Cybaeus echo Bennett, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5026.4.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:511C28F6-07E4-412C-B83E-91D2CAC5AA27 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE3CB72D-FF99-FFA6-BEA9-A10D3BF1E507 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Cybaeus echo Bennett |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Cybaeus echo Bennett View in CoL spec. nov.
Figs 20–22 View FIGURES 20–22 , 32 View FIGURE 32
Type material. U.S.A.: California: Holotype female. El Dorado County, below Echo Summit, 9.vii.1958, V.D. Roth ( AMNH).
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Diagnosis. The male of C. echo is unknown. The female is diagnosed by the form and configuration of the vulval components ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 20–22 ) and is only likely to be confused with the females of C. devius or C. wilsonia spec. nov. Distinguishing the females of these three species is discussed under C. devius .
Description. Ventral tibia I macrosetae 2-1p-2-1p-0. Femora lightly banded.
Female: (n=1). See note under description of C. devius . Atrium ( Figs 20–21 View FIGURES 20–22 ) very small, about 1/4 width of vulva. Spermathecal heads ( Figs 21–22 View FIGURES 20–22 ) exit vulval ducts ventrally basal to region enclosed by copulatory ducts, deflected dorso-laterally.
Measurements (n=1). CL 2.7, CW 2.00, SL 1.33, SW 1.27.
Distribution. ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 ). Known only from the type locality in El Dorado County in the northern Sierra Nevada.
| AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.