Pimoa shoja Zhang & Li, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11865/zs.2021201 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C3E4F9D2-9C7E-4653-9F13-5B3E3AE63C25 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5460033 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E27F734C-C51C-837B-B3FA-F86D8B7B8E10 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Pimoa shoja Zhang & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pimoa shoja Zhang & Li View in CoL , sp. nov. ( Figs 28A–C View Figure 28 , 29A–G View Figure 29 )
Diagnosis. The male of Pimoa shoja Zhang & Li , sp. nov. resembles P. mainling (see Zhang et al., 2020: 89, fig. 6) and P. samyai Zhang & Li, 2020 (see Zhang et al., 2020: 97, fig. 12) but can be distinguished from P. mainling by the distally pointed PEP (vs. slightly wider distally in P. mainling ), and from P.samyai by the U-shaped PCS (vs. L-shaped in P.samyai ), and by the broad CDP, with many cuspules (vs. CDP short and distally narrow, with few cuspules in P. samyai ). The female of P. shoja Zhang & Li , sp. nov. resembles P.crispa (see Hormiga, 1994: 63, figs 239–247) and P.samyai (see Zhang et al., 2020: 97, fig. 13) but can be distinguished from the nearly round DP of the epigynum (vs. DP narrow in P.crispa and nearly tongue shaped in P.samyai ), from P.crispa by the nearly round S (vs. kidney shaped in P.crispa ), and by the S separated by a short distance (vs. separated by ca. 1/2 width of a spermatheca in P. samyai ).
Description. Male (holotype, IZCAS-Ar42431, Figs 28A–C View Figure 28 , 29E View Figure 29 ). Total length 7.10. Carapace 2.69 long, 2.56 wide. Abdomen 4.41 long, 2.25 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.11, PME 0.11, PLE 0.12; AME – AME 0.08, AME – ALE 0.21, PME – PME 0.13, PME – PLE 0.24. Leg measurements: Leg I 42.93 (11.88 + 13.80 + 13.84 + 3.41); leg II 38.86 (10.36 + 12.50 + 12.64 + 3.36); leg III 25.53 (7.44 + 7.81 + 7.96 + 2.32); leg IV 32.64 (9.28 + 10.36 + 10.32 + 2.68). Promargin of chelicerae with 3 teeth, retromargin with 3 teeth. Habitus as in Fig. 29E View Figure 29 . Carapace brownish with greyish lateral margins; thoracic fovea and radial grooves distinct; sternum yellow. Abdomen black, with yellowish transverse chevrons and vertical bands not extending to the distal part. Legs yellowish, without annulations.
Palp ( Figs 28A–C View Figure 28 ): patella short, ca. 1/2 of tibial length, with a macroseta; tibia short, subequal to cymbial length, with several macrosetae and a dorsal process; P short, about 1/3 of cymbial length, hook shaped; PCS U˗shaped, ca. 1/3 of cymbial length; CDP broad, with more than 35 cuspules; MA slender; C distinct; PEP subequal to E length; E beginning at the 6:30 o’clock position; embolic tooth absent.
Female (paratype, IZCAS-Ar42432, Figs 29A–D, F–G View Figure 29 ). Total length 11.17. Carapace 3.61 long, 3.64 wide. Abdomen 7.56 long, 6.08 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.19, PME 0.19, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.18, AME– ALE 0.30, PME–PME 0.22, PME–PLE 0.28. Leg measurements: Leg I 42.16 (11.64 + 13.56 + 13.08 + 3.88); leg II 37.44 (10.60 + 11.96 + 11.40 + 3.48); leg III 24.93 (7.44 + 7.81 + 7.36 + 2.32); leg IV 31.79 (9.36 + 10.44 + 9.35 + 2.64). Cheliceral teeth as in male. Habitus as in Figs 29F–G View Figure 29 . Carapace yellowish with black lateral margins; thoracic fovea and radial grooves distinct; sternum yellow. Abdomen black with yellowish transverse bands. Legs brownish, without annulations. Epigyne ( Figs 29A–D View Figure 29 ): triangular; VP broad, width subequal to length; DP nearly round; COs distinct; S nearly round, separated by a short distance; FDs yellow, laterally oriented.
Material examined. Holotype ♂, India, Himachal Pradesh, Shoja , unnamed cave (31.5300°N, 77.3800°E; elev. ca. 2960 m), 1 October 1999, leg. Klaus Weisshart (IZCAS-Ar42431) GoogleMaps . Paratype. 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar42432), India, Himachal Pradesh, Shoja (31.5400°N, 77.3800°E; elev. ca. 3040 m), 1 October 1999, leg. Klaus Weisshart. GoogleMaps
Distribution. Known only from the type locality.
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.