Longitarsus bethae, Savini, Vilma & Escalona, Hermes E., 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.171207 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6269180 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E00AD277-FFDF-FFFA-FEF7-FCB3FBC241FE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Longitarsus bethae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Longitarsus bethae sp. n.
( Figs. 1–18 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURES 2 – 4 View FIGURE 5 – 8 )
Description. Color light brown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), head and pronotum darker, antennomeres IX–XI slightly darker. Wings present.
Male: Length: 1.55–1.7 mm. Wide: 0.78–0.8 mm. Head ( Figs. 2–4 View FIGURES 2 – 4 ) vertex smooth, shining, convex. Frons at antennal insertions 2.5 wider than transverse diameter of one eye; supraantennal callus (AC) small, slightly convex, subrectangular, surface shiny, without sculpture, dorsal border delimited by a fine slightly arcuate transversal sulcus (TS) and joined at center to mid frontal sulcus (MFS), MFS short ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2 – 4 ) or inconspicuous ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 4 ). Ocular sulcus (OS) evident, deep, joinning to orbital sulcus (ORS). ORS, supraorbital (SOS) and supraantennal sulcus (SPS) deep. Supra frontal vertical sulci (SFVS) well developed, slightly convergent in the vertex, forming an angle of almost 90° with ORS. Supraorbital puncture (SP) well developed. Frontoclypeal longitudinal ridge (FCLR) high, apical half more prominent in lateral view ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2 – 4 ), in frontal view thin ( Fig. 2–3 View FIGURES 2 – 4 ), convex, dorsal end surpassing dorsal border of antennal cavity, scarcely introducing between supra antennal calli, anterior end does not reach apical half of frontoclypeal area, anterior frontoclypeal area triangularly flat. Genae shining. Labrum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 5 – 8 ) broadly rounded, transversal, bordered with small teeth ventrally, with eight setiferous pores at middle; tormae longer than labrum. Mandibles, rounded externally, with five small teeth in, two dorsal, two ventral and one apical, basal dorsal blunt and poorly developed, apical tooth more developed and prominent than the rest, basal ventral tooth not very developed, scarcely visible, mola present ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 – 8 ). Labium ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 5 – 8 ); palpi robust; palpomere 3 apically acute. Maxillae ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 5 – 8 ); galea elongate, longer and thinner than lacinia, apex with fine and thorny setae; lancinia globose and bordered with dense fine and thorny setae; palpomere IV conical, acute at apex, with sensilla patch longer than width. Antennae ( Fig. 9) almost reaching elytral apex, length 1.8 mm; antenomere II robust, subequal in length to III; IV 1.4 times longer than III; IV, V, VI subequal; VII slightly longer than VI; VIII–XI gradually shorter and robust; XI diagonally truncate in apical half. Pronotum width/length ratio 1.3, maximum width in the middle, anterior border slightly rounded, anterior angles not projecting, continuous with lateral borders; lateral callosities well developed; lateral margins explanate, wider anteriorly; posterior border widely rounded; surface shining, punctures isolated on disc, more dense and deep toward posterior half, intervals wrinkled. Prosternum wrinkled, glossy; prosternal process narrow between coxae, widened at apex. Scutellum triangular. Elytron ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10 – 11 ) oval, convex; humeral callus prominent; maximum width at middle; apex rounded; sutural angle acute; punctures stronger and deeper than those of pronotum, irregularly distributed, interspaces shagreened; posterior border wide; epipleura visible in lateral view, narrowing to apex. Mesosternal process ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 11 ) rectangular, slightly convex. Metasternum ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 11 ) shining with microrugosities; posterior border bilobed at middle. Fore and middle legs thin; tarsi thin. Metatibia slightly curved in dorsal view, with a longitudinal series of 7–8 denticles, median ridge almost on apical third; metatarsomere I subcylindrical, 1.3 times longer than tarsomeres II–V and 2.1X longer than II. Claws simple. Metatibial spur almost as long as metatarsomere III. Abdomen with ventrite I subequal in length to I–III together; ventrite V projecting medially, projection weakly convex at apex, its base bordered by a thin carina ( Fig. 12). Aedeagus slightly robust; apex acute; lateral view with longitudinal canal from near apex to near basal opening ( Figs. 13–16 View FIGURE 13 – 16 ).
2 3 4
6 7 8 10 11 13 14 15 16 Female: Length: 1.7–1.9 mm. Wide: 0.8–0.9 mm. Metatibial apex less robust. Abdomen, ventrite V not projected at apex. Apical third of tergites V–VI sparsely covered with microtrichia, denser at sides. Vaginal palpus ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17 – 18. 17 ) darker in apical third, apex diagonally truncates. Spermatheca with receptacle longer than pump. Internal side more convex than external. Pump forming an almost acute angle with receptacle internal side; apex acute; base, near the receptacle, with little hump. Duct shorter than receptacle, without coil and making short loop away from receptacle ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 18. 17 ).
17 18 Etymology: Dedicated to Elizabeth (Beth) Grobbelaar, SANC.
Comments: L. bethae can be confused with several other Longitarsus species of similar aspect, but until a complete revision of the American species can be completed, the diagnostic features of L. bethae are the aedeagus and spermathecal shape, antennomeres X–XI slightly darker, MFS short or inconspicuous, frontoclypeal longitudinal ridge slightly blunt in frontal view and prominent apically in lateral view ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2 – 4 ), presence of wings and humeral calli, and the light brown coloration ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). From the literature (Jacoby 1891, 1892) it can be inferred that the following Mexican Longitarsus species have some distinctive features from L. bethae , such as: L. teapensis Jacoby, 1891 is black; L. ovipennis Jacoby, 1891 is apterous; the elytral sutures in L. mexicanus Csiki, 1939 are dark; L. haroldi Jacoby, 1891 has the antennal segments I and VI–IX black and is apparently apterous; L. varicornis Suffrían, 1868 has the antennal segments V–VIII dark or black; L. concinnus Baly, 1877 has the antennal segments VI–IX black and probably is not from Mexico; L. antennatus Jacoby, 1891 lacks dark antennal segments and L. amulensis Jacoby, 1891 has castaneous coloration.
Type material. Holotype (♂): Original Stock: MEXICO: Morelos State, Cuernavaca, 18º 7’ N 99º 15’ W, S. Neser, AcSN2440 Adults collected off leaves of Lantana camara ( VERBENACEAE ). Orange biotype, Larvae feed on roots. Lab. culture progeny. GAU: Pretoria, Rietondale Experimental Farm. 25.43º S 28.14º E, 20 March 2003, D. Simelane ( MIZA). Allotype (Ψ): Original Stock: MEXICO: Morelos State, Cuernavaca, 18º 7’ N 99º 15’ W, 18 October 2000, S. Neser, AcSN2440 Adults collected off leaves of Lantana camara ( VERBENACEAE ). Orange biotype, Larvae feed on roots. Lab. culture progeny. GAU: Pretoria, Rietondale Experimental Farm. 25.43º S 28.14º E, 20 March 2003, D. Simelane ( MIZA). Paratypes (59 ♂♂, 73 Ψ Ψ): Original Stock: MEXICO: Morelos State, Cuernavaca, 18º 7’ N 99º 15’ W, 18 October 2000, S. Neser, AcSN2440 Adults collected off leaves of Lantana camara ( VERBENACEAE ). Orange biotype, Larvae feed on roots. Lab. culture progeny. GAU: Pretoria, Rietondale Experimental Farm. 25.43º S 28.14º E, 20 March 2003, D. Simelane, (7 ♂♂, 18 ΨΨ, MIZA, UNAM, USNM). Original Stock: MEXICO: Morelos State, Cuernavaca, 18º 7’ N 99º 15’ W, 18 October 2000, S. Neser, AcSN2440 Adults collected off leaves of Lantana camara ( VERBENACEAE ). Orange biotype, Larvae feed on roots. Lab. culture progeny. GAU: Pretoria, Rietondale Experimental Farm. 25.43° S 28.14° E, 1 March 2001, F. Heystek, (3 ♂♂, 8 Ψ Ψ, MIZA). Original Stock: MEXICO: Cuernavaca, Morelos State, 15.X.2000, S. Neser & A. J. Urban. On Lantana camara in Jardin Botanica, Adults> 30. AcSn2440 [Used to start lab. Culture in Pretoria, South Africa], (49 ♂♂, 47 ΨΨ MIZA, SANC, UNAM, USNM).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |