Magadha basimaculata, Long, Jian-Kun, Yang, Lin & Chen, Xiang-Sheng, 2014

Long, Jian-Kun, Yang, Lin & Chen, Xiang-Sheng, 2014, A review of the genus Magadha Distant, 1906 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Achilidae), Zootaxa 3872 (3), pp. 235-256 : 238-241

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3872.3.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88E75695-DD70-44A0-A89C-2D9EFF204378

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6133759

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F1222322-FF91-A761-DBA8-129DA2CD2B3F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Magadha basimaculata
status

sp. nov.

Magadha basimaculata View in CoL sp. nov.

( Figs 1–16 View FIGURES 1 – 7 View FIGURES 8 – 16 )

Measurements. Body length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewing): male 5.1–6.0 mm (n = 49), female 6.0–7.0 mm (n = 20); forewing length: male 4.3–5.1 mm (n = 49), female 5.0–6.0 mm (n = 20).

Coloration. Greyish white to brown. Head, pronotum, mesonotum, and tegula brown with numerous pale yellowish brown dots ( Figs 1–7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Eyes reddish brown, ocellus pale yellowish brown ( Figs 1–7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Forewing greyish white, with differently sized brown to dark brown markings, with one broad dark brown marking across base ( Figs 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 8 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ). Hindwing pale brown, veins dark brown. Legs light brown. Abdomen dark brown.

Head and thorax. Width of vertex at base to length in midline 2.0. Ratio length of frons in midline to maximum width 1.2, ratio maximum width to width at base 1.7. Ratio length of postclypeus in midline to length of frons 0.8. Ratio of apical to subapical segment of rostrum 1.5. Ratio length of pronotum in midline to length of vertex 0.7. Mesonotum in midline 6.4 times longer than pronotum, 2.6 times longer than pronotum and vertex combined. Forewing with ratio of length to maximum width 3.0. Hindwing with ratio of length to maximum width 1.8.

Male genitalia. Anal segment in dorsal view relatively short ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ), with ratio length to maximum width 0.5, apical margin distinctly concave; anal stylet large, epiproct broad with apical margin just reaching apex of anal segment. Pygofer in lateral view ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ) with dorsal margin distinctly longer than ventral margin, narrowest part at ventral third, anterior margin broadly concave, posterior margin slightly concave; in ventral view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ), medioventral process of pygofer entire, with apical margin roundly convex. Genital style with apex angularly convex, dorsal margin rising from 2 sharp bent processes and 1 blunt straight process; inner surfaces near base with 1 fingerlike process, directed basad ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ). Aedeagus with phallobase sheath-shaped, symmetrical ( Figs 15–16 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ); in dorsal view ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ) dorsal lobe shorter than the ventral, with apical margin cleft in the middle, bilateral margin with apical half rising, rolled-up dorsad; in ventral view ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ) ventral lobe with apical margin incised in middle, each side of midline with a row of teeth; in lateral view ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ) apical half of phallobase only divided into ventral and dorsal processes, lateral lobes obsolete; ventral lobe with margin serrated, and the apex of dorsal lobe truncate.

Type material. Holotype: ♂, CHINA, Guizhou: Congjiang, Yueliangshan, 12 July 2006, Q.-Z. Song. Paratypes, Guizhou: 16 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀, same data as holotype; 7 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀, Taipingshan, Liping, 19–23 July 2006, Q.-Z. Song; 3 ♂♂, Maolan National Natural Reserve, 4 Aug. 2006, F.-L. Xu; 2 ♂♂, 1♀, Maolan National Natural Reserve, 3–5 July 2010, X.-H. Hou and P. Zhang; 2 ♂♂, Maolan National Natural Reserve, light trap, 17 July 2011, J.-K. Long; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, Kuankuoshui National Natural Reserve, 14 Aug. 2010, J.-K. Long; 7 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, Kuankuoshui National Natural Reserve, 14–18 Aug. 2010, J.-Q. Ni, P. Zhang, R.-H. Dai and X.-H. Hou; 1 ♂, Fodingshan, Shiqian, 18 Aug. 2010, Q.-Z. Song; 1 ♀, Dayi, Wangmo, 21–23 Aug. 2013, S.-Y. Xu. Guangxi: 8 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, Dawangling, Baise, 17–19 July 2008, P. Zhang and Z.-H. Meng; 1 ♀, Bangliang, Jingxi, 1–6 Aug. 2010, S.- Y. Zhou. Hainan: 1 ♂, Datian National Natural Reserve, light trap, 10 July 2007, B. Zhang.

Etymology. The species name is derived from the Latin words “ basis ” and “ maculatus ”, which refers to the big transverse dark mark at the base of the forewing ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 16 ).

Distribution. China (Guangxi, Guizhou and Hainan).

Remarks. Magadha basimaculata is similar to M. formosana but differs from the latter in: forewing with one big transverse dark mark at base (no such marking in M. formosana ); phallobase in lateral view with posterior half divided into 2 lobes (3 lobes in M. formosana ), and in dorsal view with lateroapical margin rolled-up dorsad (not rolled-up in M. formosana ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Achilidae

Genus

Magadha

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF