip covered by spinules.

Leg 1 represented by pair of blunt setae anteriorly on ventral surface of trunk ( Fig. 29A View FIGURE 29 ). Legs 2 and 3 each represented by 1 blunt seta ( Fig. 29A View FIGURE 29 ). Legs 4 and 5 absent. Leg 6 represented by 2 small setae in genital area ( Fig. 29B View FIGURE 29 ).

Male. Body ( Fig. 29L View FIGURE 29 ) evenly tapering from anterior to posterior and consisting of 7 incompletely articulated somites. Body length 385 µm excluding caudal setae. Maximum width 111 µm. First tagma (cephalothorax) incorporating cephalosome and first and second pedigerous somites. Cephalosomic area of cephalothorax expanded, forming widest part of body. Free abdomen 2-segmented. Anal somite distinctly longer than preceding free abdominal somite. Caudal ramus 58×13 µm (ratio 4.46:1), with 5 setae; medial terminal seta longest, 161 µm long.

Rostrum absent as in female. Antennule segmented as in female but with different armature formula: 2, 7, 3+aesthetasc, 1+aesthetasc, and 4+aesthetasc. Antenna as in female. Labrum ( Fig. 29M View FIGURE 29 ) sexually dimorphic, directed anteriorly and extending beyond frontal margin of cephalothorax ( Fig. 29L View FIGURE 29 ), bearing pair of flat, wedgelike elements. Other mouthparts, including maxilliped, as in female.

Leg 1 bilobed: larger outer lobe with 2 setae, smaller inner lobe (endopod) unarmed ( Fig. 29L View FIGURE 29 ). Legs 2 and 3 with 1 seta on outer lobe and unarmed inner lobe, Legs 4 and 5 absent. Leg 6 each represented by 2 setae on posterior corner of genital flaps closing off paired genital apertures ( Fig. 29L View FIGURE 29 ).

Remarks. Two species are currently known in the genus Vectoriella : both are associates of polychaetes of the family Paraonidae : V. marinovi Stock, 1968 associated with Aricidea (Acmira) cerrutii Laubier, 1966 (as Aricidea jeffreysii (McIntosh)) from the Black Sea ( Stock, 1968) and V. ramosae Laubier and Carton, 1973 associated with Aedicira mediterranea Laubier and Ramos, 1974 (as Aricidea (Aedicira) mediterranea ) from the Mediterranean Sea ( Laubier and Carton, 1973). Several of the females had remnants of ovisacs and were attached dorsally on their hosts around setiger 14 or 15. The head of the copepod was directed towards the anterior of the worm.

Vectoriella gabesensis n. sp. is more similar to V. marinovi than to V. ramosae in having a female abdomen that is longer than wide, five caudal setae in the female, three spiniform elements on the distal segment of the maxilla, and the anteriorly projecting male labrum bearing a pair of wedge-like elements. It is notable that Stock (1968) misinterpreted the male labrum as the rostrum, presumably because it forms a rostrum-like anterior protrusion which extends beyond the anterior margin of cephalothorax. It originates from the region posterior to the antenna.

The new species is distinguishable from V. marinovi by the following character states: 1) the caudal ramus of V. gabesensis n. sp. is 2.79 times longer than wide in the female and 4.46 times as long as wide in the male, compared to 4.5 times in the female and 6 times in the male of V. marinovi ( Stock, 1968) ; 2) the antenna of V. gabesensis n. sp. bears 2 setae and 1 spine, unlike that of V. marinovi which bears 2 setae only; 3) the terminal (third) segment of the maxilliped, which exhibits no sexual dimorphism, bears only a spinulose pad distally in V. gabesensis n. sp., unlike that of V. marinovi which bears two pectinate elements; 4) legs 1–3 of V. gabesensis n. sp. are represented by 1 or 2 setae in the female but those of V.marinovi are biramous, although the rami are feebly developed.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF