PHILONTHINA (Li, Zhou & Schillhammer, 2010)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00731.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10545864 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E0275714-D975-0E17-FC11-EA52FAA3A8BB |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
PHILONTHINA |
status |
|
THE SUBTRIBE PHILONTHINA View in CoL
The present phylogenetic analyses are the first contribution to the phylogeny of the whole subtribe Philonthina based on broad representatives and morphological characters. The phylogenetic result supported the polyphyly of the subtribe Philonthina ; because the genus Erichsonius was the sister group of the remaining Staphylinini (very distant from the rest of Philonthina ). Another recent phylogenetic analysis ( Solodovnikov & Newton, 2005) and the earlier morphological study ( Smetana & Davies, 2000) converged on the conclusion that the genus Erichsonius is a member of the basal groups of Staphylinini rather than a member of Philonthina . This can be easily understood when considering the unique characters of Erichsonius , including absence of transparent apical membrane of labrum, presence of well-developed infraorbital ridge and weakly sclerotized postcoxal process of pronotal hypomeron, mentum with two anterolateral setae on each side, ligula more or less bilobed, the position of the aedeagus in abdomen, and the biramous paramere in some species of this genus. This genus Erichsonius should be moved out from the subtribe Philonthina to eliminate the polyphyly of Philonthina and it is expected that the systematic status of Erichsonius will be elevated to subtribe or tribe level in the future.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.