Pirabasoporella atalaiaensis, Zágoršek, Kamil, Ramalho, Laís V., Berning, Björn & Távora, Vladimir De Araújo, 2014
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3838.1.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:458183F5-78CF-4E00-AEA3-8C4477CF829B |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5617686 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E46D87BE-FF93-FFDD-50A9-FB98FB92FBB8 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Pirabasoporella atalaiaensis |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Pirabasoporella atalaiaensis View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 3–4 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )
Etymology. Alluding to the type locality at Atalaia Beach (Salinopolis city, Pará State).
Material examined. Holotype: MG-UFPA 6200-I, a colony fragment from the type locality at Atalaia Beach (Salinopolis city, Pará State); type stratum, Pirabas Formation, Miocene. Paratype: 10 separate colony fragments labelled as MG-UFPA 6201-I to 6211-I. Additional material: More than 100 colony fragments, MG-UFPA 6212-I to 6300-I from sections Atalaia, B-17 Capanema and Aricuru.
Diagnosis. Pirabasoporella with relatively large zooids and few pores in the frontal shield. Oral spines absent. Adventitious avicularia of two types: a small suboral one associated with an umbo, and a larger one occasionally developing on the frontal shield during ontogeny. Ovicell terminal, hyperstomial with uncalcified ectooecium and a pitted endooecial surface, not closed by the operculum. Abfrontal rhizoidal foramen relatively small and proximally situated.
Description. Colony rigid, reticulate with bifurcating branches connected by kenozooidal struts at regular intervals, branches growing more or less parallel to each other ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A-C). The struts usually developing at every second autozooid, jointly budded laterally from the distolateral and proximolateral corners of two zooids ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 B), slightly curved or straight, thick but hollow with microstructures indicating the same origin as autozooidal skeleton, surface smooth or with faint ridges and a row of slit-like areolar pores near each branch contact ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D), struts delimiting elongate rounded-rectangular to lozenge-shaped fenestrules indented by slightly bulging peristomial rim of the interjacent zooids.
Autozooids rectangular but slightly curved, arranged in two alternating longitudinal series initially separated by thin raised ridges that gradually thicken during ontogeny ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 F), frontal shield mixed umbonuloid and lepralioid, the short umbonuloid part restricted to the distal shield ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 F, G), the interior surface smooth and often with concentric growth lines, the lepralioid frontal shield perforated by 15–25 pores, some pores not penetrating the shield entirely ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E, F). Primary orifice immersed, ill-defined, secondary aperture not well preserved, relatively large, suborbicular with a variably broad U-shaped pseudosinus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 E), surrounded by a short, wide peristome that becomes thickened during ontogeny, proximolaterally carrying two protuberances, the prominent one towards the neighbouring zooid produced by a suboral avicularium ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D, E).
Avicularia polymorphic, of two different types: a single, small, suboral avicularium on each autozooid ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 E), cystid slightly raised, situated proximolateral to aperture, rostrum subtriangular, directing laterally to proximolaterally, pivotal bar complete. Large adventitious frontal avicularia forming anywhere on the frontal shield in elder zooids ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D); rostrum elongate-triangular, directed proximolaterally.
Ovicells large, terminal, globular but flattened frontally, hyperstomial, recumbent on proximal part of distal zooid ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–D); ectooecium uncalcified, endooecium densely sculptured with numerous tiny pits or pores apart from a broad, smooth, prominent rim surrounding ovicell opening that arches above aperture ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D), not closed by the operculum of the maternal zooid in life ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 B).
Abfrontal side of colony smooth, zooidal borders marked by thin raised ridges ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G), each zooid with large, deep, round to elongate rhizoid pore, occasionally surrounded by a thick prominent rim during ontogeny, sealed at its base by a multiporous pore plate with the pores situated along the margin ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E). An additional pore of the same type present at distal edge of lateral walls of zooids that do not produce a kenozooidal strut.
Ancestrula not observed.
Remarks. Although more than 100 colony fragments of Pirabasoporella atalaiaensis n. sp. were found, all of them are very small, which complicates assessing the presence and extent of morphological change during ontogeny within a colony, and distinguishing it from interspecific differences. The fragments do vary to quite an extent with respect to strut thickness, presence/absence of large frontal avicularia, and size of the frontal shield pores, for example (compare Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 3D, 4A). Morphometric analyses show overlapping ranges of strut thickness in the various fragments, with thin struts appearing in colonies that can be regarded as ontogenetically young colonies ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A), and thick struts in older colonies ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 B). Large frontal avicularia were exclusively found in colonies that were composed of older or even ephebic (gerontic) zooids, some orifices of which were sealed off by frontal calcification ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 D, zooid at lower left). Thus, we consider intercolonial morphological variability to be the result of ontogenetic change, not of interspecific differences. Frontal thickening of zooids and an increase in strut diameter is likely to be explained by the necessity to reinforce an expanding colony.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.