Cetopsis Spix & Agassiz
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1679-62252005000200001 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DEDABC86-3340-4797-9561-5D1E0D07A76D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E56BC71F-0E20-FFB7-3E66-FD76FE27E780 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Cetopsis Spix & Agassiz |
status |
|
Genus Cetopsis Spix & Agassiz View in CoL View at ENA
Cetopsis Spix & Agassiz, 1829: 8 View in CoL , 11 [type-species: Silurus coecutiens Lichtenstein, 1819 , by subsequent designation by Bleeker, 1862b].
Hemicetopsis Bleeker, 1862a: 403 [type-species: Cetopsis candiru Spix & Agassiz, 1829 View in CoL , by original designation].
Pseudocetopsis Bleeker, 1862a: 403 [type species: Cetopsis gobioides Kner, 1857 View in CoL , by original designation].
Bathycetopsis Lundberg & Rapp Py-Daniel, 1994: 382 [type species: Bathycetopsis oliveirai Lundberg & Rapp View in CoL Py- Daniel,1994, by original designation].
Diagnosis. The combination of the absence of a spinelet associated with the dorsal fin, the absence of spines on the dorsal and pectoral fins, and the possession of a single row of teeth on the vomer distinguishes Cetopsis from the other genera in the Cetopsinae .
Remarks. The concept of Cetopsis utilized in this paper is considerably more encompassing than was the concept of the genus that was utilized in recent publications under which Cetopsis included only a single species, C. coecutiens (see “Systematic Overview” above).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cetopsis Spix & Agassiz
Vari, Richard P., Ferraris Jr, Carl J. & de Pinna, Mário C. C. 2005 |
Hemicetopsis
Bleeker, P 1862: 403 |
Pseudocetopsis
Bleeker, P 1862: 403 |