CTENIPOCORINI, Sites, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab105 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C06A1F94-AF08-4A21-B1F3-A0865FB1A8DF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6994625 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25E878F-FF9E-FFC7-FC62-82BE03C4FA64 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
CTENIPOCORINI |
status |
trib. nov. |
TRIBE CTENIPOCORINI TRIB. NOV.
FIG. 4A View Figure 4
Z o o b a n k r e g i s t r a t i o n: u r n: l s i d: z o o b a n k. org:act: 12EF5622-B1D8-465E-8393-3311969AB761
Diagnosis: Males and females both have twosegmented fore tarsi with paired, movable pretarsal claws ( Fig. 4a View Figure 4 ), which is the plesiomorphic condition. The nymphs have two meso- and metatarsal segments, another plesiomorphic condition, which distinguishes this tribe from the other tribes in Laccocorinae , which each have only a single segment. Adults have stout spines on the meso- and metatibiae. The aedeagus and parameres are symmetrical, which along with the
PHYLOGENY OF NAUCORIDAE ( HEMIPTERA ) 1265
pygophores, are dramatically different between species from the Old and New Worlds, and possibly also within each hemisphere. The body shape tends to be slightly wider at the middle and the fore femora less robust than in most other saucer bugs.
Comments: The two analyses yielded different topologies in the relationship of Ctenipocoris with the remainder of the subfamily. The BI analysis recovered Ctenipocoris as sister to the remainder of Laccocorinae and is here recognized also as the new tribe Ctenipocorini . The hypothesis in ML is less likely from the standpoint of character evolution, because the alternative character state of a suite of characters descriptive of Laccocorinae would have to have convergently evolved multiple times in other clades to support this topology.
Although Ctenipocoris is essentially circumtropical in lentic habitats, it is uncommonly collected. This widespread, disjunct distribution with few species and uncommon occurrence suggests that Ctenipocoris might have previously been more diverse and was outcompeted by other taxa, such as Pelocoris in the New World and species of Naucorinae in the Old World. In a treatment of Telmatotrephes Stål, 1854 (Nepidae) , which similarly is distributed in both hemispheres and represented by relatively few species, Lansbury (1972) also considered the discontinuous distribution to be evidence of a relict group in decline. A key to identify the Neotropical species of Ctenipocoris was presented by Herrera (2013).
Included taxa: This tribe is represented by only the genus Ctenipocoris and eight described species. A few additional undescribed species are represented in the Enns Entomology Museum, University of Missouri, and other museum collections.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.