Cis gumiercostai Almeida & LopesAndrade, 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.158790 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:924D11F1-73C7-4840-A3C5-BA9817355D27 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6269388 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA682572-395E-FF95-2E6A-F9B144B1F912 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cis gumiercostai Almeida & LopesAndrade |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cis gumiercostai Almeida & LopesAndrade , sp. nov. ( Figs. 6–10 View FIGURES 6 – 9 View FIGURE 10 )
Holotype. Male, BRASIL: MG: Cardeal Mota (dist. Santana do Riacho), P. N. da Serra do Cipó, 21.vii. 2002, C. LopesAndrade. In addition to the locality label, the holotype has a red label with its identification.
Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished from the other described Brazilian species of Cis , but C. leoi , by the following combination of characteristics: (i) distinct seriate and dual elytral punctation; (ii) lack of conspicuous frontoclypeal tubercles in both genders. It can be easily distinguished from C. leoi and C. fiuzai sp. nov., and also from the other species of the comptus group, by the morphology of the male genitalia.
Description. Male. Body length (excluding head): 1.45–1.65 mm (mean = 1.55; S.D. = 0.09); elytral length: 0.95–1.1 mm (mean = 1.03; S.D. = 0.08); greatest elytral width: 0.60–0.70 mm (mean = 0.66; S.D. = 0.05); greatest pronotal width: 0.55–0.65 mm (mean = 0.60; S.D. = 0.05); greatest depth: 0.45–0.50 mm (mean = 0.48; S.D. = 0.03). Body 2.29– 2.42 × as long as elytral width (mean = 2.35; S.D. = 0.07), convex, opaque on dorsum, dark yellowish brown; antennae, palpi and legs yellowish brown.
Head convex, deeply and ovally concave in the middle of vertex, conspicuously punctate; punctures uniform in size, bearing short and robust yellowish bristles; intervals among punctures finely reticulate; clypeus with one small, inconspicuous tubercle on each side; antennae with 3rd segment as long as 4th; 5th to 7th subequal, each one with approximately half the length of the 4th; 8th to 10th forming a loose club, each club bearing four “sensillifers” formed by a group of short, sparse and not wellorganized sensillae.
Pronotum 0.77–0.92 × as long as broad (mean = 0.87; S.D. = 0.06), convex; anterior margin broadly rounded, each side curved inward; anterior angles slightly produced; lateral margins narrowly ridge, finely crenulate, barely visible for their entire lengths from above; dorsum irregularly and distinctly punctate; punctures uniform and similar in size to those on head, each bearing a short, robust, yellowish bristle; intervals among punctures finely reticulate. Scutellum subpentagonal ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 6 – 9 ). Elytra 1.50–1.58 × as long as broad (mean = 1.56; S.D. = 0.04), 1.90–2.20 × as long as pronotum (mean = 1.98; S.D. = 0.13); sides subparallel in basal twothirds, then gradually converging to apex; lateral margins not visible from above, except for basal corners; base and disc with dual and seriate punctation, the larger punctures being two to four times the size of the smaller ones; the smaller punctures inconspicuous, bearing bristles similar to those on pronotum.
Prosternal disc slightly convex; prosternal process parallel sided, slightly curved and smaller in length than the prosternum ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6 – 9 ). Outer apical angle of protibia produced forming a tooth ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 6 – 9 ). Metasternum with longitudinal suture (discrimen) in its middle, extending from base to disc. First ventrite bearing a setose patch ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 6 – 9 ).
Male genitalia ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Eighth sternite subtrapezoidal, with its posterior margin slightly curved inward. Tegmen with diverging lateral margins; basiconical sensillae distributed along the apical and until the middle of the lateral margins; apical margin strongly emarginate at middle, forming two lateral lobes; basal margin rounded. Median lobe 0.67× as long as tegmen, subparallel sided in its basal threefourths, then slightly constricted and expanded in a rounded apex, forming a somewhat globular apex.
Female. Body length (excluding head): 1.40–1.65 mm (mean = 1.56; S.D. = 0.10); elytral length: 1.0– 1.15 mm (mean = 1.08; S.D. = 0.06); greatest elytral width: 0.65– 0.65 mm (mean = 0.65; S.D. = 0.0); greatest pronotal width: 0.55–0.60 mm (mean = 0.58; S.D. = 0.03); greatest depth: 0.45–0.50 mm (mean = 0.48; S.D. = 0.03). First ventrite without a setose patch.
Other specimens examined. Paratypes (51): 24 males, 27 females, same data as holotype. Besides a locality label, all paratypes have a yellow label with their identifications.
Host fungus. Bracket mushroom ( Polyporaceae sensu lato), unidentified species, growing in a wood fence.
Etymology. This species is named in honor of Fabiano GumierCosta, who was wandering around the Cerrado vegetation of Serra do Cipó while C. LopesAndrade collected this species. Fabiano is an enthusiastic of insect taxonomy, etology and ecology. Recently, he has got his Master Degree in Entomology with a dissertation on the ecology of Ciidae from the Amazon Forest.
Distribution. Known from a single field collection in Cardeal Mota (dist. Santana do Riacho, Minas Gerais State, BRAZIL; 19º30’S, 43º44’W).
Depositories. Holotype (male), 1 male and 1 female paratype at “Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo”, São Paulo, SP, BRAZIL. Two specimens will be deposited in the following personal or institutional collections: Mr. Ayr de Moura Bello, BRAZIL; Mr. Rafal Ruta, POLAND; Mr. Roman Królik, POLAND; Dr. Paulo Sérgio Fiuza Ferreira, “Museu de Entomologia da Universidade Federal de Viçosa”, Viçosa, MG, BRAZIL; Dr. John F. Lawrence, Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO Entomology, Canberra, AUSTRALIA; Dr. Philip D. Perkins, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, USA; Dr. Chuck Bellamy, California State Collection of Arthropods, Sacramento, USA. Remaining paratypes (35) are in the personal collection of the junior author.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |