Eunotia pottieziana Van de Vijver, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.629.3.12 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13992036 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EE152E3C-5806-FFA0-FF49-FA956123FDEF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eunotia pottieziana Van de Vijver |
status |
sp. nov. |
Eunotia pottieziana Van de Vijver sp. nov. ( Figs 1–15 View FIGURES 1–15 LM, 16–23 SEM)
Frustules rectangular, connected to each other to form short chains of up to 10 cells ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1–15 , 16–17 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Girdle composed of at least 5 broad open, perforated bands ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Valves clearly dorsiventral with a slightly convex dorsal and an almost straight to weakly concave ventral margin ( Figs 4–15 View FIGURES 1–15 ). Longer valves with almost parallel dorsal and ventral margins ( Figs 4–7 View FIGURES 1–15 ). Dorsal margin with irregular series of elongated, very low ridges ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Apices clearly set off, distinctly protracted, elongated, subcapitate, obtusely rounded. Terminal nodules very conspicuous at the apices, visible as black spots. Valve dimensions (n=50): valve length 8–70 µm, width 5–7 µm. Mantle rather deep. Raphe branches curved on the mantle towards the mantle edge ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1–15 , 17–18 View FIGURES 16–23 ), almost at the apices with terminal raphe fissures curving about halfway onto the valve face ( Figs 20–21 View FIGURES 16–23 ). At both raphe ends, pores indistinct. Broad hyaline area bordering the raphe branches on the abvalvar side ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Three to six rows of small areolae located between raphe branches and mantle edge ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Striae uniseriate, 14–16 in 10 µm, on the valve face almost parallel, clearly sunken between weakly raised, irregularly wide virgae, composed of moderately large, rounded areolae with sunken individual hymenate coverings ( Figs 19, 21 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Areola density 35–40 in 10 µm. On the dorsal margin, short striae set between the normal striation pattern, composed of only 3–4 areolae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16–23 ). At the apices, striae much denser with smaller areolae ( Figs 17–18 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Internally, distinct terminal helictoglossae present ( Figs 22–23 View FIGURES 16–23 ). One rimoportula per valve, located almost on the dorsal margin ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 16–23 ). Small pseudosepta present on each apex ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 16–23 ).
Type:— BELGIUM. Tropical fresh water aquarium, coll. date 15.x.2023, leg. B. Van de Vijver (holotype slide BR-4816= Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–15 , isotype slide 432 in Collection University of Antwerp, Belgium) .
Registration:— http://phycobank.org/104192
Etymology:— The species is named after Mrs Margaux Pottiez, master student of the author in recognition of her contributions to our knowledge of epizoic diatoms on sea turtles.
Ecology and associated flora: —The new species was observed living on plants and macroalgae in a 250l warm (T= 26.4°C) tropical freshwater aquarium, planted with mostly Leptochilus pteropus ( Blume 1828) Fraser-Jenkins (2008: 62) (Java fern), Vallisneria spiralis L. (1753: 1015) (Eel grass), Echinodorus cf. paniculatus , Cryptocoryne sp. and Salvinia sp. (Floating fern). The leaves and wood structures in the aquarium are regularly colonized by Audouinella sp. (Black algae). pH of the aquarium water was 4.2 and conductivity was 1050 µS/cm. The fish population includes several South American species such as Moenkhausia pittieri Eigenmann 1920 , Corydoras delphax Nijssen & Isbrücker 1983 , Platydoras costatus L. 1758, and Ancistrus sp. The diatom community is almost entirely dominated by Eunotia pottieziana . Other species in the community include Gogorevia heterovalva , Nupela exotica , N. lesothensis ( Schoeman 1973: 221) Lange-Bertalot (in Rumrich et al. 2000: 213), and several small-celled Sellaphora species.
Observations of small living Eunotia colonies showed that these were loosely attached to the substrate without being connected to plants of ornaments in the aquarium ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24–25 ). Curiously, a lot of, usually solitary valves, seemed to be incorporated on the tests of Centropyxis sp. , a further unidentified rhizopod living abundantly in the sapropelium of the filter of the aquarium. As the Eunotia frustules were observed having their chloroplasts, it can be assumed that they were living on the tests ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 24–25 , arrows).
