Tachytes copiosus Arnold
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13156992 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF305675-DB2F-FFFC-147E-CFF2D996EC8C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tachytes copiosus Arnold |
status |
|
Tachytes copiosus Arnold View in CoL
Figures 7 View FIGURES –11.
Tachytes copiosus Arnold, 1945:111 View in CoL , ♀, ♂ (as copiosa, incorrect original termination). Syntypes: Madagascar: Behara (MNHN). – R. Bohart and Menke, 1976:264 (in checklist of world Sphecidae View in CoL ); Pulawski,
2003:798 (in checklist of Malagasy Sphecidae View in CoL ); Madl, 2014:986 (in catalog of Ampulicidae View in CoL ,
Crabronidae , and Sphecidae of Madagascar, with synonymy and locality records).
RECOGNITION.— The female of Tachytes copiosus lacks unique diagnostic features, therefore it can be recognized only by a long suite of characters that eliminate the other species. So, its galea is shorter than wide and the gaster is all black, with silvery, apical fasciae of setae on the terga. Unlike T. picticornis , the apical depressions of its sterna II-V are impunctate (rather than punctate). Unlike T. indifferens the postocellar punctures are of two distinct sizes (the dense minute punctures are interspersed with larger, sparser punctures) rather than being uniformly small, the flagellum is partly ferruginous (rather than all black), and the femora are largely black (whereas the mid- and hindfemora are ferruginous in T. indifferens ). It differs from T. rufomarginatus in having a well-defined patch of appressed setae anterolaterally on the scutum (rather than the patch ill defined, almost absent), and in having the setae on the hindfemoral venter sparser and less dense. Finally, unlike T. flavocinereus , the clypeal lamella is emarginate mesally, although only inconspicuously so in some specimens (rather than non-emarginate), the admedian scutal line is concealed by the
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tachytes copiosus Arnold
Pulawski, Wojciech J. 2019 |
Tachytes copiosus
ARNOLD, G. 1945: 111 |