Palaeophylia tricolor ( Fabricius, 1781 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.499 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A50C1B67-2795-45D2-86EE-0A60637A4D1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10410382 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E452AB6B-FFF1-FC57-0F35-4BF82A9EFDE5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Palaeophylia tricolor ( Fabricius, 1781 ) |
status |
|
Palaeophylia tricolor ( Fabricius, 1781)
Fig. 17 View Fig
Chrysomela tricolor Fabricius, 1781: 129 (original description).
Crioceris tetrapuncta Thunberg, 1787: 47 (original description). Syn. nov.
Crioceris dimidiata Thunberg, 1827: 9 (original description). Syn. nov.
Type localities
Chrysomela tricolor : not stated; Crioceris tetrapuncta : “Cap” [= from the publication title]. Crioceris dimidiata : “Cap” [= from the publication title].
Material examined
Holotype
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 spec. unsexed; “ Chr. Tricolor / Fabr. Sp. Ins. n. 77 [w, h] // AfriGa / specimen ID: [p] / 251 [h] / specimen data / documented [p] / 4.IX. [h] 20 [p] 0 8. [g, h]”; BMNH – Banks coll.
Additional material
SOUTH AFRICA • 1 spec. unsexed, syntype of Crioceris tetrapuncta ; “Uppsala Univ. Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml. nr. 9521 / Crioceris tetrapuncta / Mus. Thunb. TYP [r, p] // tetrapuncta / 15 / Mus. Thunb. [box label, w, h]”; UUZM • 1 spec. unsexed, syntype of Crioceris tetrapuncta ; “Uppsala Univ. Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml. nr. 9219 / Crioceris tetrapuncta / Cap. TYP [r, p] // tetrapuncta . / Cap. 3 [w, h]”; UUZM • 2 specs, lectotype (head and pronotum, designated here) and 1 paralectotype (elytra and thorax) of Crioceris dimidiata ; “Uppsala Univ. Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml. nr. 9220 / Crioceris dimidiata / Cap. TYP [r, p] // dimidiata . / Cap. 4 [box label, w, h] // LECTOTYPUS, / head and pronotum / Crioceris dimidiata / Thunberg, 1827 / J. Bezděk des., 2018 [r, p] // PARALECTOTYPUS, / elytra and thorax / Crioceris dimidiata / Thunberg, 1827 / J. Bezděk des., 2018 [r, p]”; UUZM.
Comments
Thunberg’s collection in UUZM contains two syntypes of Crioceris tetrapuncta ( Fig. 17G View Fig ). Both specimens were compared with the holotype of Palaeophylia tricolor and the taxa are conspecific. Consequently, Crioceris tetrapuncta is synonymized with Palaeophylia tricolor .
The only known type specimen of Crioceris dimidiata ( Fig. 17C View Fig ) is a composite of two different species, but this does not influence the use of the name (see article 17.1 of the Code). The head and pronotum belong to Palaeophylia tricolor ( Fabricius, 1781) , while the rest of body originates from a beetle unknown to me (but not Chrysomelidae ). As Thunberg’s description of Crioceris dimidiata perfectly fits the composite specimen, I have no doubt that the specimen was already composite when Thunberg wrote the description. The head and pronotum are designated as the lectotype of Crioceris dimidiata , in order to fix the name to a particular identity, and C. dimidiata is synonymized with Palaeophylia tricolor .
Currently, the genus Palaeophylia Jacoby, 1903 includes nine species ( Nie et al. 2017) and Palaeophylia tricolor ( Fabricius, 1781) is its type species. The genus was never revised and it seems to be evident that some of the species are not congeneric with Palaeophylia and will be transferred to another genus/other genera in the future.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Palaeophylia tricolor ( Fabricius, 1781 )
Bezděk, Jan 2019 |
Crioceris dimidiata
Thunberg C. P. 1827: 9 |
Crioceris tetrapuncta
Thunberg C. P. 1787: 47 |
Chrysomela tricolor
Fabricius J. C. 1781: 129 |