Taxonomic comments:—As Krasske (1923) did not illustrate his record of E. monodon in the aquarium he studied, it is impossible to verify whether the species he observed on the glass walls of the aquarium is conspecific with E. pottieziana or not. It is actually unclear what E. monodon really is. Lange-Bertalot et al. (2011) discussed the typification and possible identity of E. monodon , choosing a drawing as iconotype showing a length of 33 µm and a valve width of 6.6 µm. Unfortunately, as valves have not been observed in the lectotype material, it is impossible to know what the correct identity of the species is. Most likely Eunotia maior (W. Smith 1856: 14) Rabenhorst (1864: 72) is meant by Krasske, a large, robust species (length 40–200 µm, width 10–13 µm) that could not be confused with the new species ( Lange-Bertalot et al. 2011). There are, however, a few Eunotia species that show some resemblance to E. pottieziana , some of them described from Southeastern Brazil ( Costa et al. 2017). Eunotia gustavoi L.F.Costa in Costa et al. (2017: 25) has a similar valve outline, similar stria density and pattern, comparable valve length but usually wider valves (up to 12 µm versus max. 7 µm in E. pottieziana ). On the other hand, E. gustavoi has very short raphe branches, almost only half of the branch length in E. pottieziana , and a rimoportula that is located more towards the ventral side (and not dorsal as in E. pottieziana ). Eunotia intricans Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin (2009: 141) , described from Panama, also has a similar valve outline, but a much lower stria density (11–13 in 10 µm, a lower vale width (4–5 µm) and a rimoportula situated halfway between the dorsal and ventral margins (see Costa et al. 2017, plate 30, fig. 7). Eunotia novaisiae Lange-Bertalot & Ector (in Lange-Bertalot et al. 2011: 179) has narrower valves (3.7–5.9 µm), its rimoportula is more located near the ventral margin, and its terminal raphe fissures are shorter ( Lange-Bertalot et al. 2011, plate 53, fig. 2). Another tropical species that could be confused with E. pottieziana is Eunotia inspectabilis Metzeltin & Lange-Bertalot (1998: 63) , described from Guyana. Both species can be separated by the shape of the apices, short and broad in E. inspectabilis , more elongated and more slender in E. pottieziana . According to the original description ( Metzeltin & Lange-Bertalot 1998, p. 64), E. inspectabilis can be wider (up to 8.5 µm versus maximum 7.0 µm in E. pottieziana ) and has a lower stria density (13–14 in 10 µm, versus 14–16 in 10 µm in E. pottieziana ). Finally, the terminal raphe fissures in E. inspectabilis are shorter as indicated in the original description.
Eunotia gustavoi and E. macroglossa Furey et al. (2009: 276) both show comparable distinct terminal nodules at their apices, clearly visible in LM as black dots. The differences with E. gustavoi have already been highlighted but also E. macroglossa , described from the Great Smokey Mountains ( USA) can be distinguished by the position of its rimoportula (at the ventral margin, close to the helictoglossa, see Furey et al. 2009, fig. 25), a higher stria density (16–18 in 10 µm at the apices versus 14–16 in 10 µm in E. pottieziana ) and the solitary lifeform whereas E. pottieziana forms short chains ( Furey et al. 2009).
Eunotia pottieziana can also be confused with the Eunotia minor / pectinalis group. The type material of E. minor ( Kützing 1844: 39) Grunow (in Van Heurck 1881: pl. 33: figs 20, 21) is not well known and the generally accepted concept of E. minor is very broad encompassing a large number of populations worldwide with very broad ecological tolerances, making it unlikely that they represent all the same species. Lange-Bertalot et al. (2011, pp. 158–159) discuss the taxonomy of this species without, however unfortunately, providing a solution. All illustrated populations in Lange-Bertalot et al. (2011, plates 160–163) show differences in position of the rimoportula, areola pattern around the raphe branches, shorter terminal raphe fissures and less elongated valve apices, to exclude conspecificity. The type material of Eunotia pectinalis ( Kützing 1844: 39) Rabenhorst (1864: 73) was studied almost two decades ago by Tuji & Williams (2005) showing that the valves have a clear gibbous central part and very straight, weakly dorsiventral valves, different from the valve outline of E. pottieziana that lacks the central gibbosity.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |