Antrodiaetus coylei, Cokendolpher, James C., Peck, Robert W. & Niwa, Christine G., 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170130 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5657863 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F305878B-F750-FFE8-553E-FEF8FCCFFC05 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Antrodiaetus coylei |
status |
sp. nov. |
Antrodiaetus coylei View in CoL n. sp.
Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 7 View FIGURE 7 , 12 View FIGURES 12 – 15 , 24–25 View FIGURES 22 – 33 , 35 View FIGURES 34 – 37 , 40–41 View FIGURES 38 – 41 , 50 View FIGURES 49 – 52
Antrodiaetus View in CoL new sp. #1: Niwa & Peck 2002:791.
Type Material. Oregon (all collected on 11 Oct. 1998 by Niwa and Peck USFS): Jackson County, Ashland Watershed, Ashland Ranger District, Rogue River National Forest: N42°9’50.2”, W122°42’24.9” (926–1024 m elevation) (male holotype, NMNH; 18 male paratypes, WFIC); N42°8’58.0”, W122°41’14.3” (1219–1268 m elevation) (3 male paratypes, TTU); N42°8’58.0”, W122°42’24.9” (1000–1146 m elevation) (21 male paratypes, JCC); N42°8’5.7”, W122°42’24.9” (1463 m elevation) (2 male paratypes, TTU); N42°8’5.7”, W122°41’14.3” (1317–1365 m elevation) (6 male paratypes, AMNH).
Diagnosis. This species differs from many members of the genus by having the three opisthosomal sclerotized patches fused into a single scutum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ). Others with this characteristic occur in Japan, eastern North America, and the Pacific Northwest of the USA (Oregon: A. metapacificus n. sp. and Washington: A. cerberus Coyle ). Antrodiaetus coylei n. sp. can be easily distinguished from A. metapacificus n. sp. and A. cerberus by having a small cheliceral distodorsal projection ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 34 – 37 ).
Etymology. The specific epithet honors Dr. Fred Coyle for his many excellent studies in arachnology. His work has led the way for others to know Antrodiaetidae .
Distribution. Known only from the Ashland Ranger District, Rogue River National Forest, Jackson County, Oregon ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Description. Female unknown. Male (n = 51): body large, total body length 12.2 (10.6, 13.65), and orangishbrown, appendages and sclerotized patches on opisthosoma more evenly brown, dark brown pigment encircling anterior median eyes and between posterior median and lateral eyes. In freshly collected material the body and legs appear more greenishbrown in coloration.
Dorsal shield of the prosoma 6.3 (4.95, 6.4) [mean ± s.d., 5.88 ± 0.32 (n = 50)] long, 4.55 (3.7, 4.8) wide, with thin weak setae scattered sparsely over pars thoracica except slightly denser along lateral and posterior borders.
Opisthosoma 5.9 (5.65, 7.25) long, 3.55 (3.5, 5.5) wide; all three dorsal sclerotized patches fused into single scutum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12 – 15 ); male genital plate with sclerotized parts undivided, slightly to strongly recurved (24–25).
Chelicera with large area on upper ectal surface without setae; with distodorsal projection ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 34 – 37 ).
Palp with tibia swollen. Tibia 2.3–2.7 times longer than wide; widest in proximal third; 3.55 (3.0, 3.4) long, 1.3 (1.15, 1.45) wide. Tip of outer conductor sclerite ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49 – 52 ) roundly pointed; closely appressed to inner conductor sclerite. Tip of inner conductor sclerite well sclerotized and not curved.
Leg I ( Figs. 40–41 View FIGURES 38 – 41 ) without any segment being greatly enlarged or modified with processes; femur 5.2 (4.8, 5.55) long, patella 2.3 (2.1, 2.4) long, tibia 3.75 (3.35, 3.65) long, 1.35 (1.1, 1.2) wide, metatarsus 4.55 (4.1, 4.75) long, tarsus 2.35 (2.25, 2.6) long. Macrosetae with 21–42% being ensiform: with 48 (13 ensiform) [43 (9 ensiform), 38 (16 ensiform)] macrosetae. Tibia I with 11 (6 large) [5, 14 (6 large)] medial (not extending to distal end) macrosetae ventrolaterally, the longest seta at most about width of tibia (about as long as prolateral macrosetae). Tibia I without large heavy macrosetae ventrally; tibia and metatarsus I not swollen in lateral view; metatarsus I sinuous, without macrosetae ventrally; other setae ventrally on metatarsus I = 1.3 times greatest width of segment.
Variation. One of the males is yellowishbrown in color; much lighter in coloration than any of the other specimens. It does not otherwise differ remarkably from the rest of the specimens and was collected in the same general area (from N42°8’58.0”, W122°42’24.9”) as normally colored males. Therefore, it is considered teneral and not normal variation in coloration.
Wandering Activity. All 51 males were collected on 11 October 1998 ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).
Comment. Antrodiaetus coylei n. sp. was only collected in the eastern Siskiyou Mountains study area. It was collected in 16 of 18 sites but was not particularly abundant in any one site, ranging from 1–7 individuals per site.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Antrodiaetus coylei
Cokendolpher, James C., Peck, Robert W. & Niwa, Christine G. 2005 |
Antrodiaetus
Niwa 2002: 791 |