Pristiphora staudingeri (Ruthe, 1859)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9162 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3D68EDB-9CF8-44A3-BC43-E9C2D6626BD7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF17F5D2-19D1-F072-6344-FB01C40231E3 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pristiphora staudingeri (Ruthe, 1859) |
status |
|
Pristiphora staudingeri (Ruthe, 1859)
Nematus Staudingeri [sic!] Ruthe, 1859: 306-307. Lectotype ♀ (designated by Vikberg 1978) in NMW, examined. Type locality: Iceland.
Pristiphora circularis Kincaid, 1900: 350. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00778165) in USNM, not examined. Type locality: Popof Island, Alaska, USA.
Pristiphora hyperborea Malaise, 1921: 11. Lectotype ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000003650; designated by Vikberg 1978) in NHRS, examined. Type locality: Torne Träsk, Torne Lappmark, Sweden.
Pristiphora asperlatus Benson, 1935: 35-38. Holotype ♀ in BMNH, not examined. Type locality: Mount Braeriach, Inverness, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Similar species.
Based on the external morphology, the most similar species are P. astragali , P. confusa , P. luteipes , P. opaca , P. pusilla , P. sootryeni , and P. subopaca . The combination of usually strongly coriaceous sculpture on the mesepisternum (Fig. 20 View Figures 18–36 ), the habitat (arctic or subarctic), and the structure of the lancet (absence of small spiny pectines or dentes semicirculares and well developed ctenidia; Figs 73-76 View Figures 73–76 ) or penis valves (Figs 97-100 View Figures 97–104 , 102 View Figures 97–104 ) should usually enable distinction of the species from other similar species. Vikberg (1978) treated P. hyperborea Malaise tentatively as a separate species, but no characters distinguish it unambiguously from P. staudingeri . The small differences in lancets (Figs 73-76 View Figures 73–76 ), penis valves (Figs 97-100 View Figures 97–104 , 102 View Figures 97–104 ) and the sculpture of the mesepisternum most likely represent within species variation and therefore we treat P. hyperborea as a synonym of P. staudingeri as suggested by Lindqvist (1953). In addition, penis valves and lancets cannot be distinguished from P. luteipes and P. beaumonti (see under P. luteipes ) (Figs 60-61 View Figures 58–61 , 101 View Figures 97–104 , 103 View Figures 97–104 ), which can have a completely smooth mesepisternum (Fig. 19 View Figures 18–36 ) and can be extremely pale (Fig. 13 View Figures 3–17 ). Because of the black metafemur, females of P. staudingeri can easily be distinguished from P. luteipes (completely yellow metafemur; Fig. 23 View Figures 18–36 ), but two studied Swedish specimens ( Jämtland County at an altitude 900 m) had an apically slightly yellow (W10115) or even apically half yellow metafemur (W10105), weakening the distinction between these taxa.
Genetic data.
Based on COI barcode sequences, belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura , P. bifida , P. confusa , P. opaca , P. pusilla , and P. subopaca (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The nearest neighbour (BOLD:AAQ2302, P. armata and P. leucopus ) is 2.76% different. It is not clear if nuclear TPI sequences allow better identification of P. staudingeri compared to COI barcode sequences, mainly because the identity of the male specimen DEI-GISHym80049 (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ) is uncertain. According to TPI sequence, this male from Sweden is closer to P. luteipes (males of which are not known from northern Europe for certain) than to P. staudingeri (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ), but morphological characters and collecting locality ( Härjedalen at an altitude of 840 m) does not allow for certain identification. In addition, COI barcode of DEI-GISHym80049 is identical to one of the P. staudingeri specimens (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
Host plants.
Salix herbacea L. and S. phylicifolia L. ( Vikberg 1978).
Distribution and material examined.
Western Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Great Britain, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. The species should be removed from the fauna of Denmark. Publications (e.g. Taeger et al. 2006) mentioning this species from Denmark are based on misinterpretation of Nielsen and Henriksen (1915), who actually recorded P. albitibia under the name P. staudingeri , as evidenced by the mentioned hostplant, Vicia cracca .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pristiphora staudingeri (Ruthe, 1859)
Prous, Marko, Vikberg, Veli, Liston, Andrew & Kramp, Katja 2016 |
Pristiphora asperlatus
Benson 1935 |
Pristiphora hyperborea
Malaise 1921 |
Pristiphora circularis
Kincaid 1900 |