Vivgottoia garwoodi, Kim & Sikorski & O’Reilly & Boxshall, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3651.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E9DC61F-00B8-42CF-BBB0-41651072F38C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5266634 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F473E52C-1C6C-BB5D-059F-FBD220D2EB88 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Vivgottoia garwoodi |
status |
n. gen. et n. sp. |
Vivgottoia garwoodi n. gen. et n. sp.
Type material: Holotype ♀ ovigerous (dissected and mounted on a glass slide) from inside tail fragment of terebellid polychaete (probably Phisidia aurea ); Glen Arm , Antrim, Northern Ireland, Stn GL 5C (54 o 58.20’N, 05 o 55.32’W), depth 32 m, collected by P. Garwood; BMNH Reg. No. 2012.1394. GoogleMaps
Female. Body ( Fig. 23A View FIGURE 23 ) vermiform, elongate, cylindrical, and composed of well-marked cephalosome, first to fifth pedigerous somites, genital complex and 1-segmented abdomen. Body length 2.04 mm. Cephalosome smaller than pedigerous somites, 141×166 µm, nearly circular, with slightly produced but truncate frontal margin. First to fifth pedigerous somites distinctly defined from one another by lateral constrictions, 166×178, 295×233, 350×233, 430×255, and 313×231 µm, respectively. Genital complex 81×179 µm; paired genital apertures large and each positioned dorsolaterally on enlarged genital prominence ( Fig. 23B View FIGURE 23 ). Abdomen 1-segmented, dorsally confluent with but ventrally well defined from genital complex, about 246×91 µm. Caudal ramus tapering, fused to abdomen at base, about 144×44 µm, with 2 lateral and 2 small distal setae.
Rostrum ( Fig. 23C View FIGURE 23 ) shield-like, directed posteroventrally, longer than wide and truncate at apex, ornamented with 2 pairs of setules on anterior surface. Antennule ( Fig. 23D View FIGURE 23 ) stout and 5-segmented; first segment longest; armature formula 1, 2, 1, 1, and 1; distal 2 segments with minute spinules along anterior margin. Antenna ( Fig. 23E View FIGURE 23 ) 2-segmented; proximal segment 2.5 times as long as wide, unarmed but with patch of spinules distally; distal segment twice as long as wide, inserted on outer margin of proximal segment, armed with 3 apical setae, one distinctly larger than other 2.
Labrum ( Fig. 23G View FIGURE 23 ) unornamented, with strongly tapering posterior margin. Mandible ( Fig. 23H View FIGURE 23 ) terminating in single blade, articulated at base. Maxillule ( Fig. 23I View FIGURE 23 ) lobate, armed with 2 outer and 2 medial setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 23J View FIGURE 23 ) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment forming strong claw bearing subdistal patch of spinules on convex margin. Maxilliped ( Fig. 23K View FIGURE 23 ) 3-segmented; first segment expanded but unarmed; second segment small and unarmed; terminal segment forming strong, smooth claw.
Legs 1–4 ( Fig. 24A–D View FIGURE 24 ) positioned ventrolaterally, all identical in form, biramous, composed of undivided protopod and single-segmented rami; intercoxal sclerites lacking; each protopod with 1 outer seta but lacking inner seta; both rami of legs indistinctly defined from protopod. Exopod of all legs with longitudinal sclerotization along outer margin and bearing either 1 (in legs 1, 3 and 4) or 2 (in leg 2) simple setae. Endopod of all legs expanded, foliaceous and unarmed, with constriction on outer margin and sclerotization along outer margin of distal part.
Leg 5 ( Fig. 24E View FIGURE 24 ) rudimentary, represented by 2 simple setae. Leg 6 absent.
Male. Unknown.
Etymology. The specific name honours Dr Peter R. Garwood (Identichaet, Newcastle-upon-Tyne) in recognition of his contributions over many years collecting copepods associated with invertebrates.
Remarks. This is the first clausiid to be reported from a terebellid host, although terebellids are common hosts of symbiotic copepods from other families such as the Saccopsidae and Xenocoelomatidae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |