Gymnesigobius, Kovačić & Ordines & Ramirez-Amaro & Schliewen, 2019

Kovačić, Marcelo, Ordines, Francesc, Ramirez-Amaro, Sergio & Schliewen, Ulrich K., 2019, Gymnesigobius medits (Teleostei: Gobiidae), a new gobiid genus and species from the western Mediterranean slope bottoms, Zootaxa 4651 (3), pp. 513-530 : 515-519

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4651.3.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F58CBEE-A382-4E48-9363-569FC7437587

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F36C87BE-FF99-445C-FF6F-FB38DCD609F2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Gymnesigobius
status

gen. nov.

Gymnesigobius gen. nov.

Diagnosis. (1) chin without fold or barbels; (2) mouth terminal, oblique, with anterior tip above horizontal level of lower eye edge; (3) predorsal area and first dorsal fin base naked; (4) pelvic fin anterior membrane (frenum) well developed; (5) head with anterior oculoscapular ( AOC) and preopercular (PC) canals, with pores σ, λ, κ, ω, α, β, ρ and γ, δ, ε respectively, posterior oculoscapular canal ( POC) absent; (6) pores of head canals enlarged e.g. pores α and ρ larger or about same size as interspaces to pore β; (7) six transverse suborbital rows of sensory papillae, four continuous suborbital rows in front of row b, fifth divided in three parts but in front of row b, sixth just as superior part above row b and below pore α; (8) longitudinal suborbital row b barely reaching forward to the vertical from posterior edge of eye.

This short diagnosis is the combination of the selected cardinal characters that distinguish this new genus from twenty genera presently assigned to the “ Gobius -lineage” sensu Agorreta et al. (2013) (see Genetics and phylogeny results). The combination of eight characters provides differences of three to seven selected characters for each genus (only the characters which are not variable among species in the compared genus and therefore are different between the new genus and all species of the compared genus were counted as different) of the “ Gobius -lineage” sensu Agorreta et al. (2013) ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ). Sufflogobius Smith 1956 , for which published morphological data are scarce, also has three different characters (1–3) versus the new genus in this diagnosis, while the state of characters (4–8) is unknown for this genus. Character (1) distinguishes the new genus from Sufflogobius and Benthophilus Eichwald 1831 . Character (2) distinguishes the new genus from all genera except Benthophilus in part, Chromogobius de Buen 1930 in part and Vanneaugobius Brownell 1978 in part, character (3) distinguishes the new genus from all genera except Benthophilus , Corcyrogobius Miller 1972 in part, Coryogalops Smith 1958 in part and Thorogobius Miller 1969 in part. Character (4) is diagnostic only with regard to closely related Odondebuenia de Buen 1930 , Vanneaugobius and Wheelerigobius Miller 1981 . The combination of head canals of character (5) distinguishes the new genus from all genera except Chromogobius , Didogobius Miller 1966 in part, Millerigobius Bath 1973 , Odondebuenia , Vanneaugobius in part. Character (6) distinguishes the new genus from all genera except Thorogobius in part, i.e. one species, T. rofeni Miller 1988 also has large head canal pores. Character (7) distinguishes the new genus from all genera except Coryogalops and Didogobius in part, character (8) distinguishes the new genus from all genera except Benthophilus , Chromogobius in part, Coryogalops in part, Didogobius in part, Millerigobius , Vanneaugobius in part.

Description. Body elongate, laterally more compressed towards caudal peduncle. Head of moderate size and depressed. Snout gently oblique, shorter than eye. Anterior nostril long, tubular, without process from rim; posterior nostril short tube. Eyes large, dorsolateral, distinctly elevated above dorsal profile with narrow interorbital space. Mouth terminal, oblique, with anterior tip above horizontal level of lower eye edge. Chin without fold or barbels. Branchiostegal membrane attached along entire lateral margin of isthmus from immediately anterior to pectoral margin. Cranial roof covered by dorsal axial musculature. No spines on preopercle. Pectoral girdle without dermal flaps on anterior edge. Tongue well-developed. Two dorsal fins, first fin with VI spines, not elongated or filamentous, second dorsal- and anal-fin counts moderate (I/11; I/10 respectively in this species). Pectoral-fin ray count moderately low (17 in this species). Pectoral girdle without flaps on anterior edge. Uppermost rays of pectoral fin not free from membrane. Pelvic fins I,5 + 5,I, left and right fin well connected, anterior pelvic membrane (frenum) well-developed and without lateral lobes. Caudal fin rounded, shorter than head length, with 17 segmented and 14 branched rays. Body scaled. Head with cheek and opercle naked. Predorsal area, first dorsal-fin base and prepectoral naked, breast and belly scaled. Low count of scales in lateral series (28 in this species). No intense colors or complex coloration pattern on body (body with gentle yellow orange pattern in this species). Head with anterior oculoscapular and preopercular canals, posterior oculoscapular canal absent. Pores of head canals enlarged e.g. pores α and ρ larger or about same size as interspaces to pore β. Snout with three median preorbital series and lateral series in four parts. Suborbital rows of sensory papillae with row a absent, longitudinal row b barely reaching forward to the vertical from posterior edge of eye and row d well-developed. Six transverse suborbital rows of sensory papillae, four continuous suborbital rows in front of row b, fifth divided in three parts but in front of row b, sixth just as superior part above row b and below pore α. Anterior dorsal transverse row o distant at the dorsal midline from the equivalent row of the other lateral side. Longitudinal row g not reaching anteriorly to transverse row o. Interorbital papillae absent. Vertebral column with 10 precaudal and 18 caudal vertebrae (including urostyl). Pterygiophore fin formula: 3-22110. Two anal-fin pterygiophores before haemal spine of the 1 st caudal vertebra.

TABLE 2. Comparison of the eight diagnostic characters of Gymnesigobius medits sp. nov. with other genera of the “Gobius-lineage” sensu Agorreta et al. (2013)

Character in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7a 7b 8
diagnosis
Character Head barbels Mouth Predorsal area V anterior Head canals Pore size Total number Number of Longitudinal
    anterior tip and D1 base membrane and pores   of suborbital continuous suborbital row b
      squamation       transversal suborbital  
              rows transversal rows  
                anteriorly + divided  
                rows posteriorly  
                above/below level  
                of row b  
Gymnesigobius head without above level predorsal area present AOC: σ, λ, κ, large e.g. pores α, β, ρ 6 4+2/1 barely reaching
medits sp. nov. barbels of lower and D1 base   ω, α, β, ρ; POC larger or about same size     forward to the
    eye edge naked   absent; PC: γ, as their interspaces     vertical from
          δ, ε       posterior edge of
                  eye
Babka head without below level predorsal present AOC: σ, λ, pores small e.g. pores α, 7 4+3/2 anteriorly ending
  barbels of lower area partially   κ, ω, α, β, ρ; β, ρ clearly smaller than     below eye
    eye edge scaled and D1   POC: ρ1, ρ2; their interspaces      
      base scaled   PC: γ, δ, ε        
Benthophilus barbels variable, predorsal area present head canals pores absent 7 (last can 4+3/2 barely reaching
  present above or and D1 base   absent   be as single   forward to the
  on ventral below level naked       papilla)   vertical from
  surface of of lower             posterior edge of
  head eye edge             eye
Chromogobius head without variable, predorsal present AOC: σ, λ, κ, pores small e.g. pores α, 7 (last as 5+2/1 anteriorly ending
  barbels above or area variably   ω, α, β, ρ; POC β, ρ clearly smaller than single papilla)   below eye or to
    below level scaled and D1   absent; PC: γ, their interspaces     the vertical from
    of lower base scaled   δ, ε       posterior edge of
    eye edge             eye
Corcyrogobius head without below level predorsal area present AOC: σ, one pores small e.g. pores α, 6 (last as 4+2/0 anteriorly ending
  barbels of lower naked and D1   λ/κ or separate, β, ρ clearly smaller than single papilla)   below eye
    eye edge base variably   ω, α, ρ; POC their interspaces      
      scaled   absent; PC        
          absent        
Coryogalops head without below level predorsal area present, AOC: σ, λ, pores small e.g. pores α, 5 to 7 variable anteriorly ending
  barbels of lower naked and D1 except κ, ω, α, β, ρ; β, ρ clearly smaller than     below eye or to
    eye edge base variably in C. POC: ρ1, ρ2; their interspaces     the vertical from
      scaled anomolus PC: γ, δ, ε       posterior edge of
                  eye

......continued on the next page

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF