Naja Laurenti, 1768

Wallach, Van, Wüster, Wolfgang & Broadley, Donald G., 2009, In praise of subgenera: taxonomic status of cobras of the genus Naja Laurenti (Serpentes: Elapidae), Zootaxa 2236, pp. 26-36 : 29-30

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.190422

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6214571

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7A577E-284A-6A12-FF4B-1C7EC192E9BE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Naja Laurenti, 1768
status

 

Subgenus Naja Laurenti, 1768 View in CoL View at ENA

Naia Merrem, 1820: 147 (unjustified emendation of Naja Laurenti, 1768 )

Aspis Wagler, 1830: 173 (not Laurenti) (type species Coluber naja Linnaeus, 1758 ) Tomyris Eichwald, 1831: 171 (type species Tomyris oxiana Eichwald, 1831 ) Naga Nicholson, 1874: 104 (unjustified emendation of Naja Laurenti, 1768 )

Palaeonaja Hoffstetter, 1939: 57 (type species † Palaeonaja romani Hoffstetter, 1939 )

Type species: Naja lutescens Laurenti, 1768 (= Coluber naja Linnaeus, 1758 ), by subsequent designation ( Leviton, 1968).

Gender: feminine.

Etymology: derived from the Sinhala Naya , cobra.

Distribution: southern and south-eastern Asia and the East Indies, from Transcaspia to the Philippines and the Lesser Sunda Islands.

Content: eleven species:

Naja (Naja) atra Cantor, 1842: 482 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) kaouthia Lesson, 1831: 122 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) mandalayensis Slowinski & Wüster, 2000: 260 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) naja ( Linnaeus, 1758: 221) View in CoL

Naja (Naja) oxiana ( Eichwald, 1831: 171) View in CoL

Naja (Naja) philippinensis Taylor, 1922: 265 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) sagittifera Wall, 1913: 247 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) samarensis Peters, 1861: 690 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) siamensis Laurenti, 1768: 91 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) sputatrix Boie, 1827: 557 View in CoL

Naja (Naja) sumatrana Müller, 1890: 277

Diagnosis: Extracranial (ventral) anterior Vidian canal position, 0–1 solid maxillary teeth in all species ( Wüster, 1990—only 6 out of 650 specimens examined in that study had 2 solid maxillary teeth), seven supralabials with penultimate (sixth) shield low, combination of single preocular and two (occasionally three) anterior temporals, rostral broader than deep; internasals shorter than prefrontals; fang structure variable, all species except N. naja and N. oxiana have some degree of adaptation to spitting ( Wüster & Thorpe, 1992b). We tentatively include the extinct † Naja (Naja) romani ( Hofstetter, 1939) in this subgenus based on the shared derived condition of the basisphenoid morphology and the vestibular window, despite the possession of two solid maxillary teeth ( Szyndlar & Rage, 1990).

Comments: this is a morphologically relatively conserved, but ecologically highly adaptable subgenus that appears to be the result of a single colonization event of Asia from an African origin ( Slowinski & Wüster, 2000; Wüster et al., 2007; Wüster, unpublished data).

The issue of the type species of Naja has a complex background. Laurenti’s (1768) Naja was based upon six species from Seba (1734 –1735), all of which Linnaeus (1758) included in his synonymy of Coluber naja (in addition to 1735: pl. 85, fig. 1 and 1735: pl. 94, fig. 1): N. brasiliensis (1735: pl. 89, fig. 4) = Naja naja , N. fasciata (1735: pl. 89, fig. 3) = Naja naja , N. lutescens (1734: pl. 44, fig. 1) = Naja naja , N. maculata (1735: pl. 90, fig. 2) = Naja naja , N. non Naja (1735: pl. 90, fig. 1) = Naja kaouthia , and N. siamensis (1735: pl. 89, figs. 1–2) = Naja siamensis . Naja naja (Linnaeus) has been considered the type species of Naja by tautonymy, monotypy, and subsequent designation of Stejneger (1936: 140), M. Smith (1943: 426), Oshima (1944: 204), and others. However, David & Vogel (1996: 146) suggested that those assumptions were incorrect and that the only valid type species designation was that of Williams & Wallach (1989: 97), who selected Naja lutescens . However, Leviton (1968: 547) designated Naja lutescens Laurenti (= Coluber naja Linnaeus ) as the type species of Naja Laurenti and several earlier nomenclatural acts precede this action. Cantor (1847: 1038) could be considered the first revisor as he synonymized Naja lutescens with Coluber naja Linnaeus. Deraniyagala (1945: 108–109) then restricted the name Naja lutescens to the race of cobras inhabiting India south of 20° N Latitude. The type locality of Seba’s (1735) pl. 44, fig. 1 was given as “ India Orientali.” Deraniyagala (1945) recognized Naja naja lutescens as a subspecies and designated the type locality as Madras, with N. fasciata and N. maculata as synonyms.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Reptilia

Order

Squamata

Family

Elapidae

Loc

Naja Laurenti, 1768

Wallach, Van, Wüster, Wolfgang & Broadley, Donald G. 2009
2009
Loc

Naja (Naja) mandalayensis Slowinski & Wüster, 2000 : 260

Slowinski 2000: 260
2000
Loc

Palaeonaja

Hoffstetter 1939: 57
1939
Loc

Naja (Naja) philippinensis

Taylor 1922: 265
1922
Loc

Naja (Naja) sagittifera

Wall 1913: 247
1913
Loc

Naja (Naja) samarensis

Peters 1861: 690
1861
Loc

Naja (Naja) atra

Cantor 1842: 482
1842
Loc

Naja (Naja) kaouthia

Lesson 1831: 122
1831
Loc

Naja (Naja) oxiana (

Eichwald 1831: 171
1831
Loc

Aspis

Nicholson 1874: 104
Eichwald 1831: 171
Wagler 1830: 173
1830
Loc

Naja (Naja) sputatrix

Boie 1827: 557
1827
Loc

Naia

Merrem 1820: 147
1820
Loc

Naja (Naja) siamensis

Laurenti 1768: 91
1768
Loc

Naja (Naja) naja (

Linnaeus 1758: 221
1758
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF