Hirudo troctina, Moquin-Tandon, 1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930110048945 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F4233706-8841-D522-FF40-5FEF7550FA79 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hirudo troctina |
status |
|
Diagnosis of Hirudo troctina
Based on our observations H. troctina can be diagnosed formally as follows (see Sawyer, 1986: 13, 684): Hirudinidae (monostichodont; no pharyngeal ridges terminating between jaws); Hirudininae (male paired ducts of ‘hirudoid’ type: i.e. epididymis and ejaculatory bulb present and looped, not forming linear series [see Richardson, 1969]); vagina with small distinct caecum; no vaginal duct; vagina bulbous, upright and not folded; ejaculatory bulbs relatively small in relation to massive epididymes; characteristic pigmentation: one annulus of each segment with four (or six) black spots (not longitudinally striped).
Hirudo troctina can be distinguished from its congener H. medicinalis as follows:
1 Dorsum with four (or six) metameric black dots.. Hirudo troctina Johnson, 1816 Vagina bulbous, upright and not folded; epididymis massive in relation to ejaculatory bulb.
– Dorsum essentially longitudinally striped, lacking metameric black dots.................... Hirudo medicinalis Linnaeus, 1758 Vagina a folded, elongated tube in non-juveniles; epididymis not much larger than ejaculatory bulb.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |