Family
SOLECURTIDAE d’Orbigny, 1846
View in CoL
dilatatus
View in CoL
,
Solecurtus
View in CoL
– Deshayes, 1860c: 383-384, pl. 14, figs 5-6, ex Sismonda ms. — Type locality: Alsace. — Type age: Pliocene. A nomen nudum in Sismonda (1842: 16; 1847: 21, both as ex F.
A. Bonelli
View in CoL
ms). — Current status:
Solecurtus dilatatus Deshayes, 1860
( Raffi et al. 1985: 375, as
S. dilatatus “Bonelli
”).
lamarckii
View in CoL
,
Solecurtus
View in CoL
; see following entry.
parisiensis
View in CoL
,
Solen (Solecurtus)
– Deshayes, 1835-HistNatAnim2: 63; 1839-HistNatAnim3: 524; 1839-TraitElem-1(2): 123, 4, pl. 6, figs 14-15, as
Solecurtus lamarckii
, changed for unknown reasons. A new species based on
Solen strigilatus Linnaeus, 1758
, the Recent type species of
Solecurtus Blainville, 1824
View in CoL
, but as used byLamarck (1806) for Paris Basin fossil material, as well as his own earlier reference to this species (Deshayes, 1824-DescrCoqFoss: 28, pl. 2, figs 22- 23). — Type localities: near Paris; Valognes & Belgium. — Type age: Eocene (Lutetian). — Current status: synonym of
Solecurtus deshayesii Des Moulins, 1832
View in CoL
( Des Moulins 1832: 106, new species based on
Solen strigilatus Linnaeus, 1758
, of Deshayes (1824-DescrCoqFoss: 27), non Linnaeus, 1758) ( Glibert 1936: 155-157, pl. 5, fig. 10, as “
Solenocurtus
View in CoL
”, an unjustified emendation of
Solecurtus
View in CoL
).
quoyi
View in CoL
,
Solen
View in CoL
–Deshayes, 1835-HistNatAnim2: 63;1839-HistNatAnim3: 524. — Type locality: southern Pacific Ocean. — Type age: Recent. This new species was probably proposed because he thought that
Solen albus Quoy & Gaimard, 1835
[which he mistakenly listed as
Solen candidus
, a name that does not appear in Quoy & Gaimard], was
a junior
homonym, non
Solen albus (Martyn, 1787)
[
Tellina
View in CoL
] ( Huber 2010a: 704).However, with only 11 exceptions, Martyn’s names are unavailable (ICZN Opinions 456 & 479, 1957; Opinion 1662, 1992), and this is not one of the 11; there is no other preoccupying name for a
Solen
View in CoL
. According to Huber, there is a specimen in the MNHN that may be a syntype.—
Solecurtus quoyi Deshayes
View in CoL
, of G. B. Sowerby II, 1874: pl. 2, fig. 5, is a different species that Huber (2010a: 704, unavailable; 2010b: 7-8, available) named
Solecurtus quaeritus
View in CoL
. — Current status: both taxa are now considered synonyms of
Solecurtus rhombus (Spengler, 1794)
View in CoL
[
Solen
View in CoL
] ( Huber 2010a: 348). However, Poppe (2018: 193) stated that
S. rhombus
View in CoL
and
S. quoyi
View in CoL
“are two different valid species;” the Deshayes species was illustrated by Poppe (2011: 366, pl. 1178, figs 5-6).