Leptusa (Roubaliusa) flagrifera, Assing, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5276613 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA1EF20A-FFF1-FFA7-CEAB-FF44FC09FE57 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Leptusa (Roubaliusa) flagrifera |
status |
sp. nov. |
Leptusa (Roubaliusa) flagrifera View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 39-40 View Figs 31-40 , 44-45 View Figs 41-48 , Map 4 View Map 4 )
T y p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype 3: " Iran, Gilan [IR08-29], Fuman County, Tales Mts., N- Slope, Masuleh-Khalkhal road, 4 km NW Masuleh, leaves debris, sifted, 1404 m, 37°10'34.8"N, 48°58'76.6"E [recte: 37°10.348'N, 48°58.766'E], 1458 m, 08.VI.2008, leg. A. Pütz / Holotypus 3 Leptusa flagrifera sp. n. det. V. Assing 2009" (cPüt). Paratypes: 2♀♀: same data as holotype (cPüt, cAss).
C o m m e n t: Since the holotype of L. flagrifera was found in the same locality as that of the highly similar L. piciformis , the females were identified only based on their coloration.
D e s c r i p t i o n: External characters highly similar to those of L. soriciformis , distinguished only by the male sexual characters:
3: posterior margin of sternite VII strongly and broadly concave in the middle, on either side of this concavity weakly produced and with conspicuous long setae ( Fig. 39 View Figs 31-40 ); posterior margin of sternite VIII convexly produced (not pointed or angled) in the middle and with dense marginal setae ( Fig. 40 View Figs 31-40 ); median lobe of aedeagus large, approximately 0.50 mm long, with conspicuously long and apically strongly curved flagellum and apical structures of characteristic shape.
♀: spermatheca as in Fig. 45. View Figs 41-48
E t y m o l o g y: The name (Latin; carrier of a whip) alludes to the conspicuously long flagellum in the internal sac of the aedeagus.
C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: Leptusa flagrifera is reliably distinguished from other Iranian representatives of Roubaliusa by the morphology of the aedeagus (much larger, flagellum much longer, shape of apical internal structures), as well as by the shapes of the male sternites VII and VIII. It is separated from L. sengleti , with which it shares the similar morphology of the male sternite VII, by the completely different morphology of the aedeagus.
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d b i o n o m i c s: Thetypematerialwascollectedinthe same locality ( Map 4 View Map 4 ) and under the same circumstances as that of L. piciformis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |