Nomia (Gnathonomia) thoracica Smith, 1875
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.1.5 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B5409282-6539-4486-8C7A-CF38FE15C955 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3795454 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E61F577E-8804-C241-95EE-F94FC91EFE88 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nomia (Gnathonomia) thoracica Smith, 1875 |
status |
|
Nomia (Gnathonomia) thoracica Smith, 1875 View in CoL
( Figs 7–9 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 )
Nomia thoracica Smith, 1875a: 45 View in CoL , ♀, ♂. Lectotype: ♂, Calcutta; NHMUK, designated by Baker (1993: 259).
Nomia albofasciata Smith, 1875b: 57 View in CoL , ♀. Holotype: ♀, Java; NHMUK, designated by Baker (1993: 259); Synonymy by Baker (1993: 259).
Paranomia stantoni Ashmead, 1904: 4 , ♂. Holotype: ♂, Philippines: Manila. USNM, Synonymy by Pauly (2009: 155).
Nomia thoracica excellens Cockerell, 1931c: 40 , ♂ (nec. Cockerell, 1929; nec. Friese, 1930). Holotype: ♂, China: Foochow (Fuzhou); USNM. Synonymy by Pauly (2009: 155).
Nomia thoracica melior Cockerell, 1931b: 281 , replacement name of Nomia excellens .
Diagnosis. This species is unusually distinctive because both sexes can be identified by mesoscutum and scutellum fully covered with dense and short felt-like hairs ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ). Male. Mandible with projection ventroapically ( Fig. 7b View FIGURE 7 ); hind femur well developed, swollen ( Fig. 7e View FIGURE 7 ); hind tibia curved toward inside, exteriorly swollen gradually to apex ( Fig. 7f View FIGURE 7 ); apical margin of T2–5 with white or yellowish bands ( Fig. 7e View FIGURE 7 ). Female. Similar to male. Clypeus and legs normal; basitibial plate delimited by carina at anterior and both sides ( Fig. 9e View FIGURE 9 ); apical margin of T1–5 covered in white or yellowish bands ( Fig. 9f View FIGURE 9 ).
Redescription. Male. BL= 10–12 mm ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ), body blackish-brown. Head. HL: HW=0.83, head broader than long ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); GW: EW=0.85, eye much broader than gena; interocellar distance equal to ocellocular distance ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); frons and vertex with dense punctures; frons with smooth frontal line medially ( Fig. 5a View FIGURE 5 ); mandible well developed, blackish-brown or reddish-brown, with one tooth on upper margin medially ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); clypeus bumpy and enlarged at rim ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); ventral surface of mandible with projection apically ( Fig. 7b View FIGURE 7 ); vertex with rounded posterior margin ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ); antenna reaching apical margin of tegula ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ); scape nearly equal F1–3 together in length ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); F1 slightly enlarged, nearly as long as broad ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); F1 about 0.5 times as long as F2 ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); F2–10 almost equal in length, nearly twice as long as broad; F11 rounded apically, nearly 2.1–2.2 times as long as broad; ocelli normal, not enlarged. Mesosoma. Upper lateral surface of propodeum with fine punctures; metapostnotum with narrow longitudinal wrinkles; inclined part of metapostnotum narrowly triangular and shiny ( Fig. 7d View FIGURE 7 ); fore wing with three submarginal cells, 1 st submarginal almost equal to 3 rd submarginal cell in length, about twice as long as 2 nd submarginal cell ( Fig. 7d View FIGURE 7 ); tegula normal, not enlarged ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ); legs brown ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ); hind femur well developed ( Fig. 7f View FIGURE 7 ); hind tibia curved toward inside, exteriorly swollen gradually to apex ( Fig. 7f View FIGURE 7 ). Metasoma. Metasomal terga dull, with dense minute punctures; apical margin of T2–5 with white or yellowish bands ( Fig. 7c, 7e View FIGURE 7 ); S5 round apically, apical margin with two hair brushes medially ( Fig. 8a View FIGURE 8 ); S6 deeply thickened apically ( Fig. 8b View FIGURE 8 ); S7 as showing in Fig. 8e; S8 View FIGURE 8 as showing in Fig. 8f View FIGURE 8 ; upper margin of gonostylus rounded, as showing in Fig. 8a View FIGURE 8 (in ventral view) and Fig. 8b View FIGURE 8 (in lateral view). Pubescence. Clypeus, supraclypeal area and frons with dense short yellowish hairs ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7 ); mesoscutum and scutellum completely covered with short yellowish-brown felt-like hairs and mixed with some black setae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 c–d); metanotum with fine dense yellowish hairs ( Fig. 7d View FIGURE 7 ); upper lateral surface of propodeum with long yellowish hairs ( Fig. 7d View FIGURE 7 ); legs with sparse short hairs ( Fig. 7c View FIGURE 7 ); metasomal terga with sparse yellowish hairs ( Fig. 7c, 7 View FIGURE 7 e–f); S3–4 with sparse long yellowish hairs.
Female. BL= 10–12 mm. Similar to male, except the following: clypeus and mandible normal, not modified ( Fig. 9a View FIGURE 9 ); basal area of fore basitarsus with groove ( Fig. 9d View FIGURE 9 ); upper lateral surface of propodeum with sparse punctures ( Fig. 9c View FIGURE 9 ); metapostnotum with narrow longitudinal wrinkles ( Fig. 9c View FIGURE 9 ); vertical area of metapostnotum narrowly triangular and dull ( Fig. 9c View FIGURE 9 ); apical margin of T1–5 with white or yellowish bands, but colored bands on T3–5 sometimes disappeared ( Fig. 9f View FIGURE 9 ); apical margin of S3–5 with hair bands.
Material examined. China: Beijing: 44 ♀, 15 ♂, Wofosi (40°00′19″N, 116°12′17″E), 124m, 10~ 12.VI.1961, leg. Su-Mei Ge; 6 ♀ 4 ♂, Badachu (39°56′33″N, 116°11′20″E), 72m, 24.VII.1961, 21.VI.1961, leg. Su-Mei Ge; 7 ♂, Laohudongkou (40°02′04″N, 116°17′04″E), 51m, 20.VI.1964, leg. Su-Mei Ge; Fujian: 1 ♀, Shaowu (27°20′03″N, 116°57′25″E), 373m, 31.VII.1979, leg. Shi-Mei Song; 1 ♀, Fu’an (26°51′52″N, 119°14′32″E), 192m, 29.VIII.1963; Guangxi: 1 ♂, Guilin (25°16′07″N, 110°10′49″E), 179m, 11.VII.1963; leg. Chun-Guang Wang; Hainan: 6 ♀, 31.VII.1934, leg. Qi He; 1 ♀, Tongshi (18°43′21″N, 109°18′06″E), 625m, 3.VIII.1960, leg. Shang-Fu Li; 3 ♀, Ying- gen (19°01′37″N, 109°49′21″E), 390m, 4.VII.1960, leg. Xue-Zhong Zhang; Hebei: 2 ♀, Dongling (40°01′42″N, 115°27′16″E), 2097m, 8.VII.1963, leg. Tai-Lu Chen; Hubei: 1 ♀, Xuanen (29°38′15″N, 109°05′32″E), 1019m, 5.VIII.1989, leg. Long-long Yang; Hunan: 1 ♀, Guzhang (28°27′14″N, 109°48′59″E), 507m, 31.VII.1988, leg. Long-Long Yang; Jiangsu: 2 ♀, Chinkiang (Zhenjiang) (29°26′07″N, 116°41′43″E), 372m, 11. VIII.1918, 5.IX.1918; Liaoning: 1 ♀, 22.VI.1989, leg. Cheng-De Yuan; Qinghai: Guinan (35°53′31″N, 100°01′01″E), 3091m, 1 ♀, 6.VI.1957, leg. Yi-Ran Zhang; Sichuan: 1 ♀, Pengshui (29°11′10″N, 107°35′31″E), 735m, 9.VII.1989, leg. Da-Wei Huang; Shandong: 37 ♀ 39 ♂, Tsinanfou Long tong (Jinan, Fulong) (36°38′13″N, 116°48′14″E), 31m; Shanghai: 2 ♂, (31°06′09″N, 121°07′14″E), 4m, 16. VIII.1947, leg. Chun-Guang Wang; Shaanxi: 1 ♀, Qin- yuan, Guodao (36°40′30″N, 112°18′30″E), 970m, 2.VIII.1991, leg. Jian Yao; Xizang: 1 ♀, Motuo (28°05′19″N, 93°03′18″E), 1942m, 30.V.1982, leg. Yin-Heng Han; Yunnan: 7 ♀, Xishuangbanna (22°08′00″N, 100°34′42″E), 700m, 22.VIII.1958, leg. Yi-Ran Zhang; Zhejiang, 8 ♀ 8 ♂, Chusan (Zhoushan) (30°17′00″N, 121°41′39″E), 7m, 17~ 18.VII.1939, leg. O. Piel.
Distribution. Cambodia (Siem Reap, new record of bee found by S. De Greef and identified by JSA); China (Beijing, Guangxi, Hainan, Hebei, Hong Kong, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Liaoning, Macao, Qinghai, Sichuan, Shandong, Shanghai, Shaanxi, Taiwan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang); India (Karnataka, Kerala, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal); Indonesia (Bali, Java, Sumatra, Sulawesi) Laos (Vientiane); Malaysia (Johor, Kedah on Langkawi Island, Kuala Lumpur, Negeri Sembilan, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Selangor); Philippines (Luzon, Mindanao, Negros, Palawan); Myanmar; Singapore; Thailand (Chiang Mai, Khon Kaen, Kanchanaburi, Loei, Nan, Nakhon Pathom, Phetchabun, Phayao, Ranong, Saraburi, Surat Thani on Koh Samui Island, Trang, Yala; several new province records provided by N. Warrit, pers. comm.) (most recorded including new ones previously reported online by Ascher & Pickering 2019).
Floral associations. Zizyphus spinosus (Rhamnaceae) , Vitex negundo, Heterophylla (Anisophylleaceae) , Hibiscus syriacus (Malvaceae) , Homonoia riparia (Euphorbiaceae) , Leonurus artemisia (Labiatae) ; Buddleja sp. ( Loganiaceae ). Source: Huang (2008) for China.
Remarks. We follow Pauly (2009) in treating N. thoracica , the most widely distributed and commonly collected subgenus Gnathonomia , as a single variable species. Many specimens from China are considerably larger than those from tropical sites, such as Singapore, and there is also significant allometric variation in the protuberance of the male clypeus. Further study, preferably including molecular diagnostics, is needed to assess the status of geographic forms of this species or species complex form, including populations from China and from Philippines with available names N. melior and N. stantoni respectively.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Apoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Nomiinae |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Gnathonomia |
Nomia (Gnathonomia) thoracica Smith, 1875
Zhang, Dan, Niu, Ze-Qing, Orr, Michael C., Ascher, John S. & Zhu, Chao-Dong 2020 |
Nomia thoracica excellens
Pauly, A. 2009: 155 |
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1931: 40 |
Nomia thoracica melior
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1931: 281 |
Paranomia stantoni
Pauly, A. 2009: 155 |
Ashmead, W. H. 1904: 4 |
Nomia thoracica
Smith, F. 1875: 45 |
Nomia albofasciata
Smith, F. 1875: 57 |