Chinommatia turpis, Ng, Peter K. L. & Castro, Peter, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4209.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:849BAB5C-464A-4B4A-A586-5742411EDC01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617157 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F16BFB33-FFE6-FFBD-FF6A-F9D2FCB7FCC6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chinommatia turpis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chinommatia turpis View in CoL n. sp.
( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E, F; 25F; 32E; 43I, J; 53E; 60D; 76A‒E)
Type material. Holotype male (3.1 × 4.3 mm) (MNHN-IU-2013-9044), Vanuatu, Espiritu Santo I., Big Bay , MUSORSTOM 8, stn DW1115, 15°10’S, 166°53'E, 147–150 m, 0 9.10.1994. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Carapace ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E, F) of holotype male subovate, convex, 1.4 wider than long; front bilobed, with shallow median cleft; anterolateral margins arcuate, row of conspicuous, elevated tubercles (17 on right side) along each margin; thick, short tomentum on dorsal, lateral surfaces of carapace. Eye peduncle ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 F) filling orbit, short, thick, mobile; cornea large, not reduced, pigmented. Epistome ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 F) with semicircular median lobe with deep median fissure, semicircular lateral margins. Third maxilliped ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 E) merus ovate, anteroexternal angle rounded; ischium rectangular, slightly longer than merus. Proportionally short ambulatory legs ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E), with conspicuous tomentum; P5 merus 0.5 cl. Chelipeds ( Figs. 15 View FIGURE 15 E; 43I, J) subequal in length, heteromorphic; fingers of minor chela ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 J) subcircular in cross-section, scissor-like, cutting margins with few short teeth; large teeth on cutting margin of major chela of males ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 I). Inner margin of cheliped carpus with short tooth. Ventral surface of cheliped merus with row of tubercles on inner margin. Inner margin of cheliped carpus with short tooth ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E). Fused thoracic sternites 1, 2 ( Fig. 53 View FIGURE 53 E) semicircular, broad, long. Male pleon ( Figs. 53 View FIGURE 53 E; 60D) with proportionally long telson. G1 ( Fig. 76 View FIGURE 76 A‒C) slender, distal segment slightly straight, tapered, with short spinules. G2 ( Fig. 76 View FIGURE 76 D, E) about 1/3 G1 length, straight, short distal segment. Female unknown.
Etymology. The epithet turpis is from the Latin for “filthy” and “dirty” alluding to the appearance of the species in life. The name is used as a noun in apposition.
Remarks. Despite the small size of the holotype, it is already fully mature with the gonopods fully developed. In size and general features, C. turpis n. sp. most closely resembles C. littoralis ( Tesch, 1918) by the form of the anterolateral margin; being lined with small granules in C. littoralis ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A) but covered with larger, uneven ones in C. turpis n. sp. ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 E, F). In addition, the ocular peduncle of C. turpis n. sp. ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 F) is proportionately shorter than C. littoralis ( Fig. 25 View FIGURE 25 E); and the merus of the third maxilliped is relatively wider and more quadrate in C. turpis n. sp. ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 E) compared to that in C. littoralis ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 C). Since C. littoralis is only known from a female specimen from Indonesia, comparisons of the male characters are not possible.
Chinommatia turpis n. sp. is unusual among Chinommatia species in that it is not only the most pilose member of the genus, it also has proportionately the shortest eye. In addition, the G1 structure of C. turpis n. sp. is relatively more slender, especially along its distal half, than congeners, and the G2 is relatively shorter. In the characters of the eye, G1, and G2, C. turpis n. sp. more closely resembles species of Statommatia n. gen. Chinommatia turpis n. sp. nevertheless possesses a key diagnostic character for Chinommatia : the eye is mobile. The eye is fused to the cephalothorax in Statommatia n. gen. species. The status of C. turpis n. sp. should be reappraised when more material (including females) becomes available.
Distribution. Known only from Vanuatu. Depth: 147– 150 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |