Narcissus miniatus Donn.

Koopowitz, Harold, Howe, Marilynn & Christenhusz, Maarten J. M., 2017, Nomenclatural notes on some autumn flowering daffodils (Narcissus, Amaryllidaceae), Phytotaxa 297 (2), pp. 157-167 : 158

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.2.3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13693683

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC39A536-6242-5411-AACB-FB461B7CF84B

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Narcissus miniatus Donn.
status

 

Narcissus miniatus Donn. View in CoL -Morg., Koop. & Zonn. in Koopowitz et al. (2005: 22)

Type:— SPAIN. Cadiz Los Barrios, November 1999: H. Koopowitz 11006 (holotype, HNT!).

Notes:—There were two species masquerading under the name N. serotinus . One has a six-parted lemon-yellow very reduced corona with a single flower on the scape, while the other had either a three-parted or an entire, but somewhat triangular, sullen orange corona and one to many flowers on the stem. Neither plant has leaves at the time of flowering. Comparing genome size measurements it was possible to show that the plant with the orange corona was an allopolyploid natural hybrid of the yellow corona species and N. obsoletus , which was named N. miniatus ( Koopowitz et al. 2005) . Maire (1959) used the name ‘ Narcissus × obsoletus ’ for the occasional natural hybrid between N. elegans and N. serotinus . But we stress here that N. elegans and N. obsoletus pertain to the same biological species; hence, the name N. obsoletus holds nomenclatural priority and is not the name to be applied to the hybrid. The polyploid, fertile species of hybrid origin was named N. miniatus , and the epithet ‘ obsoletus ’ should not have been applied to the sterile hybrid as it was already used by Haworth for the “leafy autumnal” species. Unfortunately, in some modern treatments (e.g. Díaz Lifante & Andres Camacho 2007, Bergmeier et al. 2011), the name N. obsoletus has been applied erroneously to N. miniatus , as N. miniatus is not the “leafy” autumn daffodil of Parkinson and Haworth. Marques et al. (2010) used the name N. miniatus in the correct sense. In part, the confusion stems from the use by Parkinson of the descriptor ‘rush-like (juncifolius)’ for the leaves in N. obsoletus . Even thought ‘junciform’ is usually used for terete leaves, leaves of Juncus can be either terete or flattened, depending on the species. Both ‘ Narcissus juncifolius ‘ I ’ and ‘ II ’ of Tabernaemontanus (1590) illustrates plants with broader flattened leaves. Modern workers have confused these names for plants we now place in the Jonquilla complex (a name with the same etymology as Juncus ).

H

University of Helsinki

HNT

Huntington Botanical Gardens

I

"Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Liliopsida

Order

Asparagales

Family

Amaryllidaceae

Genus

Narcissus

Loc

Narcissus miniatus Donn.

Koopowitz, Harold, Howe, Marilynn & Christenhusz, Maarten J. M. 2017
2017
Loc

Narcissus miniatus

Koopowitz, H. & Donnison-Morgan, D. & Zonneveld, B. & Howe, M. 2005: 22
2005
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF