Leptusa (Roubaliusa) piciformis, Assing, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5276613 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EA1EF20A-FFEE-FFB9-CEAB-FEA4FD6BF997 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Leptusa (Roubaliusa) piciformis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Leptusa (Roubaliusa) piciformis View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 35-38 View Figs 31-40 , 43 View Figs 41-48 , Map 4 View Map 4 )
T y p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype 3: " Iran, Gilan [IR08-29], Fuman County, Tales Mts., N- Slope, Masuleh-Khalkhal road, 4 km NW Masuleh, leaves debris, sifted, 1404 m, 37°10'34.8"N, 48°58'76.6"E [recte: 37°10.348'N, 48°58.766'E], 1458 m, 08.VI.2008, leg. A. Pütz / Holotypus 3 Leptusa piciformis sp. n. det. V. Assing 2009" (cPüt). Paratype ♀: same data as holotype (cAss).
C o m m e n t: Since the type localities of L. piciformis and the highly similar L. flagrifera are identical, the above female was identified only based on its coloration.
D e s c r i p t i o n: External characters ( Figs 35-36 View Figs 31-40 ) highly similar to those of L. soriciformis , distinguished only as follows:
Head not darker than pronotum. Pronotum larger and broader, almost 1.3 times as wide as long.
3: posterior margin of sternite VII strongly concave in the middle, on either side of this concavity obtusely produced and with conspicuous long setae ( Fig. 37 View Figs 31-40 ); posterior margin of sternite VIII convexly produced (not pointed or angled) in the middle and with dense marginal setae ( Fig. 38 View Figs 31-40 ); median lobe of aedeagus ( Fig. 43 View Figs 41-48 ) approximately 0.44 mm long, with moderately long and moderately curved flagellum and apical structures of characteristic shape.
♀: spermatheca not distinctive.
E t y m o l o g y: The name (adjective) alludes to the shape of the apical internal structures of the aedeagus, which somewhat resemble the head of a woodpecker (Latin: picus).
C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: Leptusa piciformis is reliably distinguished from other Iranian representatives of Roubaliusa by the morphology of the aedeagus, particularly by the shape of the ventral process in lateral view, the shape and length of the flagellum, and the shape of the apical internal structures, as well as by the deeply concave posterior margin of the male sternite VII, and the posteriorly convexly produced posterior margin of the male sternite VIII. The shape of the flagellum and of the ventral process (lateral view) are somewhat similar to those of the externally similar L. sengleti . From this species, L. piciformis is separated only by the different shape of the apical internal structures of the aedeagus ( L. sengleti : apex shorter, shaped like the head of a dolphin, similar to that of L. delphiniformis ), by the slightly shorter flagellum and by the slightly different shape of the contours of the median lobe in lateral view (angle between ventral process and basal portion of median lobe more acute and more deeply excavate, ventral process longer in relation to basal portion of median lobe). For illustrations of the aedeagus of L. sengleti see Figs 53-54 View Figs 49-54 and PACE (1984, 1989).
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d b i o n o m i c s: The type locality is situated in the Tales mountain range in Gilan province, northwestern Iran ( Map 4 View Map 4 ). The type specimens were collected by sifting moist and deep leaf litter near a stream at the margin of a beech forest at an altitude of approximately 1400 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |