Pancheria ternata Brongn. & Gris

Hopkins, Fortune & Bradford, Jason C., 2009, Nomenclature and typification of names in the endemic genus Pancheria (Cunoniaceae) from New Caledonia, Adansonia (3) 31 (1), pp. 103-135 : 125-126

publication ID

1639-4798

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:295C9B6D-61EC-4000-A704-7823D342771A

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E41087E4-FFF1-FFA3-CFD6-FA13FF26DB48

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Pancheria ternata Brongn. & Gris
status

 

38. Pancheria ternata Brongn. & Gris View in CoL

Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 9: 76 (1862) .— Type (as given in protologue): “Hab. in montibus, […] prope Balade (Vieillard, no. 590). (Specim.fruct.)”.— Lectotype (here designated): Montagnes de Balade, 1855-1860, old fr., Vieillard 590 (P! P00143082 , with label for “ Herbier de l’Exposition coloniale”; isolecto-, P! P00602440 , with label for “ Herb. Mus . Paris ”; possible isolecto-, P! p.p. P00479448 , ex CN, quoad fragm. inf., fl. ♀).

REMARKS

The evidence that Brongniart & Gris’s name Pancheria ternata , published in 1862, is not based on Montrouzier’s name Callicoma ternata , published in 1860, is discussed above under the latter name. Both names appear to refer to the same species, for which Pancheria ternata Brongn. & Gris is the currently accepted name.

The lectotype and isolectotype of Pancheria ternata are in poor condition and not easy to interpret. A third sheet at P, P00479448, has two fragments; the lower one is Vieillard 590 (Balade, 1855-1860) with leaves similar to those of the lectotype but with female flowers, not fruits, and it is possibly an isolectotype. The upper fragment is [Pancher] 46461 with galled/teratological flowers (see discussion of Vieillard 590 under Taxonomic history of Pancheria ).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF