Protoaricinae, Gunton & Kupriyanova & Alvestad & Avery & Blake & Biriukova & Böggemann & Borisova & Budaeva & Burghardt & Capa & Georgieva & Glasby & Hsueh & Hutchings & Jimi & Kongsrud & Langeneck & Meißner & Murray & Nikolic & Paxton & Ramos & Schulze & Sobczyk & Watson & Wiklund & Wilson & Zhadan & Zhang, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1020.57921 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CC23B8CE-8C8E-473C-BD8C-44E74252A33D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF1E28D5-00D7-94E1-C016-366E1BD0A212 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Protoaricinae |
status |
gen. spp. |
Protoaricinae gen. spp. Fig. 18F View Figure 18
Diagnosis.
Body long and thin, <95 chaetigers, <15 mm long and 0.5 mm wide; without clear division on thorax and abdomen; parapodia not shifting dorsally in posterior segments. Prostomium short, bluntly conical with round tip; two peristomial rings. Branchiae from chaetiger 15-30 as short lobes, becoming very long and prominent on posterior segments. Parapodia with widely arranged rami, chaetal tufts emerging from low tubercles. Anterior neuropodia without postchaetal lobes, short conical lobes appearing ~ chaetiger 7 or beyond, becoming long posteriorward, disappearing in posterior segments; some specimens without neuropodial lobes. No notopodial postchaetal lobes. Notopodia and neuropodia with crenulated capillaries and long thin acicular spines in all segments; spines absent in juveniles. Pygidium with two lobes. Colour in ethanol white.
Remarks.
Genus is uncertain, probably new. Two morphospecies: one with neuropodial postchaetal lobes and another without.
Records.
127 specimens. Suppl. material 1: op. 100 (AM).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |